Author Topic: “A Laughable Story”  (Read 102095 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline kizzy

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #45 on: August 24, 2020, 01:54:02 PM »
Scared of beeing fitted up by an inept police force who didnt understand the evidence...whose co ordinator had alraedy acted illegally in another investigation

Well, that's a joke as well....seems they made sure the world was watching.

Far too many influential people involved for that to ever happen.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #46 on: August 24, 2020, 02:13:34 PM »
Well, that's a joke as well....seems they made sure the world was watching.

Far too many influential people involved for that to ever happen.

I don't agree....I think it's ridiculous to suggest it's anything else

Offline kizzy

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #47 on: August 24, 2020, 02:32:57 PM »
I don't agree....I think it's ridiculous to suggest it's anything else

You would...But no way was the mccs going to be unfairly treated in anyway ..for some strange reason


We prefer not to discuss this with Stuart Prior: we have the impression that he is only here to accompany the McCanns' interrogations and to prevent their detention. His concern on that subject is obvious.

uring the couple's interrogation, at the beginning of September, the two police forces defined a common strategy: to go forward with the search for evidence concerning the crimes of concealment of a corpse and simulation of abduction; actively pursue investigations to find the body; get to the bottom of the causes of death. We realised very quickly that it was not going to be like that. After the interrogations and the McCanns' return to England, the British police lost interest in the case, giving the impression that their work was finished. We were left to pursue the investigation alone. It would seem that the reasons for their presence in our country were linked more to the McCann couple than to Madeleine. The child disappeared in Portugal, not in Great Britain. For what reasons did they depart immediately after the McCanns? A very hard, yet crucial question to answer.


Offline Mr Gray

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #48 on: August 24, 2020, 02:51:57 PM »
You would...But no way was the mccs going to be unfairly treated in anyway ..for some strange reason


We prefer not to discuss this with Stuart Prior: we have the impression that he is only here to accompany the McCanns' interrogations and to prevent their detention. His concern on that subject is obvious.

uring the couple's interrogation, at the beginning of September, the two police forces defined a common strategy: to go forward with the search for evidence concerning the crimes of concealment of a corpse and simulation of abduction; actively pursue investigations to find the body; get to the bottom of the causes of death. We realised very quickly that it was not going to be like that. After the interrogations and the McCanns' return to England, the British police lost interest in the case, giving the impression that their work was finished. We were left to pursue the investigation alone. It would seem that the reasons for their presence in our country were linked more to the McCann couple than to Madeleine. The child disappeared in Portugal, not in Great Britain. For what reasons did they depart immediately after the McCanns? A very hard, yet crucial question to answer.


I disagree...Kate felt she was about to be arrested..I think her lawyer advised her she might be.
Once arrested it would be very difficult for the UK authorities to interfere in another countries judicial system..you won't accept that but it's s fact.

Theres no point in quoting from amarals book...it's full of falsehoods and for anyone who understand s the case and the evidence has no credibility

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #49 on: August 24, 2020, 04:10:42 PM »
Think you have twisted things a bit here ...the abduction laughable  .. as in its a joke.


meaning

What is the word for not telling the whole truth?
While the noun prevarication is mostly just a fancy way to say "lie," it can also mean skirting around the truth, being vague about the truth, or even delaying giving someone an answer, especially to avoid telling them the whole truth.

The no evidence whatsoever...apart from the mccs saying so abduction ..is a joke IMO
I don't consider the McCanns opinion of what happened to Madeleine in any way relevant.  If they had both dropped dead that night of shock or grief without uttering a word I would still be of the opinion that Madeleine had been abducted.  Why do you and your fellow mirth-seekers find that so laughable?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline kizzy

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #50 on: August 24, 2020, 04:57:26 PM »
I disagree...Kate felt she was about to be arrested..I think her lawyer advised her she might be.
Once arrested it would be very difficult for the UK authorities to interfere in another countries judicial system..you won't accept that but it's s fact.

Theres no point in quoting from amarals book...it's full of falsehoods and for anyone who understand s the case and the evidence has no credibility



Wrong its wrote from the case files...nothing in it is libel...it jas every credibility or it would have been banned.

Now why on earth would her lawyer think she was going to be arrested....if she is as innocent as you say

Offline Lace

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #51 on: August 24, 2020, 05:14:20 PM »
Well, that's a joke as well....seems they made sure the world was watching.

Far too many influential people involved for that to ever happen.

What are you talking about 'made sure the world was watching' ?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #52 on: August 24, 2020, 05:15:22 PM »


Wrong its wrote from the case files...nothing in it is libel...it jas every credibility or it would have been banned.

Now why on earth would her lawyer think she was going to be arrested....if she is as innocent as you say
So many things wrong with this post it’s hard to know where to start.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Lace

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #53 on: August 24, 2020, 05:15:28 PM »
You would...But no way was the mccs going to be unfairly treated in anyway ..for some strange reason


We prefer not to discuss this with Stuart Prior: we have the impression that he is only here to accompany the McCanns' interrogations and to prevent their detention. His concern on that subject is obvious.

uring the couple's interrogation, at the beginning of September, the two police forces defined a common strategy: to go forward with the search for evidence concerning the crimes of concealment of a corpse and simulation of abduction; actively pursue investigations to find the body; get to the bottom of the causes of death. We realised very quickly that it was not going to be like that. After the interrogations and the McCanns' return to England, the British police lost interest in the case, giving the impression that their work was finished. We were left to pursue the investigation alone. It would seem that the reasons for their presence in our country were linked more to the McCann couple than to Madeleine. The child disappeared in Portugal, not in Great Britain. For what reasons did they depart immediately after the McCanns? A very hard, yet crucial question to answer.


So much for the Police on the ground agreeing with his theory.

Offline Lace

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #54 on: August 24, 2020, 05:16:24 PM »


Wrong its wrote from the case files...nothing in it is libel...it jas every credibility or it would have been banned.

Now why on earth would her lawyer think she was going to be arrested....if she is as innocent as you say

It is banned in the UK

Offline G-Unit

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #55 on: August 24, 2020, 05:34:20 PM »
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #56 on: August 24, 2020, 05:35:44 PM »


Wrong its wrote from the case files...nothing in it is libel...it jas every credibility or it would have been banned.

Now why on earth would her lawyer think she was going to be arrested....if she is as innocent as you say

The PJ didn't understand the evidence ...neither did the court.. innocent people get arrested...do you not realise that

Offline Robittybob1

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #57 on: August 24, 2020, 05:48:42 PM »
precisely...well done
We only have your word that the car was ever outside.  No one else saw it, so you might be lying.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #58 on: August 24, 2020, 06:47:18 PM »
We only have your word that the car was ever outside.  No one else saw it, so you might be lying.

The insurance company paid out....they accepted I wasn't...My witness statement was accepted as being truthful

Offline John

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #59 on: August 24, 2020, 07:33:06 PM »
Strange how Police forces have come to the conclusion that she was.

I think you will find that the police are exploring all options.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.