New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Miss Taken Identity]

I think it is understood all too well that McCann supporters are well aware of precisely what the presumption of innocence entails;  it is sceptics who appear to misunderstand the concept when it comes to bad mouthing the McCanns.

The Germans are convinced they have evidence implicating Brueckner in whatever it was that befell Madeleine.  I know of no supporter who has overstepped the mark regarding Brueckner's rights when considering the information we are privy to nor am I aware of speculation regarding the information we have not been given.

Can you please clarify what you mean by supporters 'bad mouthing' the McCANNS?  People are entitled to tell the truth- it may not be  a very nice truth but the truth it is and nothing you can say to change that.

shooting the messingers tut tut.

[Brietta]

Can you please clarify what you mean by supporters 'bad mouthing' the McCANNS?  People are entitled to tell the truth- it may not be  a very nice truth but the truth it is and nothing you can say to change that.

shooting the messingers tut tut.

Is there the slightest chance of you making the attempt to tone down your ill informed slurs a notch or two and at least pay lip service to the thread topic.  Thank you in advance.

[Eleanor]

Is there the slightest chance of you making the attempt to tone down your ill informed slurs a notch or two and at least pay lip service to the thread topic.  Thank you in advance.

No Chance, I would say.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Can you please clarify what you mean by supporters 'bad mouthing' the McCANNS?  People are entitled to tell the truth- it may not be  a very nice truth but the truth it is and nothing you can say to change that.

shooting the messingers tut tut.

I’m not sure how much bad mouthing of the McCanns is done by supporters tbh.

[faithlilly]

All your opinion so not important to me

Based on exactly what you posted.

You really should at least try to be consistent in your posts. Members would take you much more seriously if you did.

[Brietta]

No Chance, I would say.

One can only live in hope and await a post which has something pertinent to say about the subject of the thread which is about the prime suspect in the disappearance of a child.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Based on exactly what you posted.

You really should at least try to be consistent in your posts. Members would take you much more seriously if you did.

Stop bullying Davel.

[Eleanor]

One can only live in hope and await a post which has something pertinent to say about the subject of the thread which is about the prime suspect in the disappearance of a child.

No chance of that either, I would say.

[Mr Gray]

Based on exactly what you posted.

You really should at least try to be consistent in your posts. Members would take you much more seriously if you did.

All your opinion so not important to me

[barrier]

No Alibi?  Who wouldn't produce an Alibi if they have one?

No one, a lawyer for an arrested suspect on a csi programme on the beeb Tuesday told the camera a suspect has to say nothing regarding their whereabouts, its up to any prosecution to prove what they claim. Turns out they could.

[barrier]

If there was periods where he fell off of the radar, as there seems to be, then that he did at that time is less significant.

His girlfriend in the Discovery documentary said that he would go missing for periods of time and that his lifestyle turned out to be too chaotic for her.

Hedonistic lifestyle ? something along the lines of I'm on a whiskey diet, and missed three day's last week.

[faithlilly]

Hedonistic lifestyle ? something along the lines of I'm on a whiskey diet, and missed three day's last week.

I think that’s very much what his life was like.

[Mr Gray]

If there was periods where he fell off of the radar, as there seems to be, then that he did at that time is less significant.

His girlfriend in the Discovery documentary said that he would go missing for periods of time and that his lifestyle turned out to be too chaotic for her.

That isn't what she said. She made no mention of him going missing for any periods she said he came home at 2 or 3 in the morning. Looks like you are making things up

[faithlilly]

That isn't what she said. She made no mention of him going missing for any periods she said he came home at 2 or 3 in the morning. Looks like you are making things up

She said that he sometimes slept at the allotment. He therefore would be missing from her home for a period of time.

[Robittybob1]

It was one evening thirteen years ago. Do you know what you did on the 3rd of May 13 years ago because I certainly don’t.

Neither do I.   I have found looking back over a bank statement a good way of jogging one's memory.   Phone records could also do the trick.