Author Topic: “A Laughable Story”  (Read 101994 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline kizzy

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #135 on: August 26, 2020, 04:49:51 PM »
How reliable is this..where's it from

.the SC judgement is on here to read for yourself...it says what I've said

It's from the Sun...lol

What about the damage THEY did to maddie fgs.


They expected damages for the damage done to there family.




http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4235434/McCanns-ban-Portuguese-lawyer-speaking-press.html

Madeleine McCann's parents ban their lawyer from speaking to the press after Portugal's supreme court insisted they hadn't been proved innocent over their daughter's death

Isabel Duarte thought have been considering a reaction after a failed libel battle
Ex-policeman Goncalo Amaral claimed the couple faked Maddie's abduction
But Kate and Gerry have reportedly ordered her 'not to say anything' about case

By Tracey Kandohla For Mail Online
Published: 17:58, 17 February 2017 | Updated: 18:31, 17 February 2017.

Kate and Gerry McCann have banned their Portuguese lawyer from giving any comment after judges said they had not been cleared over daughter Madeleine's disappearance.
Whilst Isabel Duarte had been carefully considering reaction on their behalf to a failed libel battle against a former police chief 'to protect my clients', they have now warned her: 'Don't say anything!'
Lisbon-based Ms Duarte received a copy of Portugal's Supreme Court judgement 10 days ago – a week after it was made to 'the bitter disappointment' of Maddie's parents and to 'the delight but no surprise' of Goncalo Amaral.
Kate and Gerry McCann have banned their Portuguese lawyer from giving any comment after judges said they had not been cleared over daughter Madeleine's disappearance
But the McCann's have now ordered her not to respond to any media request for their reaction.
Ms Duarte said today: 'We received instructions from the clients not to make any declaration or give public information about the file against Mr Amaral or the case itself.'
The couple lost on appeal their nine-year civil battle against the Portuguese ex-policeman who they had tried to silence for claiming their daughter had been accidentally killed in a holiday apartment in May 2007 and they had covered it up.
They have always vehemently denied any involvement.
Former GP Kate and heart doctor Gerry were ruled out as 'arguidos' – formal suspect - in 2008 but the country's top court said in newly released 76-page dossier that this does not 'equate to proof of innocence', meaning suspicion still hangs over them.
Senior judges claim the investigation into them was only shelved because of lack of evidence.
Whilst Isabel Duarte (right) had been carefully considering reaction on their behalf to a failed libel battle against a former police chief 'to protect my clients', they have now warned her: 'Don't say anything!' Also pictured: Kate McCann (left) and friend Fiona Payne
Their latest order to their lawyer may signal the end of their legal fight against Mr Amaral with no anticipation of them challenging the ruling in the European Court of Human Rights.
The couple, both 48, from Rothley, Leics, have previously gone to extraordinary lengths to stop people close to them talking and even prevented some British newspapers from reporting certain details about the Maddie mystery.
They have also banned all family members and friends from talking to journalists.
Ms Duarte received a copy of Portugal's Supreme Court judgement 10 days ago – a week after it was made to 'the bitter disappointment' of Maddie's parents and to 'the delight but no surprise' of Goncalo Amaral (pictured)
The pair only speak publically on occasional anniversaries of their daughter's disappearance. And Kate does the odd interview as ambassador for Missing People to highlight the charity's work.
Their long-serving spokesman Clarence Mitchell sometimes comments on their behalf but he no longer gets paid for his services.
The McCann's dropped him last year from the Maddie Fund payroll to cut costs but the renowned PR assists them, he says, because 'hopefully it helps in the search for Madeleine.'
The previously reported Supreme Court ruling said there were 'serious concerns' over the theory three-year-old Maddie had been snatched from her bedroom at the Ocean Club apartment in the Algarve's Praia da Luz nearly 10 years ago.
The comments were made in the huge dossier after Mr Goncalo, who headed the hunt for the missing girl, who was handed victory. The McCanns had insisted 'poisonous lies' in his 2008 Maddie book The Truth of the Lie and a TV documentary about the case had been hurtful and libellous.
The Supreme Court is Portugal's highest court but has no criminal authority. Judges added their job was not to decide if the McCanns bore any criminal responsibility over Maddie's disappearance.
And they said it would be wrong to draw any inferences about the couple's guilt or innocence from their ruling.
The McCann's have now ordered Duarte not to respond to any media request for their reaction
After receiving a copy of the ruling Ms Duarte said she would make a comment after 'carefully considering the contents the judges wrote' – which has now been blocked by the McCann's.
Mr Mitchell added: 'I haven't seen the ruling so it would be inappropriate for me to talk about it in any way. It is purely for the lawyers.'
Mr Amaral, 58, was booted off the original Maddie inquiry after criticising British police, and later retired. He insists everything written in his book was already contained in police and court case files which had been made public.
He is now writing a second Maddie book after judges ruled his 'right to freedom of expression' was worthy of greater protection than the McCann's 'right to honour.'
Ms Duarte, speaking before the couple's original libel victory was overturned on appeal: 'It has been proved in the civil file that Mr Amaral earned around 380,000 Euros in one year from the book, which is made of up false stories based on the case.
Kate and Gerry expect compensation for the dreadful damages this book has brought their family.'
-----------------------------------------------

Offline Mr Gray

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #136 on: August 26, 2020, 05:12:37 PM »
What about the damage THEY did to maddie fgs.


They expected damages for the damage done to there family.




http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4235434/McCanns-ban-Portuguese-lawyer-speaking-press.html

Madeleine McCann's parents ban their lawyer from speaking to the press after Portugal's supreme court insisted they hadn't been proved innocent over their daughter's death

Isabel Duarte thought have been considering a reaction after a failed libel battle
Ex-policeman Goncalo Amaral claimed the couple faked Maddie's abduction
But Kate and Gerry have reportedly ordered her 'not to say anything' about case

By Tracey Kandohla For Mail Online
Published: 17:58, 17 February 2017 | Updated: 18:31, 17 February 2017.

Kate and Gerry McCann have banned their Portuguese lawyer from giving any comment after judges said they had not been cleared over daughter Madeleine's disappearance.
Whilst Isabel Duarte had been carefully considering reaction on their behalf to a failed libel battle against a former police chief 'to protect my clients', they have now warned her: 'Don't say anything!'
Lisbon-based Ms Duarte received a copy of Portugal's Supreme Court judgement 10 days ago – a week after it was made to 'the bitter disappointment' of Maddie's parents and to 'the delight but no surprise' of Goncalo Amaral.
Kate and Gerry McCann have banned their Portuguese lawyer from giving any comment after judges said they had not been cleared over daughter Madeleine's disappearance
But the McCann's have now ordered her not to respond to any media request for their reaction.
Ms Duarte said today: 'We received instructions from the clients not to make any declaration or give public information about the file against Mr Amaral or the case itself.'
The couple lost on appeal their nine-year civil battle against the Portuguese ex-policeman who they had tried to silence for claiming their daughter had been accidentally killed in a holiday apartment in May 2007 and they had covered it up.
They have always vehemently denied any involvement.
Former GP Kate and heart doctor Gerry were ruled out as 'arguidos' – formal suspect - in 2008 but the country's top court said in newly released 76-page dossier that this does not 'equate to proof of innocence', meaning suspicion still hangs over them.
Senior judges claim the investigation into them was only shelved because of lack of evidence.
Whilst Isabel Duarte (right) had been carefully considering reaction on their behalf to a failed libel battle against a former police chief 'to protect my clients', they have now warned her: 'Don't say anything!' Also pictured: Kate McCann (left) and friend Fiona Payne
Their latest order to their lawyer may signal the end of their legal fight against Mr Amaral with no anticipation of them challenging the ruling in the European Court of Human Rights.
The couple, both 48, from Rothley, Leics, have previously gone to extraordinary lengths to stop people close to them talking and even prevented some British newspapers from reporting certain details about the Maddie mystery.
They have also banned all family members and friends from talking to journalists.
Ms Duarte received a copy of Portugal's Supreme Court judgement 10 days ago – a week after it was made to 'the bitter disappointment' of Maddie's parents and to 'the delight but no surprise' of Goncalo Amaral (pictured)
The pair only speak publically on occasional anniversaries of their daughter's disappearance. And Kate does the odd interview as ambassador for Missing People to highlight the charity's work.
Their long-serving spokesman Clarence Mitchell sometimes comments on their behalf but he no longer gets paid for his services.
The McCann's dropped him last year from the Maddie Fund payroll to cut costs but the renowned PR assists them, he says, because 'hopefully it helps in the search for Madeleine.'
The previously reported Supreme Court ruling said there were 'serious concerns' over the theory three-year-old Maddie had been snatched from her bedroom at the Ocean Club apartment in the Algarve's Praia da Luz nearly 10 years ago.
The comments were made in the huge dossier after Mr Goncalo, who headed the hunt for the missing girl, who was handed victory. The McCanns had insisted 'poisonous lies' in his 2008 Maddie book The Truth of the Lie and a TV documentary about the case had been hurtful and libellous.
The Supreme Court is Portugal's highest court but has no criminal authority. Judges added their job was not to decide if the McCanns bore any criminal responsibility over Maddie's disappearance.
And they said it would be wrong to draw any inferences about the couple's guilt or innocence from their ruling.
The McCann's have now ordered Duarte not to respond to any media request for their reaction
After receiving a copy of the ruling Ms Duarte said she would make a comment after 'carefully considering the contents the judges wrote' – which has now been blocked by the McCann's.
Mr Mitchell added: 'I haven't seen the ruling so it would be inappropriate for me to talk about it in any way. It is purely for the lawyers.'
Mr Amaral, 58, was booted off the original Maddie inquiry after criticising British police, and later retired. He insists everything written in his book was already contained in police and court case files which had been made public.
He is now writing a second Maddie book after judges ruled his 'right to freedom of expression' was worthy of greater protection than the McCann's 'right to honour.'
Ms Duarte, speaking before the couple's original libel victory was overturned on appeal: 'It has been proved in the civil file that Mr Amaral earned around 380,000 Euros in one year from the book, which is made of up false stories based on the case.
Kate and Gerry expect compensation for the dreadful damages this book has brought their family.'
-----------------------------------------------

How many times do you need to be told that the SC didn't say they hadn't been proved innocent and how many times do you need to be told that just because it's in the paper doesn't make it true

Offline Mr Gray

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #137 on: August 26, 2020, 05:14:39 PM »
What about the damage THEY did to maddie fgs.


They expected damages for the damage done to there family.




http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4235434/McCanns-ban-Portuguese-lawyer-speaking-press.html

Madeleine McCann's parents ban their lawyer from speaking to the press after Portugal's supreme court insisted they hadn't been proved innocent over their daughter's death

Isabel Duarte thought have been considering a reaction after a failed libel battle
Ex-policeman Goncalo Amaral claimed the couple faked Maddie's abduction
But Kate and Gerry have reportedly ordered her 'not to say anything' about case

By Tracey Kandohla For Mail Online
Published: 17:58, 17 February 2017 | Updated: 18:31, 17 February 2017.

Kate and Gerry McCann have banned their Portuguese lawyer from giving any comment after judges said they had not been cleared over daughter Madeleine's disappearance.
Whilst Isabel Duarte had been carefully considering reaction on their behalf to a failed libel battle against a former police chief 'to protect my clients', they have now warned her: 'Don't say anything!'
Lisbon-based Ms Duarte received a copy of Portugal's Supreme Court judgement 10 days ago – a week after it was made to 'the bitter disappointment' of Maddie's parents and to 'the delight but no surprise' of Goncalo Amaral.
Kate and Gerry McCann have banned their Portuguese lawyer from giving any comment after judges said they had not been cleared over daughter Madeleine's disappearance
But the McCann's have now ordered her not to respond to any media request for their reaction.
Ms Duarte said today: 'We received instructions from the clients not to make any declaration or give public information about the file against Mr Amaral or the case itself.'
The couple lost on appeal their nine-year civil battle against the Portuguese ex-policeman who they had tried to silence for claiming their daughter had been accidentally killed in a holiday apartment in May 2007 and they had covered it up.
They have always vehemently denied any involvement.
Former GP Kate and heart doctor Gerry were ruled out as 'arguidos' – formal suspect - in 2008 but the country's top court said in newly released 76-page dossier that this does not 'equate to proof of innocence', meaning suspicion still hangs over them.
Senior judges claim the investigation into them was only shelved because of lack of evidence.
Whilst Isabel Duarte (right) had been carefully considering reaction on their behalf to a failed libel battle against a former police chief 'to protect my clients', they have now warned her: 'Don't say anything!' Also pictured: Kate McCann (left) and friend Fiona Payne
Their latest order to their lawyer may signal the end of their legal fight against Mr Amaral with no anticipation of them challenging the ruling in the European Court of Human Rights.
The couple, both 48, from Rothley, Leics, have previously gone to extraordinary lengths to stop people close to them talking and even prevented some British newspapers from reporting certain details about the Maddie mystery.
They have also banned all family members and friends from talking to journalists.
Ms Duarte received a copy of Portugal's Supreme Court judgement 10 days ago – a week after it was made to 'the bitter disappointment' of Maddie's parents and to 'the delight but no surprise' of Goncalo Amaral (pictured)
The pair only speak publically on occasional anniversaries of their daughter's disappearance. And Kate does the odd interview as ambassador for Missing People to highlight the charity's work.
Their long-serving spokesman Clarence Mitchell sometimes comments on their behalf but he no longer gets paid for his services.
The McCann's dropped him last year from the Maddie Fund payroll to cut costs but the renowned PR assists them, he says, because 'hopefully it helps in the search for Madeleine.'
The previously reported Supreme Court ruling said there were 'serious concerns' over the theory three-year-old Maddie had been snatched from her bedroom at the Ocean Club apartment in the Algarve's Praia da Luz nearly 10 years ago.
The comments were made in the huge dossier after Mr Goncalo, who headed the hunt for the missing girl, who was handed victory. The McCanns had insisted 'poisonous lies' in his 2008 Maddie book The Truth of the Lie and a TV documentary about the case had been hurtful and libellous.
The Supreme Court is Portugal's highest court but has no criminal authority. Judges added their job was not to decide if the McCanns bore any criminal responsibility over Maddie's disappearance.
And they said it would be wrong to draw any inferences about the couple's guilt or innocence from their ruling.
The McCann's have now ordered Duarte not to respond to any media request for their reaction
After receiving a copy of the ruling Ms Duarte said she would make a comment after 'carefully considering the contents the judges wrote' – which has now been blocked by the McCann's.
Mr Mitchell added: 'I haven't seen the ruling so it would be inappropriate for me to talk about it in any way. It is purely for the lawyers.'
Mr Amaral, 58, was booted off the original Maddie inquiry after criticising British police, and later retired. He insists everything written in his book was already contained in police and court case files which had been made public.
He is now writing a second Maddie book after judges ruled his 'right to freedom of expression' was worthy of greater protection than the McCann's 'right to honour.'
Ms Duarte, speaking before the couple's original libel victory was overturned on appeal: 'It has been proved in the civil file that Mr Amaral earned around 380,000 Euros in one year from the book, which is made of up false stories based on the case.
Kate and Gerry expect compensation for the dreadful damages this book has brought their family.'
-----------------------------------------------

They didn't do any damage to Maddie...it looks like that was CB

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #138 on: August 26, 2020, 05:17:01 PM »
How’s Amaral’s second book coming along I wonder?  Shouldn’t be long now...
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline G-Unit

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #139 on: August 26, 2020, 06:15:12 PM »
What about the damage THEY did to maddie fgs.


They expected damages for the damage done to there family.




http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4235434/McCanns-ban-Portuguese-lawyer-speaking-press.html

Madeleine McCann's parents ban their lawyer from speaking to the press after Portugal's supreme court insisted they hadn't been proved innocent over their daughter's death

Isabel Duarte thought have been considering a reaction after a failed libel battle
Ex-policeman Goncalo Amaral claimed the couple faked Maddie's abduction
But Kate and Gerry have reportedly ordered her 'not to say anything' about case

By Tracey Kandohla For Mail Online
Published: 17:58, 17 February 2017 | Updated: 18:31, 17 February 2017.

Kate and Gerry McCann have banned their Portuguese lawyer from giving any comment after judges said they had not been cleared over daughter Madeleine's disappearance.
Whilst Isabel Duarte had been carefully considering reaction on their behalf to a failed libel battle against a former police chief 'to protect my clients', they have now warned her: 'Don't say anything!'
Lisbon-based Ms Duarte received a copy of Portugal's Supreme Court judgement 10 days ago – a week after it was made to 'the bitter disappointment' of Maddie's parents and to 'the delight but no surprise' of Goncalo Amaral.
Kate and Gerry McCann have banned their Portuguese lawyer from giving any comment after judges said they had not been cleared over daughter Madeleine's disappearance
But the McCann's have now ordered her not to respond to any media request for their reaction.
Ms Duarte said today: 'We received instructions from the clients not to make any declaration or give public information about the file against Mr Amaral or the case itself.'
The couple lost on appeal their nine-year civil battle against the Portuguese ex-policeman who they had tried to silence for claiming their daughter had been accidentally killed in a holiday apartment in May 2007 and they had covered it up.
They have always vehemently denied any involvement.
Former GP Kate and heart doctor Gerry were ruled out as 'arguidos' – formal suspect - in 2008 but the country's top court said in newly released 76-page dossier that this does not 'equate to proof of innocence', meaning suspicion still hangs over them.
Senior judges claim the investigation into them was only shelved because of lack of evidence.
Whilst Isabel Duarte (right) had been carefully considering reaction on their behalf to a failed libel battle against a former police chief 'to protect my clients', they have now warned her: 'Don't say anything!' Also pictured: Kate McCann (left) and friend Fiona Payne
Their latest order to their lawyer may signal the end of their legal fight against Mr Amaral with no anticipation of them challenging the ruling in the European Court of Human Rights.
The couple, both 48, from Rothley, Leics, have previously gone to extraordinary lengths to stop people close to them talking and even prevented some British newspapers from reporting certain details about the Maddie mystery.
They have also banned all family members and friends from talking to journalists.

Ms Duarte received a copy of Portugal's Supreme Court judgement 10 days ago – a week after it was made to 'the bitter disappointment' of Maddie's parents and to 'the delight but no surprise' of Goncalo Amaral (pictured)
The pair only speak publically on occasional anniversaries of their daughter's disappearance. And Kate does the odd interview as ambassador for Missing People to highlight the charity's work.
Their long-serving spokesman Clarence Mitchell sometimes comments on their behalf but he no longer gets paid for his services.
The McCann's dropped him last year from the Maddie Fund payroll to cut costs but the renowned PR assists them, he says, because 'hopefully it helps in the search for Madeleine.'
The previously reported Supreme Court ruling said there were 'serious concerns' over the theory three-year-old Maddie had been snatched from her bedroom at the Ocean Club apartment in the Algarve's Praia da Luz nearly 10 years ago.
The comments were made in the huge dossier after Mr Goncalo, who headed the hunt for the missing girl, who was handed victory. The McCanns had insisted 'poisonous lies' in his 2008 Maddie book The Truth of the Lie and a TV documentary about the case had been hurtful and libellous.
The Supreme Court is Portugal's highest court but has no criminal authority. Judges added their job was not to decide if the McCanns bore any criminal responsibility over Maddie's disappearance.
And they said it would be wrong to draw any inferences about the couple's guilt or innocence from their ruling.
The McCann's have now ordered Duarte not to respond to any media request for their reaction
After receiving a copy of the ruling Ms Duarte said she would make a comment after 'carefully considering the contents the judges wrote' – which has now been blocked by the McCann's.
Mr Mitchell added: 'I haven't seen the ruling so it would be inappropriate for me to talk about it in any way. It is purely for the lawyers.'
Mr Amaral, 58, was booted off the original Maddie inquiry after criticising British police, and later retired. He insists everything written in his book was already contained in police and court case files which had been made public.
He is now writing a second Maddie book after judges ruled his 'right to freedom of expression' was worthy of greater protection than the McCann's 'right to honour.'
Ms Duarte, speaking before the couple's original libel victory was overturned on appeal: 'It has been proved in the civil file that Mr Amaral earned around 380,000 Euros in one year from the book, which is made of up false stories based on the case.
Kate and Gerry expect compensation for the dreadful damages this book has brought their family.'
-----------------------------------------------

I said the McCanns silenced people and there's one of their cheerleaders agreeing with me. Perhaps she'd been silenced too.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline kizzy

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #140 on: August 26, 2020, 06:15:35 PM »
They didn't do any damage to Maddie...it looks like that was CB

How many times do you have to fabricate what you think happened?

Wether you like it or not .seems you don't the mccs are not cleared of any involvement in what happened to Maddie

They left her to her fate for a start.

There wasn't enough evidence .not no evidence.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #141 on: August 26, 2020, 06:20:36 PM »
How many times do you have to fabricate what you think happened?

Wether you like it or not .seems you don't the mccs are not cleared of any involvement in what happened to Maddie

They left her to her fate for a start.

There wasn't enough evidence .not no evidence.

Who said the McCanns are not cleared of any involvement...cite . The SC didn't say that

Offline kizzy

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #142 on: August 26, 2020, 06:21:37 PM »
I said the McCanns silenced people and there's one of their cheerleaders agreeing with me. Perhaps she'd been silenced too.

That's what I wondered when I saw  Tracey Kandohla had written it.


Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #143 on: August 26, 2020, 06:24:06 PM »
I said the McCanns silenced people and there's one of their cheerleaders agreeing with me. Perhaps she'd been silenced too.
Does that mean from now on you accept Tracy Kandohla’s word as gospel?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #144 on: August 26, 2020, 06:25:24 PM »
I said the McCanns silenced people and there's one of their cheerleaders agreeing with me. Perhaps she'd been silenced too.

That isn't what you said...at least try and quote your own posts correctly

Offline kizzy

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #145 on: August 26, 2020, 06:28:07 PM »
Who said the McCanns are not cleared of any involvement...cite . The SC didn't say that

Your Laughable D....what do you think suspicion still hangs over them...means

The previously reported Supreme Court ruling said there were 'serious concerns' over the theory three-year-old Maddie had been snatched from her bedroom at the Ocean Club apartment in the Algarve's Praia da Luz nearly 10 years ago.

Former GP Kate and heart doctor Gerry were ruled out as 'arguidos' – formal suspect - in 2008 but the country's top court said in newly released 76-page dossier that this does not 'equate to proof of innocence', meaning suspicion still hangs over them

Offline Mr Gray

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #146 on: August 26, 2020, 06:30:49 PM »
Your Laughable D....what do you think suspicion still hangs over them...means

The previously reported Supreme Court ruling said there were 'serious concerns' over the theory three-year-old Maddie had been snatched from her bedroom at the Ocean Club apartment in the Algarve's Praia da Luz nearly 10 years ago.

Former GP Kate and heart doctor Gerry were ruled out as 'arguidos' – formal suspect - in 2008 but the country's top court said in newly released 76-page dossier that this does not 'equate to proof of innocence', meaning suspicion still hangs over them


You are quoting the newspaper not the the SC.

Everything I have posted re the SC ruling is 100 % correct...the article isnt
« Last Edit: August 26, 2020, 06:33:21 PM by Davel »

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #147 on: August 26, 2020, 06:33:54 PM »
I said the McCanns silenced people and there's one of their cheerleaders agreeing with me. Perhaps she'd been silenced too.
Why do you think she’s been silenced?  Here she is last month, quoting a friend of the McCanns who obviously hasn’t been banned by them from speaking to the media

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8526773/Kate-Gerry-McCann-wont-surprised-Germans-drop-Maddie-case.html
« Last Edit: August 26, 2020, 06:47:46 PM by Vertigo Swirl »
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline G-Unit

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #148 on: August 26, 2020, 09:12:32 PM »
Why do you think she’s been silenced?  Here she is last month, quoting a friend of the McCanns who obviously hasn’t been banned by them from speaking to the media

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8526773/Kate-Gerry-McCann-wont-surprised-Germans-drop-Maddie-case.html

A 'friend' who isn't prepared to be indentified. Why not?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline faithlilly

Re: “A Laughable Story”
« Reply #149 on: August 26, 2020, 09:27:01 PM »
A 'friend' who isn't prepared to be indentified. Why not?

Perhaps they’re not comfortable with the world knowing that their ‘friend’ is paid to be ‘ a friend’ ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?