“A Laughable Story”

[faithlilly]

So you still utterly believe that Madeleine`s parents are complicit in her disappearance?

Do you believe, as some sceptics do, that there is a huge cover up to protect the McCanns.

No I don’t believe that there is a huge coverup and I don’t think many sceptics do. Of course I don’t stalk sceptic groups on Facebook so perhaps you know better.

[Erngath]

No I don’t believe that there is a huge coverup and I don’t think many sceptics do. Of course I don’t stalk sceptic groups on Facebook so perhaps you know better.

Lol.
I do read a wide variety of opinions on Madeleine's disappearance and that does include the many varied sceptic/ conspiracy theories which are abundant on social media.
If you don't believe in the almighty power of the McCanns to thwart the investigation of their involvement in their child's disappearance nor believe there is a huge cover up to prevent their arrest/ conviction ..,...why do you still believe they are guilty of being involved n their child's disappearance?

[G-Unit]

Lol.
I do read a wide variety of opinions on Madeleine's disappearance and that does include the many varied sceptic/ conspiracy theories which are abundant on social media.
If you don't believe in the almighty power of the McCanns to thwart the investigation of their involvement in their child's disappearance nor believe there is a huge cover up to prevent their arrest/ conviction ..,...why do you still believe they are guilty of being involved n their child's disappearance?

Nobody knows what happened to Madeleine McCann. Some have accepted what her parents have said and done without question, others haven't. Some have wondered if there was a cover-up because the authorities appeared to go beyond the call of duty. Others have suggested that there was an organised effort to point the finger at the parents.

I think all possibilities should be considered because no-one has been able to offer proof that Madeleine was abducted. Operation Grange appear to have decided she was and their remit was to investigate an abduction, but they based their views on a by no means certain timeline.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Lol.
I do read a wide variety of opinions on Madeleine's disappearance and that does include the many varied sceptic/ conspiracy theories which are abundant on social media.
If you don't believe in the almighty power of the McCanns to thwart the investigation of their involvement in their child's disappearance nor believe there is a huge cover up to prevent their arrest/ conviction ..,...why do you still believe they are guilty of being involved n their child's disappearance?

Apparently because of the “impossibility of their claims”, though she won’t be drawn on what claims made by the McCanns are in her opinion “impossible “.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Nobody knows what happened to Madeleine McCann. Some have accepted what her parents have said and done without question, others haven't. Some have wondered if there was a cover-up because the authorities appeared to go beyond the call of duty. Others have suggested that there was an organised effort to point the finger at the parents.

I think all possibilities should be considered because no-one has been able to offer proof that Madeleine was abducted. Operation Grange appear to have decided she was and their remit was to investigate an abduction, but they based their views on a by no means certain timeline.

What do the German police think?  And why are you so insulting as to suggest those who believe that abduction is the most logical and plausible explanation accept what the McCanns have said and done “without question”?  Why in your opinion is it not possible to arrive at that conclusion even after questioning every single thing they said or did?

[G-Unit]

What do the German police think?  And why are you so insulting as to suggest those who believe that abduction is the most logical and plausible explanation accept what the McCanns have said and done “without question”?  Why i. your opinion is it not possible to arrive at that conclusion after questioning every single thing they said or did?

From what I've seen the German police think CB might have abducted and killed Madeleine, although there's no evidence that he's ever killed her or anyone else.

Accepting that Madeleine was abducted involves accepting what the McCanns said and did, imo, because the only 'evidence' of abduction was their evidence.

Accepting what the McCanns said and did involves accepting (and excusing) some very strange behaviour imo.

[Admin]

From what I've seen the German police think CB might have abducted and killed Madeleine, although there's no evidence that he's ever killed her or anyone else.

Accepting that Madeleine was abducted involves accepting what the McCanns said and did, imo, because the only 'evidence' of abduction was their evidence.

Accepting what the McCanns said and did involves accepting (and excusing) some very strange behaviour imo.

An excellent point. For many this strange behaviour and refusal to cooperate fully with the original investigation as would be expected of the innocent parents of a missing child is extremely concerning. Are there any other cases anywhere in the world where the parents of a missing child have actively sought to discredit the police chief in charge of the investigation simply because the focus of attention as suspects came their way?

[Vertigo Swirl]

From what I've seen the German police think CB might have abducted and killed Madeleine, although there's no evidence that he's ever killed her or anyone else.

Accepting that Madeleine was abducted involves accepting what the McCanns said and did, imo, because the only 'evidence' of abduction was their evidence.

Accepting what the McCanns said and did involves accepting (and excusing) some very strange behaviour imo.

Well that’s your opinion, and mine is that the “very strange behaviour” is just you seeing stuff you want to see to support your beliefs. 

[G-Unit]

Well that’s your opinion, and mine is that the “very strange behaviour” is just you seeing stuff you want to see to support your beliefs.

Quite the reverse. It was their stories and behaviour which triggered my doubts, not vice versa.

[Admin]

Well that’s your opinion, and mine is that the “very strange behaviour” is just you seeing stuff you want to see to support your beliefs.

So you believe their conduct was conducive of that of innocent parents?

[Brietta]

Lol.
I do read a wide variety of opinions on Madeleine's disappearance and that does include the many varied sceptic/ conspiracy theories which are abundant on social media.
If you don't believe in the almighty power of the McCanns to thwart the investigation of their involvement in their child's disappearance nor believe there is a huge cover up to prevent their arrest/ conviction ..,...why do you still believe they are guilty of being involved n their child's disappearance?

It doesn't let up although noticeably not as many or as virulent  ~  but early days yet.
Underneath the latest newspaper article detailing his sexual assault on on a five year old child we have ...

Snip
jb777777777, cleethorpes, United Kingdom, about 11 hours ago
If he was guilty they'd of got him for maddie by now . Wonder why they haven't then ? Too convenient !

seggy1958, Kettering, United Kingdom, about 11 hours ago
Has he answered 'No comment' to 48 police questions..?

Ms Fandango, Ashford, United Kingdom, 10 hours ago
Oh, I was wondering where this week's Christian Brueckner bashing article was.


I wonder what the relevance is thought to be as the apologists for an abuser take their every opportunity to vent their spleen on Madeleine's parents.

[carlymichelle]

So you believe their conduct was conducive of that of innocent parents?

in kates  book kate  mentioned  maddie  was terrfied of pain  why wpuld a  3 year  old be  scared/terrfied of pain

[Erngath]

in kates  book kate  mentioned  maddie  was terrfied of pain  why wpuld a  3 year  old be  scared/terrfied of pain

Do you believe a child of almost four has never experienced any pain?

[Brietta]

So you believe their conduct was conducive of that of innocent parents?

Seen through the prism of Amaral's jaded eye I might have been seduced as some have been.  But I came into this discussion when most of the evidence was available in the public domain ... then I watched Levy's dog tapes.

It is my belief that there are many people who have many sins to answer for the unprecedented thirteen years of gang vilification of parents whose sin appears to be their insistence on finding out their daughter's fate.

[faithlilly]

Seen through the prism of Amaral's jaded eye I might have been seduced as some have been.  But I came into this discussion when most of the evidence was available in the public domain ... then I watched Levy's dog tapes.

It is my belief that there are many people who have many sins to answer for the unprecedented thirteen years of gang vilification of parents whose sin appears to be their insistence on finding out their daughter's fate.

It is obvious through your many posts that you are want to manipulate the facts to suit your viewpoint and fail to diverge from that even when your mistake is pointed out.

No problem with that just don’t expect us all to be so blind.