New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Lace]

Yet when SY took up the mantle they never looked in that direction did they?

I don't know they said they would not give a running commentary.

[Brietta]

She sounds a bit cross to me, because she got taken for a fool.  Beware The Ides of whatever.  This one can do much damage.

That's what comes of trusting Amaral.

She most likely didn't know he was a liar and a perjurer at the time.

But I think still being an influential media personality - even more so than she was in 2007 - I think he made himself a very powerful enemy by taking advantage of her trust in him.

[faithlilly]

That's what comes of trusting Amaral.

She most likely didn't know he was a liar and a perjurer at the time.

But I think still being an influential media personality - even more so than she was in 2007 - I think he made himself a very powerful enemy by taking advantage of her trust in him.

If it wasn’t for Amaral we would never have heard of Sandra and you wouldn’t be singing her praises....so looking at things in the round she has a lot to thank Amaral for.

[Miss Taken Identity]

If it wasn’t for Amaral we would never have heard of Sandra and you wouldn’t be singing her praises....so looking at things in the round she has a lot to thank Amaral for.

This link was on another forum I don't know what to make of it.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8534831/Madeleine-McCann-suspect-Christian-Brueckners-girlfriend-finally-unmasked.html

She is another one refusing to answer questions- her right ofcourse.

NB:
I am amending this post as it was edited to make it look like I think CB is the only person  who is suspicious in this investigation. Also, I mentioned who is ultimately responsible for the whole sorry mess. Not Amaral to be sure.

You need to guess who because I am not allowed to type it. It upsets some supporters

[Carana]

If it wasn’t for Amaral we would never have heard of Sandra and you wouldn’t be singing her praises....so looking at things in the round she has a lot to thank Amaral for.

If we hadn't all heard that a young child called Madeleine was missing, I doubt many of us would have ever heard of rather a lot of people...

On two legs or four, come to think of it.

[Carana]

“Forget bench coaches. The bites of those who know nothing. Read it. Look. But open-minded.

I have never seen a suspect like Bruckner: with so much evidence to put him at the scene of the crime at the time of the crime with a past that allows us to guess, but not prove, what he may have done.

It is not the perfect suspect. He's a pedophile and he's been with us for 22 years.

In the same years that Rui Pedro, Joana and Madeleine disappeared.

Bruckner is not a pedophile because there are complaints.
He is a pedophile convicted and extradited to serve time in Germany.

Did he commit this crime? Will it be associated with others? We do not know. We don`t know yet. But it is our obligation to find out ”,
  ... continued the RTP journalist, (Sandra Felgueiras) who has followed Maddie's case since the beginning.

https://www.hiper.fm/sandra-felgueiras-critica-goncalo-amaral-no-caso-maddie-so-podemos-falar-o-que-podemos-provar/

I laud her for wanting to get to the truth (whatever it may turn out to be), but I just hope she doesn't inadvertently screw up what seems to be a highly complex investigation broadcasting details that need to be kept quiet for the moment.

I see she's also wondering about Joana. That white house with the blue window frames was 15 mins by car from where she disappeared without a trace on her way home.

And Rui Pedro who disappeared in 98. He was later identified on a child porn site, poor lad.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rui_Pedro_Teixeira_Mendon%C3%A7a

[Mr Gray]

I laud her for wanting to get to the truth (whatever it may turn out to be), but I just hope she doesn't inadvertently screw up what seems to be a highly complex investigation broadcasting details that need to be kept quiet for the moment.

I see she's also wondering about Joana. That white house with the blue window frames was 15 mins by car from where she disappeared without a trace on her way home.

And Rui Pedro who disappeared in 98. He was later identified on a child porn site, poor lad.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rui_Pedro_Teixeira_Mendon%C3%A7a

I think Sandra is probably the only chance for justice for Joanna....and Rui found on a child porn site.....is taht what happened to Maddie...how awful but it ties in with what HCW has said.

[Eleanor]

I laud her for wanting to get to the truth (whatever it may turn out to be), but I just hope she doesn't inadvertently screw up what seems to be a highly complex investigation broadcasting details that need to be kept quiet for the moment.

I see she's also wondering about Joana. That white house with the blue window frames was 15 mins by car from where she disappeared without a trace on her way home.

And Rui Pedro who disappeared in 98. He was later identified on a child porn site, poor lad.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rui_Pedro_Teixeira_Mendon%C3%A7a

She is not the only one wondering about Joanna.

[kizzy]

That's what comes of trusting Amaral.

She most likely didn't know he was a liar and a perjurer at the time.

But I think still being an influential media personality - even more so than she was in 2007 - I think he made himself a very powerful enemy by taking advantage of her trust in him.

I think he made himself a very powerful enemy by taking advantage of her trust in him.


So your saying she would betray the trust of the public to get even with GA.

Not a very professional attitude then has she if that was the case.

You seem to think that ok to imply that she could hold a personal vendetta against him.

Something a good journalist wouldn't do........... or take advantage of that power IMO

[Mr Gray]

I think he made himself a very powerful enemy by taking advantage of her trust in him.


So your saying she would betray the trust of the public to get even with GA.

Not a very professional attitude then has she if that was the case.

You seem to think that ok to imply that she could hold a personal vendetta against him.

Something a good journalist wouldn't do........... or take advantage of that power IMO

She doesnt say anywhere she would betray trust...its amaral who has done thatby lying to her. I will be interested in what she has to say. It's excellent that she sees the Cipriano case as a possible miscarriage of justice

[Mr Gray]

When asked whether Maddie was on the memory stick found at CBs property HCW would not give  adirect answer...yet he answered other questions.

Rui Pedro found on  a video being abused...police believe he was later killed.

It just ties in extremely well imo

[Brietta]

I laud her for wanting to get to the truth (whatever it may turn out to be), but I just hope she doesn't inadvertently screw up what seems to be a highly complex investigation broadcasting details that need to be kept quiet for the moment.

I see she's also wondering about Joana. That white house with the blue window frames was 15 mins by car from where she disappeared without a trace on her way home.

And Rui Pedro who disappeared in 98. He was later identified on a child porn site, poor lad.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rui_Pedro_Teixeira_Mendon%C3%A7a

She raises a few interesting questions which shouldn't need to be raised by an investigative journalist ... the police should have been doing that and they should have been doing that a long time ago.

It took the Germans ... with a little help from Amaral to break the story.  I think if there is any damage done to the investigation Amaral would be my culprit, not Felgueiras.

I think connections which would have been raised long since in any country other than Portugal are only now being aired in front of the Portuguese people.  Who seem to have been fed on a diet of Amaral/Cristovao and their cronies' interpretation of what jurisprudence is but who are now being shown a different side.

I think there must be actual shock in Portugal about issues which have for so long been ignored or denied.  That the implications of a person with a record like Brueckner's had lived and moved amongst them for so long was made evident to the parents of the children of Sao Bartolomeu de Messines and to the parents of Portugal.

Perhaps the right kind of public pressure aided and abetted by informed journalism will bring changes to what has obviously been a lax system.
I still can't get my head round the fact that Brueckner was tried for the horrific torture and rape not in Portugal where it happened, but in Germany.

[Brietta]

I think he made himself a very powerful enemy by taking advantage of her trust in him.


So your saying she would betray the trust of the public to get even with GA.

Not a very professional attitude then has she if that was the case.

You seem to think that ok to imply that she could hold a personal vendetta against him.

Something a good journalist wouldn't do........... or take advantage of that power IMO

No ... I am saying THE EXACT OPPOSITE.  Please read my posts with just a little less blinkered opinion to verify that.

[kizzy]

She doesnt say anywhere she would betray trust...its amaral who has done thatby lying to her. I will be interested in what she has to say. It's excellent that she sees the Cipriano case as a possible miscarriage of justice

Well what else would a powerful enemy imply......a powerful enamy is not going to do the victim any favours imo

[Mr Gray]

Well what else would a powerful enemy imply......a powerful enamy is not going to do the victim any favours imo

of course she won't do him any favours after she trusted him and he lied to her. He only has himself to blame.