New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Brietta]

How are the mcs going to face fresh heartache ...it obviously like we thought from the beginning it wasn't him.


   14 Jul 2020, 21:30Updated: 14 Jul 2020, 21:03

MADELEINE McCann’s parents face fresh heartache as police in Germany prepare to end their investigation into her disappearance.

It comes amid fears prime suspect Christian B could be out of jail in days.

German police are convinced the paedophile snatched Madeleine then killed her and say they will decide whether to charge him “within months”.

But lead prosecutor Hans Christian Wolters said his team would not continue their inquiries indefinitely.

Lawyers for Christian B, 43, will be at the European Court of Justice on Thursday to appeal his seven-year jail term for raping a pensioner in Praia da Luz in 2005.

Madeleine, then three, was abducted from her family’s holiday apartment in the Portuguese resort in 2007 while parents Kate and Gerry ate a meal nearby.

Mr Wolters said: “Of course we have an interest in keeping our suspect in custody.

“This gives us access to interrogations in the event of an indictment.

“We have no endeavors to drag this out unnecessarily. We’ll draw a line at some point and see.”

Portuguese police have been searching old wells around nearby Budens for the body of Madeleine. But they have not told British or German cops what prompted the operation.

Christian B, who we reported once boasted of snatching Madeleine, is serving time in a German jail for drugs.

If his rape appeal is successful he will be freed.

A source said: “What we fear is liberal judges will release him and we will lose him . . . which would threaten the case enormously.”

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/12124392/madeleine-mccann-german-cops-drop-investigation/
....................

"... like we thought from the beginning ... "  I don't know who the "we" is to whom you refer but there is a majority who would prefer to see Brueckner fully investigated within the law to rule him in or out of what happened to Madeleine.
When we know whether or not he will remain in a German jail for the time being will be time enough for his supporters to crow or otherwise.  I must say I am intrigued by the unswerving support of the rights which by law must be afforded to Brueckner by some who have spent much of their lives for the past thirteen years vigorously denying the same presumptions to the victims of a horrendous crime.

[G-Unit]

Its all about legality, not their views. How will releasing him threaten any case, there's evidence or there's not, which seems the most likely, not so concrete after all.

I don't think judges who uphold the law are 'liberal'. Upholding the law is their job. The German police seem to think the end justifies the means, but that's a slippery slope to be on imo.

[barrier]

"... like we thought from the beginning ... "  I don't know who the "we" is to whom you refer but there is a majority who would prefer to see Brueckner fully investigated within the law to rule him in or out of what happened to Madeleine.
When we know whether or not he will remain in a German jail for the time being will be time enough for his supporters to crow or otherwise.  I must say I am intrigued by the unswerving support of the rights which by law must be afforded to Brueckner by some who have spent much of their lives for the past thirteen years vigorously denying the same presumptions to the victims of a horrendous crime.

Lets be clear about this he's a nonce,a rapist and by all accounts a right vagabond,how does that make him an alleged abductor who it appears in some quarters to be the prime suspect in the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.There is either evidence or there is not,  I'd venture it is becoming even more tenuous with the passage of time.

[kizzy]

"... like we thought from the beginning ... "  I don't know who the "we" is to whom you refer but there is a majority who would prefer to see Brueckner fully investigated within the law to rule him in or out of what happened to Madeleine.
When we know whether or not he will remain in a German jail for the time being will be time enough for his supporters to crow or otherwise.  I must say I am intrigued by the unswerving support of the rights which by law must be afforded to Brueckner by some who have spent much of their lives for the past thirteen years vigorously denying the same presumptions to the victims of a horrendous crime.

So in your opinion will anyone do as long as it isn't the mccs ...because that's how it seems to me.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Lets be clear about this he's a nonce,a rapist and by all accounts a right vagabond,how does that make him an alleged abductor who it appears in some quarters to be the prime suspect in the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.There is either evidence or there is not,  I'd venture it is becoming even more tenuous with the passage of time.

Is that how you saw it when the McCanns were suspects?  Did you think there was evidence or not in their case? 

[G-Unit]

"... like we thought from the beginning ... "  I don't know who the "we" is to whom you refer but there is a majority who would prefer to see Brueckner fully investigated within the law to rule him in or out of what happened to Madeleine.
When we know whether or not he will remain in a German jail for the time being will be time enough for his supporters to crow or otherwise.  I must say I am intrigued by the unswerving support of the rights which by law must be afforded to Brueckner by some who have spent much of their lives for the past thirteen years vigorously denying the same presumptions to the victims of a horrendous crime.

"Within the law" is the significant phrase. I've seen no members here suggesting that anyone should be denied their legal rights.

[Vertigo Swirl]

So in your opinion will anyone do as long as it isn't the mccs ...because that's how it seems to me.

In my opinion the only person who will "do" is the person or people who did it.  If there are strong grounds for suspecting CB and he is able to evade justice either on a technicality or because the evidence (strong as it may seem) is only circumstantial then that will be heartbreaking for the McCanns and for Madeleine.  You may think you know the complete set of evidence against this man but I don't think you do.  Why would the police have laid out every piece of evidence they have against him for the public (and CB and his defence team) to pore over, before charges had been laid?

[G-Unit]

Is that how you saw it when the McCanns were suspects?  Did you think there was evidence or not in their case?

According to the Portuguese Supreme Court there was insufficient evidence in September 2007 to charge the McCanns, just as there seems to be insufficient evidence just now to charge Brueckner.

[Mr Gray]

According to the Portuguese Supreme Court there was insufficient evidence in September 2007 to charge the McCanns, just as there seems to be insufficient evidence just now to charge Brueckner.

Such a suggestion is total nonsense and shows irrational thinking..imo

[Brietta]

Lets be clear about this he's a nonce,a rapist and by all accounts a right vagabond,how does that make him an alleged abductor who it appears in some quarters to be the prime suspect in the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.There is either evidence or there is not,  I'd venture it is becoming even more tenuous with the passage of time.

He is a person who is entitled to certain legal rights under the law.  Exactly as you are.  Exactly as I am.

Unfortunately there is a small but hyper active rump of vociferous agitators who have denied those lawful rights to the McCanns and all associated with them.

I can see the dichotomy ... they simply are unable to and I think they are producing some interesting observation on social media.  Unfortunately, not about Brueckner, not about Madeleine's case ... but about themselves ... and it is most unedifying to behold.

[Brietta]

"Within the law" is the significant phrase. I've seen no members here suggesting that anyone should be denied their legal rights.

[Brietta]

So in your opinion will anyone do as long as it isn't the mccs ...because that's how it seems to me.

Then your opinion is entirely wrong and not based reading any of my posts.

In my opinion Brueckner fits a profile which should have made him a prime suspect back in 2007.  Incompetence or corruption didn't allow that.


As an aside in the post above you are displaying the dichotomy of thought process to which I have referred.  The very sad thing about it is ... I don't think you know you are.

[G-Unit]

Very true. How to spot the seemingly innoffensive.

[kizzy]

Then your opinion is entirely wrong and not based reading any of my posts.

In my opinion Brueckner fits a profile which should have made him a prime suspect back in 2007.  Incompetence or corruption didn't allow that.


As an aside in the post above you are displaying the dichotomy of thought process to which I have referred.  The very sad thing about it is ... I don't think you know you are.

OFGS...they say the best form of defense attacks.

You seem very emotional where GA is concerned....like as in he is more responsible for Maddie than the mccs IMO.

An emotional mind is a narrow mind B

[Holly Goodhead]

Then your opinion is entirely wrong and not based reading any of my posts.

In my opinion Brueckner fits a profile which should have made him a prime suspect back in 2007.  Incompetence or corruption didn't allow that.


As an aside in the post above you are displaying the dichotomy of thought process to which I have referred.  The very sad thing about it is ... I don't think you know you are.

CB onlt fits a profile on the assumption the motive was sexual.  What evidence do you have to support this?

If the motive was sexual how did CB learn MM was home alone in the unsecured apartment?