New German suspect in Madeleine McCann mystery disappearance.

[Wonderfulspam]

It's tiresome pointing out the obvious but if they had done a little more investigating they  may well have found out more... They may well have solved the case

If if's & but's were beer & nuts.

Right, so what information did they have pointing to him in May 2007?

Murat wasn't questioned for the sake of it, witnesses pointed the finger, allegedly, so they investigated.

The idea here seems to be the PJ were wrong not to just drag Brueckner in for questioning based on nothing in particular at that time.

[Mr Gray]

If if's & but's were beer & nuts.

Right, so what information did they have pointing to him in May 2007?

Murat wasn't questioned for the sake of it, witnesses pointed the finger, allegedly, so they investigated.

The idea here seems to be the PJ were wrong not to just drag Brueckner in for questioning based on nothing in particular at that time.

So why.. According to amaral... Did they go and knock on his door....

[Wonderfulspam]

So why.. According to amaral... Did they go and knock on his door....

Door to door enquires?

Amaral doesn't say why or when exactly the police visited his property.

'I have been told by colleagues, who are retired like me, that they had come knocking on the door. That person was not at home.' Amaral said.

The police chief, who is being sued by Kate and Gerry McCann, said he did not know if further inquiries were made after this first visit to Brueckner's house in Praia da Luz.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8450247/Portuguese-police-tried-quiz-Madeleine-McCann-suspect-Christian-Brueckner-vanished.html

[Vertigo Swirl]

If if's & but's were beer & nuts.

Right, so what information did they have pointing to him in May 2007?

Murat wasn't questioned for the sake of it, witnesses pointed the finger, allegedly, so they investigated.

The idea here seems to be the PJ were wrong not to just drag Brueckner in for questioning based on nothing in particular at that time.

There was at least one witness statement which give a description of a suspicious man seen next to apartment 5awhich closely matched Bruckner.   Strange that the Pj who knew CB never entertained the idea that he might have been a good match for the sighting.

[Wonderfulspam]

There was at least one witness statement which give a description of a suspicious man seen next to apartment 5awhich closely matched Bruckner.  Strange that the Pj who knew CB never entertained the idea that he might have been a good match for the sighting.

Really?

What were these closely matching features?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Really?

What were these closely matching features?

It’s all been discussed in great detail not that long ago.  I even itemised all the similarities of which there were many. It will probably take me a while to find my post, but really is there any point?  You will only shit on it in your own inimitable fashion.

[Mr Gray]

Door to door enquires?

Amaral doesn't say why or when exactly the police visited his property.

'I have been told by colleagues, who are retired like me, that they had come knocking on the door. That person was not at home.' Amaral said.

The police chief, who is being sued by Kate and Gerry McCann, said he did not know if further inquiries were made after this first visit to Brueckner's house in Praia da Luz.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8450247/Portuguese-police-tried-quiz-Madeleine-McCann-suspect-Christian-Brueckner-vanished.html

That isn't an answer... It's a question

[Wonderfulspam]

It’s all been discussed in great detail not that long ago.  I even itemised all the similarities of which there were many. It will probably take me a while to find my post, but really is there any point?  You will only shit on it in your own inimitable fashion.

By 'shit on it' do you mean point out the description could be similar to many other people?

[Vertigo Swirl]

By 'shit on it' do you mean point out the description could be similar to many other people?

Yes, of course the description could match more than one person, however PdL is not a city, nor even a large town so the number of individuals matching the description would not be in the 100s.  .  The description also closely matched a known criminal.  would there have been any harm in actually finding him and questioning him, or are you satisfied that simply knocking on his door was enough to rule him out?

[Wonderfulspam]

Yes, of course the description could match more than one person, however PdL is not a city, nor even a large town so the number of individuals matching the description would not be in the 100s.  .  The description also closely matched a known criminal.  would there have been any harm in actually finding him and questioning him, or are you satisfied that simply knocking on his door was enough to rule him out?

The police would first have to ascertain the description matched the known criminal, which is utterly subjective & presumably not every police officer in the town had previous dealings with Brueckner & could match him to the description at that time.

[Vertigo Swirl]

The police would first have to ascertain the description matched the known criminal, which is utterly subjective & presumably not every police officer in the town had previous dealings with Brueckner & could match him to the description at that time.

The job of the police is to investigate leads.  The police in PdL went as far as Bruckner’s front door and then gave up.  They were utterly useless so please stop making excuses for them.

[Wonderfulspam]

The job of the police is to investigate leads.  The police in PdL went as far as Bruckner’s front door and then gave up.  They were utterly useless so please stop making excuses for them.

So what was the lead on Brueckner?
Was it the no witnesses placing him at the scene or the there being nothing to suggest he in particular was responsible for Madeleine's disappearance?

[barrier]

So going back to the very beginning of Grange where they themselves did a critical analyse of the files having had them translated they didn't see a link to CB instead focused on the three amigos, we know how that ended, allegedly an informant sat on knowing it was CB since 2008 and then out of the goodness of his heart decided to dob CB in it, yeah right.The legend is writ.

[barrier]

The one thing that can be read in to this is the Germans clearly do not have unequivocal evidence of the demise of Madeleine and their suspects link to it.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10162107/Madeline-McCanns-parents-claim-Cleo-Smiths-rescue-gives-hope.html

[Wonderfulspam]

The one thing that can be read in to this is the Germans clearly do not have unequivocal evidence of the demise of Madeleine and their suspects link to it.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10162107/Madeline-McCanns-parents-claim-Cleo-Smiths-rescue-gives-hope.html

Yeah, the McCanns are clearly unconvinced by Wolters letter, revealing that she's dead, & the concrete evidence Brueckner murdered her.

So, they're sceptics.