New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Eleanor]

Could we please try to be polite.

[Mr Gray]

You said "The photo is of a live MM according to Wolters". I think you are trying to make your own imaginings into facts, which they clearly are not. Wolters has mentioned possessing no photos of Madeleine at all, so please stop putting your words in his mouth.

You are wrong.... So could you provide a cite where Wolters says he has no photos of Madeleine at all.... Over to you
You will find its you putting words in his mouth

[Brietta]

You are wrong.... So could you provide a cite where Wolters says he has no photos of Madeleine at all.... Over to you
You will find its you putting words in his mouth

I think sometimes it is not so much what Wolters says as what he doesn't say from which inference can be made.

[Mr Gray]

I think sometimes it is not so much what Wolters says as what he doesn't say from which inference can be made.

Gunit has specifically said Wolters has mentioned having no photos of Maddie at all.. She's obviously wrong so a cite is in order

[G-Unit]

You are wrong.... So could you provide a cite where Wolters says he has no photos of Madeleine at all.... Over to you
You will find its you putting words in his mouth

Neither has he claimed to have a photo of Madeleine, as your lack of a cite confirms.

[Mr Gray]

Neither has he claimed to have a photo of Madeleine, as your lack of a cite confirms.

Ive never claimed he has whereas you have specifically claimed he has mentioned not having a photo..
Ive seen 6 or 7 indications now that a photo or video is what he had. I have also said I might be wrong.. But from what he has said im more and more inclined to feel im correct

[G-Unit]

Ive never claimed he has whereas you have specifically claimed he has mentioned not having a photo..
Ive seen 6 or 7 indications now that a photo or video is what he had. I have also said I might be wrong.. But from what he has said im more and more inclined to feel im correct

I think indications are what people rely on to try to convince others that their theories are correct.

[Mr Gray]

I think indications are what people rely on to try to convince others that their theories are correct.

You can think what you like...but on this occasion are wrong. I've no wish to convince anyone... Its not important to me. I'm giving my opinion.

The archiving report used the word Indications... Do you think they were trying to convince someone.
I understand enough to know that even if CB was found guilty some wouldn't accept it and still blame the parents.

[Wonderfulspam]

You can think what you like...but on this occasion are wrong. I've no wish to convince anyone... Its not important to me. I'm giving my opinion.

The archiving report used the word Indications... Do you think they were trying to convince someone.
I understand enough to know that even if CB was found guilty some wouldn't accept it and still blame the parents.

He hasn't even been charged with anything so there's no need to worry about that happening.

[Wonderfulspam]

I think sometimes it is not so much what Wolters says as what he doesn't say from which inference can be made.

Yes, just like the other police departments , he isn't saying what the abduction evidence is or how he was able to completely eliminate the possibility of the McCanns involvement.

I think that's rather telling.

[Mr Gray]

Yes, just like the other police departments , he isn't saying what the abduction evidence is or how he was able to completely eliminate the possibility of the McCanns involvement.

I think that's rather telling.

I think he's given enough clues to show he can eliminate the parents and the evidence he has that does.

[Wonderfulspam]

I think he's given enough clues to show he can eliminate the parents and the evidence he has that does.

Like what?

A half hour phone call.

[Mr Gray]

Like what?

A half hour phone call.

Have a look back through my last 100 posts

[Wonderfulspam]

Have a look back through my last 100 posts

I'd rather kill myself, but thanks anyway.

[jassi]

Yes, just like the other police departments , he isn't saying what the abduction evidence is or how he was able to completely eliminate the possibility of the McCanns involvement.

I think that's rather telling.

The germans haven't eliminated the McCanns.
How could they without conducting a through investigation, which they are not empowered to do ?
What they mean is they have taken the word of OG without checking

All IMO