New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Vertigo Swirl]

If dogs alerted to say inside of one of CB's previous residences, it would of course  be meaningless and infer no suspicions on him at all, yeah right, you'd be chomping at the bit..

It would be meaningless without forensic evidence, absolutely correct however many sceptics would have to see such alerts as evidence that Brückner had dead bodies in his house wouldn’t they?

[Anthro]

The photo is of a live MM according to Wolters

I agree, Davel but would that not leave a probability that Madeleine may still be alive? Brückner has no murder record, as far as I know.

[G-Unit]

It would be meaningless without forensic evidence, absolutely correct however many sceptics would have to see such alerts as evidence that Brückner had dead bodies in his house wouldn’t they?

I wonder if the Germans see alerts as meaningless without forensic evidence?

[Vertigo Swirl]

I wonder if the Germans see alerts as meaningless without forensic evidence?

If they have any sense they would. 

[Anthro]

This is my opinion only.
If Mr Wolters and the BKA are wrong that Madeleine has passed, this picture of a girl at about 11 years old at an acting academy in Köln, may be significant. I follow any input, in this case Fia J’s prediction.

[G-Unit]

This is my opinion only.
If Mr Wolters and the BKA are wrong that Madeleine has passed, this picture of a girl at about 11 years old at an acting academy in Köln, may be significant. I follow any input, in this case Fia J’s prediction.

I know that this 'psychic' told a story about Madeleine living in Germany, but did she publish a photo?

[Anthro]

I know that this 'psychic' told a story about Madeleine living in Germany, but did she publish a photo?

No, it was privately obtained.

[Myster]

This is my opinion only.
If Mr Wolters and the BKA are wrong that Madeleine has passed, this picture of a girl at about 11 years old at an acting academy in Köln, may be significant. I follow any input, in this case Fia J’s prediction.

It's not MM, Anthro.

Imagine a line drawn vertically from the centre of the base of the nose to the teeth in both photos -

Left photo: the line would pass over the incisor on the left, i.e. her right incisor.  The nose is also sharply defined and narrow.

Right photo: the line would pass through the diastema (gap) between the two incisors. The nose is broad, flat and upturned - the "McCann nose".

The shape of the nares is also different in both photos.

[Anthro]

It's not MM, Anthro.

Imagine a line drawn vertically from the centre of the base of the nose to the teeth in both photos -

Left photo: the line would pass over the incisor on the left, i.e. her right incisor.  The nose is also sharply defined and narrow.

Right photo: the line would pass through the diastema (gap) between the two incisors. The nose is broad, flat and upturned - the "McCann nose".

The shape of the nares is also different in both photos.

Thank you for the valuable info, Myster.

[Myster]

Thank you for the valuable info, Myster.

I don't know whether it's valuable or not, just my opinion Anthro.  You and others might think differently and see a resemblance.

[John]

The photo is of a live MM according to Wolters

Did I miss something?  Has Wolters changed his position?

[Mr Gray]

Did I miss something?  Has Wolters changed his position?

No hes been consistent... I've followed closely every word he's said.
As regards MM being dead the evidence he says they have.. When he was pressed indicated that although he doesn't have proof of death the evidence  they have would indicate MM would not have survived.
In the Rui Pedro case the PJ found a video of abuse and said it was most likely Rui would not have survived his ordeal... Sad but unfortunately  true

[G-Unit]

The photo is of a live MM according to Wolters

As far as I know Wolters has never said he has a photo of a live MM, do you have a cite?

[Mr Gray]

As far as I know Wolters has never said he has a photo of a live MM, do you have a cite?

If you have read my posts you will understand... You need to read my post in context. I've never said Wolters has a photo but what I have said is there are at least 4..now probly 5 Indications that this is what he may well have


Context..


Words in red could point to the fact they have footage of MM inside a house and want help identifying it and linking it to CB

[G-Unit]

If you have read my posts you will understand... You need to read my post in context. I've never said Wolters has a photo but what I have said is there are at least 4..now probly 5 Indications that this is what he may well have


Context..


Words in red could point to the fact they have footage of MM inside a house and want help identifying it and linking it to CB

You said "The photo is of a live MM according to Wolters". I think you are trying to make your own imaginings into facts, which they clearly are not. Wolters has mentioned possessing no photos of Madeleine at all, so please stop putting your words in his mouth.