New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Mr Gray]

The difference between you and I imo isn't that I believe the statements are 100% accurate, it's that you choose to believe what the McCanns said and disbelieve anything which contradicts their story and I don't.

My opinons are based on the evidence...I think thats the most sensible approach.

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

I judge poeple on the opinions they hold...but only when I understand the evidence to support these opinions.

It tells me how good they are at assessing evidence. I don't think you understand how some of us have reached our conclusions,,,which makes your argument worthless. I think its an absolute fact that some errors in the statement s will be due to the way they were taken...thats supported by Colin sutton for one. You think the statements are 100% accurate.... think you are totally wrong which makes my opinion superior to yours..imo


that again is supported by the fact that the parents are not being seen as suspects in the investiagtion

With regards to your last sentence, Colin Sutton is correct to point out that is the reason why OG is flawed.

[Mr Gray]

With regards to your last sentence, Colin Sutton is correct to point out that is the reason why OG is flawed.

Grange isnt flawed...sutton doesnt know if the mccanns have been re interviewed. im not impressed by his view on DNA transference either

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

Grange isnt flawed...sutton doesnt know if the mccanns have been re interviewed. im not impressed by his view on DNA transference either

He believes it was flawed for ruling out certain scenarios from the off. You of all people shouldn’t be satisfied with the attitude that says “The PJ have already investigated this so we don’t need to”!!!

[Mr Gray]

He believes it was flawed for ruling out certain scenarios from the off. You of all people shouldn’t be satisfied with the attitude that says “The PJ have already investigated this so we don’t need to”!!!

as I understand Grange looked at everything...which would include statements...I think its inconceivable to think they did not reinterview the McCanns...and decided the McCanns were not involved. Da carmo himself said...no evidence against the Mccanns

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

as I understand Grange looked at everything...which would include statements...I think its inconceivable to think they did not reinterview the McCanns...and decided the McCanns were not involved. Da carmo himself said...no evidence against the Mccanns

I’ll post the report of Sutton’s comments later. I’m on a phone atm.

[barrier]

as I understand Grange looked at everything...which would include statements...I think its inconceivable to think they did not reinterview the McCanns...and decided the McCanns were not involved. Da carmo himself said...no evidence against the Mccanns

It took until 2017 for any new suspect to emerge it seem's, then only on the say so of a bestest mate, if they looked did it not register.

[G-Unit]

My opinons are based on the evidence...I think thats the most sensible approach.

Do you treat all the evidence equally?

[Mr Gray]

Do you treat all the evidence equally?

of course not...each piece of evidence needs to be evaluated

[Miss Taken Identity]

of course not...each piece of evidence needs to be evaluated

and the evidence of a stranger abduction is- the parents said so.

[Mr Gray]

and the evidence of a stranger abduction is- the parents said so.

Not at all..I would say the evidence points to it being the most probable

[Billy Whizz Fan Club]

Not at all..I would say the evidence points to it being the most probable

What evidence - the circumstantial evidence? It’s not enough to charge the monster let alone convict him.

[Mr Gray]

What evidence - the circumstantial evidence? It’s not enough to charge the monster let alone convict him.

I never mentioned charges...My post was re the possibility of abduction. ..We don't know whst evidence the Germans have as yet...yet some are writing him off already

[faithlilly]

I never mentioned charges...My post was re the possibility of abduction. ..We don't know whst evidence the Germans have as yet...yet some are writing him off already

It’s certainly not enough to charge him.

[Robittybob1]

My opinons are based on the evidence...I think thats the most sensible approach.

Is it possible to have an opinion then, in the face of so little evidence?