New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Lace]

Sadly sometimes it is the only way to get information.   It doesn't mean the information is lies.

[barrier]

Onto the dead dog.  But they managed to dig up the dog and found all sorts under the sod.

2015, the BKA knew about CB in 2013, so do the maths, nothing to suggest images of Madeleine were on there, besides with all the leaks and supposition do you not think if the memory sticks or what ever they were contained anything more than child porn it would not have emerged.

During the search for Inga, police reportedly found six memory sticks with more than 8,000 files, mostly containing pictures and videos of child abuse, in a bag in the ground beneath the body of his dead dog.


Read more: https://metro.co.uk/2020/06/17/madeleine-mccann-suspect-kept-stash-girls-swimming-costumes-motorhome-12862743/?ito=cbshare

[barrier]

Onto the dead dog.  But they managed to dig up the dog and found all sorts under the sod.

Poor imitation of a sod.

[Mr Gray]

2015, the BKA knew about CB in 2013, so do the maths, nothing to suggest images of Madeleine were on there, besides with all the leaks and supposition do you not think if the memory sticks or what ever they were contained anything more than child porn it would not have emerged.

During the search for Inga, police reportedly found six memory sticks with more than 8,000 files, mostly containing pictures and videos of child abuse, in a bag in the ground beneath the body of his dead dog.


Read more: https://metro.co.uk/2020/06/17/madeleine-mccann-suspect-kept-stash-girls-swimming-costumes-motorhome-12862743/?ito=cbshare

the germans said their was nothing relating to Inga on the memory sticks....why not mention Maddie at the same time as taht waas what the programme related to...the fact they didnt leads me to suspect there is. Added to this wolters refused to comment if images related to maddie was found and actually mentioned photos/videos as  a possible type of evidence they might hold.

[faithlilly]

What difference does it make?   He give information to the Police for money,  the Police use informers all the time didn't you know.

Any information is tainted and will be discredited in court.

[barrier]

Sadly sometimes it is the only way to get information.   It doesn't mean the information is lies.

Doesn't mean its true either.

[barrier]

the germans said their was nothing relating to Inga on the memory sticks....why not mention Maddie at the same time as taht waas what the programme related to...the fact they didnt leads me to suspect there is. Added to this wolters refused to comment if images related to maddie was found and actually mentioned photos/videos as  a possible type of evidence they might hold.

It goes back to what I've said before, SY still regard it as a missing person's case, the McCann's treat it the same, who would identify such images if its Madeleine to confirm and if that confirmation came why haven't the McCann's and or SY commented on such.

[Mr Gray]

It goes back to what I've said before, SY still regard it as a missing person's case, the McCann's treat it the same, who would identify such images if its Madeleine to confirm and if that confirmation came why haven't the McCann's and or SY commented on such.

it goes back to what Ive said too...SY regard it as missing persons case becasue Wolters hasnt shared his evidence. the portuguese leaked to amaral they were investigating CB so cannot be trusted

[Eleanor]

Poor imitation of a sod.

That is what Sod means.  Perhaps you didn't know that.

[faithlilly]

it goes back to what Ive said too...SY regard it as missing persons case becasue Wolters hasnt shared his evidence. the portuguese leaked to amaral they were investigating CB so cannot be trusted

Wolter could tell SY without them divulging the information to the PJ, if that was a concern. Why didn’t they?

I was watching a programme on forensics and one of the police officers said that when people talk about the forensics in a case they forget that we are also talking about digital forensics which is a major part of an investigation presently. Therefore when Wolter says that there are no forensics he could quite feasibly talking about digital forensics too such as videos and photographs.

I notice Wolter makes another appearance on the new CBS programme about the case. It’s funny I can’t remember Redwood, Wall et al making themselves quite as available to the media as Wolter. Even Amaral had the professionalism to stay out of the television studios until the case was shelved.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Any information is tainted and will be discredited in court.

It really wasn’t very long ago that sceptics were bemoaning the fact that the McCanns hadn’t used the fund money to put up a reward for information on Madeleine’s fate.  Why was that I wonder if any information received as a result of a reward is automatically tainted and discrredited in court?

[Mr Gray]

Wolter could tell SY without them divulging the information to the PJ, if that was a concern. Why didn’t they?

I was watching a programme on forensics and one of the police officers said that when people talk about the forensics in a case they forget that we are also talking about digital forensics which is a major part of an investigation presently. Therefore when Wolter says that there are no forensics he could quite feasibly talking about digital forensics too such as videos and photographs.

I notice Wolter makes another appearance on the new CBS programme about the case. It’s funny I can’t remember Redwood, Wall et al making themselves quite as available to the media as Wolter. Even Amaral had the professionalism to stay out of the television studios until the case was shelved.

You may convince yourself but that's about it. Wolters has mentioned possible photographic evidence so he doesn't include this in forensics

[barrier]

That is what Sod means.  Perhaps you didn't know that.

A sod is a piece of turf.

[barrier]

You may convince yourself but that's about it. Wolters has mentioned possible photographic evidence so he doesn't include this in forensics

Thats because he has none, wont be long now, around 270 days of concrete evidence, must be a poor mix.

[Mr Gray]

Thats because he has none, wont be long now, around 270 days of concrete evidence, must be a poor mix.

I think your main reason for saying that is that you find it so difficult to accept that you may have been wrong for 13 years