New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[G-Unit]

When people spend 14 years bleating on about the parents’ “neglect”, is that occupying the moral high ground in your opinion?

That is indeed one of the things that some people find inexplicable. The claim by Kate McCann that it felt safe was her explanation for not expecting an abduction, but she never addressed or explained why she ignored the reasons why most people don't leave small children home alone in an unlocked apartment.

Most people stay home or use a babysitter because of those other reasons;

Cholic. Vomiting. Sore nappies. Coughing. Choking. Bad dreams. Overheating. All kinds of thing can distress children. I can't understand why some people have resolutely ignored the fact that the McCanns were perfectly happy to submit their children to those risks and to accept that they might be upset for up to thirty minutes without anyone there to comfort them.

In my opinion occupying the moral high ground includes showing concern at the way those children were abandoned to cope alone with anything which might have upset them.

[Vertigo Swirl]

What's the opposite?  Condoning neglect? That makes you morally superior does it?

No, you are are twisting my words.  I have never condoned child neglect, just as I have not spent 14 years berating the McCanns for their alleged “neglect”.  It is possible to recognise someone has done wrong or made a bad decision and yet not feel the need to constantly harp on about it for years and years and years on social media. 

[Vertigo Swirl]

That is indeed one of the things that some people find inexplicable. The claim by Kate McCann that it felt safe was her explanation for not expecting an abduction, but she never addressed or explained why she ignored the reasons why most people don't leave small children home alone in an unlocked apartment.

Most people stay home or use a babysitter because of those other reasons;

Cholic. Vomiting. Sore nappies. Coughing. Choking. Bad dreams. Overheating. All kinds of thing can distress children. I can't understand why some people have resolutely ignored the fact that the McCanns were perfectly happy to submit their children to those risks and to accept that they might be upset for up to thirty minutes without anyone there to comfort them.

In my opinion occupying the moral high ground includes showing concern at the way those children were abandoned to cope alone with anything which might have upset them.

So you think you occupy the moral high ground then and feel it’s important to keep on reminding us of your superiority?

[Eleanor]

So you think you occupy the moral high ground then and feel it’s important to keep on reminding us of your superiority?

I don't think G Unit understands what the moral high ground is.  But it certainly doesn't include bristling with indignation for 14 years for a mistake for which The McCanns will never forgive themselves.

[jassi]

I don't think G Unit understands what the moral high ground is.  But it certainly doesn't include bristling with indignation for 14 years for a mistake for which The McCanns will never forgive themselves.

Nor should they - IMO

[Vertigo Swirl]

Nor should they - IMO

whether they do or not is none of your business- IMO.

[Eleanor]

Nor should they - IMO

I would certainly not forgive myself.  But then I never even dreamed about an abduction.

[Mr Gray]

That is indeed one of the things that some people find inexplicable. The claim by Kate McCann that it felt safe was her explanation for not expecting an abduction, but she never addressed or explained why she ignored the reasons why most people don't leave small children home alone in an unlocked apartment.

Most people stay home or use a babysitter because of those other reasons;

Cholic. Vomiting. Sore nappies. Coughing. Choking. Bad dreams. Overheating. All kinds of thing can distress children. I can't understand why some people have resolutely ignored the fact that the McCanns were perfectly happy to submit their children to those risks and to accept that they might be upset for up to thirty minutes without anyone there to comfort them.

In my opinion occupying the moral high ground includes showing concern at the way those children were abandoned to cope alone with anything which might have upset them.

It's possible to feel sympathy for both the parents and the children.  On this forum I've seen more sympathy for the paedophile rapist than for the McCanns

[Eleanor]

It's possible to feel sympathy for both the parents and the children.  On this forum I've seen more sympathy for the paedophile rapist than for the McCanns

So have I.  Very strange is that.  If this is the moral high ground then who wants it?

[G-Unit]

So you think you occupy the moral high ground then and feel it’s important to keep on reminding us of your superiority?

I wouldn't dream of claiming I was more moral than others. I just find it fascinating that those who believe in and support the McCanns don't seem to spare a thought for three children left to look after themselves for five evenings. Expecially when it's reported that those children cried during those times, and there was no-one there to offer care and comfort.

[Eleanor]

I wouldn't dream of claiming I was more moral than others. I just find it fascinating that those who believe in and support the McCanns don't seem to spare a thought for three children left to look after themselves for five evenings. Expecially when it's reported that those children cried during those times, and there was no-one there to offer care and comfort.

How many times are they known to have cried while they were alone?

[barrier]

What's the opposite?  Condoning neglect? That makes you morally superior does it?

Then their hope is CB did it, hmmm.

[G-Unit]

How many times are they known to have cried while they were alone?

Isn't once one time too many?

[Eleanor]

Isn't once one time too many?

We aren't even sure if The McCanns were out at the time.

[Brietta]

Then their hope is CB did it, hmmm.

No-one hopes that Brueckner had anything to do with Madeleine's disappearance.  Sometimes evidence may be distasteful ~ do you suppose that is a reason for ignoring its existence and not investigating it with every tool in the box.

At least your nasty post appears to acknowledge that Brueckner is a nasty creature and it took someone nasty to take Madeleine away from all that she knew and loved and all who knew and loved her.