New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[faithlilly]

I don't know  that the statement is 100% accurate... It may well be. Unlike others I don't simply accept what supports my argument.. I judge objectively

‘According to reports they've spoken to his girlfriend who knew exactly where she and CB were on May 2nd’

So as far as you know this posted by you earlier could well not be true?

[jassi]

I'm quite picky as to what I accept s being true)

I've noticed - basically anything you don't like .

[Vertigo Swirl]

There seems to be a common misconception amongst McCann sceptics that McCann supporters are all absolutely convinced of CB's guilt.  Untrue, some of us think he may be involved, but nothing has been revealed yet that makes it a dead cert. 

[Mr Gray]

‘According to reports they've spoken to his girlfriend who knew exactly where she and CB were on May 2nd’

So as far as you know this posted by you earlier could well not be true?

I dont think you are folowing things very well. I posted "according to reports"...if you dont fully understand what that means you have  a problem

[Mr Gray]

I've noticed - basically anything you don't like .

Then you are not very observant

[faithlilly]

I dont think you are folowing things very well. I posted "according to reports"...if you dont fully understand what that means you have  a problem

So you don’t believe it?

Perhaps you’d like to clarify?

[Mr Gray]

So you don’t believe it?

Perhaps you’d like to clarify?

I think it may well be true or have some truth in it. Not enough information to know for sure. You seem to think I beleive everything that supports my view. You are of course wrong.

[faithlilly]

I think it may well be true or have some truth in it. Not enough information to know for sure. You seem to think I beleive everything that supports my view. You are of course wrong.

Why do you think it is true or has some truth in it if even the newspaper that reported the quote won’t confirm it’s veracity? What evidence are you using to make your decision?

[Mr Gray]

Why do you think it is true or has some truth in it if even the newspaper that reported the quote won’t confirm it’s veracity? What evidence are you using to make your decision?

I havent said I think its true and I cant be bothered to educate you on how to assess evidence. If you dont understand what I have said you wont accept/understand my explanation

[faithlilly]

I havent said I think its true and I cant be bothered to educate you on how to assess evidence. If you dont understand what I have said you wont accept/understand my explanation

So you’re not sure that it’s true but you’re basing your opinion on it. Is that correct?

[Mr Gray]

So you’re not sure that it’s true but you’re basing your opinion on it. Is that correct?

I cant be bothered to make it any clearer to you if you havent understood what I have posted.

[faithlilly]

I cant be bothered to make it any clearer to you if you havent understood what I have posted.

Don’t worry, you have been very clear.

You have posted a cite that neither you nor the paper it appeared in can prove is true but have based your opinion on it. Thank you for being so candid.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Don’t worry, you have been very clear.

You have posted a cite that neither you nor the paper it appeared in can prove is true but have based your opinion on it. Thank you for being so candid.

Gosh, how novel, it's not as if you've ever based your opinion on anything you can't prove is true, like  Smithman being Gerry  for example. 

[Brietta]

There seems to be a common misconception amongst McCann sceptics that McCann supporters are all absolutely convinced of CB's guilt.  Untrue, some of us think he may be involved, but nothing has been revealed yet that makes it a dead cert.

I think it is understood all too well that McCann supporters are well aware of precisely what the presumption of innocence entails;  it is sceptics who appear to misunderstand the concept when it comes to bad mouthing the McCanns.

The Germans are convinced they have evidence implicating Brueckner in whatever it was that befell Madeleine.  I know of no supporter who has overstepped the mark regarding Brueckner's rights when considering the information we are privy to nor am I aware of speculation regarding the information we have not been given.

[Mr Gray]

Don’t worry, you have been very clear.

You have posted a cite that neither you nor the paper it appeared in can prove is true but have based your opinion on it. Thank you for being so candid.

All your opinion so not important to me