New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Not believing that MM was abducted is a perfectly valid opinion which anyone should be free to express - as the other posters agreed the statement about the events in the apartment is just a matter of fact. There is no libellous intent.

”Only the McCanns know what happened in the apartment that night” suggests that they know Madeleine neither woke and wandered nor was abducted.  What else could it possibly be taken to mean?

[faithlilly]

So he's not a versatile career criminal who films his crime of rape of an older woman and the Lord alone knows what else ~ has convictions for molesting children ~ is a drug dealer ~ with access to expensive vehicles ~ is a prolific and obviously very good at it burglar ~ whose phone activated antennae in Praia da Luz just before Madeleine disappeared.

But as Amaral confirms, managed to slip through the net because he wasn't in when the police called on him ... I don't think for a minute that his convictions are reliant on a string of friends of a friend.  I think he's a nefarious person with a criminal record which proves it ... which of course doesn't make him guilty of being Madeleine's abductor ... but it sure does make him a person of interest worthy of further investigation.

If nothing else is enjoyable about this the twisting and turning of sceptics whose main battle cry was "JUSTICE for MADELEINE" at the same time as they pilloried her parents is certainly giving me time for a wry smile:  the Germans are doing their level best to do just that (justice for Madeleine) and are not doing too well in the popularity stakes as a result:(

Didn’t I read that the video of the rape was destroyed by the friends who found it ? Wouldn’t all decent people have gone to the police with it ? All in all it’s beginning to sound like the letter allegedly sent to Hewlett’s son.

[John]

If Kizzy says 100% the McCanns are involved then that is libellous

Involved?

[Mr Gray]

Can a McCann sceptic explain to me why the McCanns (who you think are involved in Madeleine’s disappearance) seem reluctant to accept that the Germans have got strong evidence that their daughter died at the hands of CB?



Well I can step forward to answer that for myself VS seeing you ask so nicely'

I am 100% the mccs are involved so in my mind how can I think its him

I have been following this case on and off 13 years. If it wasn't for me not being convinced it was them I would have been gone long ago, I don't come on here for fun.

Been on here for seven years, I have very early on tried to think of them as innocent but it never lasted very long.

I have thought there is something more to it, people in higher places IMO do not want the mccs to ever be guilty of being involved.

Okay, he is a vile person who no one cares I suppose if he lives or dies.  But what will you think if he ends up dead with the concrete evidence being hearsay and he is then branded the abductor?

There you are...100% the McCanns are involved according to Kizzy

[Mr Gray]

Involved?

I have been following this case on and off 13 years. If it wasn't for me not being convinced it was them I would have been gone long ago, I don't come on here for fun.

Been on here for seven years, I have very early on tried to think of them as innocent but it never lasted very long.

I have thought there is something more to it, people in higher places IMO do not want the mccs to ever be guilty of being involved.

there has been a fair amount of libel dirsected towards the McCanns...it just seems to be ignored

[barrier]

If Kizzy says 100% the McCanns are involved then that is libellous

Amaral wasn't even sued for that.

[Mr Gray]

Amaral wasn't even sued for that.

Im not that bothered but when john makes excuses for kizzy its getting more than a bit silly

[pathfinder73]

There you are...100% the McCanns are involved according to Kizzy

You think the McCanns are 100% innocent without knowing it. Kettle Black 

[Vertigo Swirl]

You think the McCanns are 100% innocent without knowing it. Kettle Black 

Another person who hasn’t the faintest understanding of libel, or simply cannot follow a logical discussion.

[Mr Gray]

You think the McCanns are 100% innocent without knowing it. Kettle Black 

You confirm everything I think about sceptics

[pathfinder73]

Another person who hasn’t the faintest understanding of libel, or simply cannot follow a logical discussion.

Libel? What false statement have I said?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Libel? What false statement have I said?

Did I say you had made a false statement?  Serious question - is English your first language?  You don’t seem to be able to follow a simple discussion.   If you say “the McCanns are 100% involved”. that is libel.  If you say “the McCanns are 100% innocent “ that is not libel.  Therefore there is no “kettle black” in Davel’s comment about Kizzy.  I don’t expect you to follow this logic or understand my point.

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

”Only the McCanns know what happened in the apartment that night” suggests that they know Madeleine neither woke and wandered nor was abducted.  What else could it possibly be taken to mean?

That KM was with MM after creche and before going out (except when she [KM] was in the bath). GM was with them both after tennis and before going out.

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

There you are...100% the McCanns are involved according to Kizzy

Read her sentence again. Kizzy is expressing an opinion. A libellous statement would state something as fact.

It is perfectly reasonable to freely express your own opinion - provided of course the statement isn't intended to incite violence.

[Vertigo Swirl]

That KM was with MM after creche and before going out (except when she [KM] was in the bath). GM was with them both after tennis and before going out.

Stop making excuses, it’s embarrassing.