Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300232 times)

0 Members and 35 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1125 on: October 05, 2020, 12:20:43 PM »
Mark Saunokonoko summed up the sceptic position..he said he could not take CB seriously as a suspect because of the extensive evidence against the McCanns...such s the dogs...LOL

No sceptic can look at CB with an open mind because they would need to dismiss so much evidence they have accept ed as being significant.

I can see CB being convicted.. certainly not a certainty but who knows..

What will sceptics say then

Miscarriage of justice?

Much worse than that, I bet.

This one is going to run and run for many a long year no matter what.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1126 on: October 05, 2020, 12:23:24 PM »
Mark Saunokonoko summed up the sceptic position..he said he could not take CB seriously as a suspect because of the extensive evidence against the McCanns...such s the dogs...LOL

No sceptic can look at CB with an open mind because they would need to dismiss so much evidence they have accept ed as being significant.

I can see CB being convicted.. certainly not a certainty but who knows..

What will sceptics say then

Miscarriage of justice?
YEs, becasue no matter what DOGS DON'T LIE.  It's the sceptic mantra that cannot ever be forgotten or revised no matter what.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1127 on: October 05, 2020, 12:24:28 PM »
Much worse than that, I bet.

This one is going to run and run for many a long year no matter what.

I think Anthro may be right and CB is part of a network and the network needs to be investigated before evidence is disclosed

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1128 on: October 05, 2020, 12:26:15 PM »
YEs, becasue no matter what DOGS DON'T LIE.  It's the sceptic mantra that cannot ever be forgotten or revised no matter what.

And what Almeida who wrote the interim report said was the main evidence against the mccanns

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1129 on: October 05, 2020, 12:29:02 PM »
I think Anthro may be right and CB is part of a network and the network needs to be investigated before evidence is disclosed

No wonder they are keeping him in Solitary Confinement.  These networks have henchmen everywhere.

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1130 on: October 05, 2020, 12:36:50 PM »
I don't believe a word of what he says

Fair enough same here with HCW

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1131 on: October 05, 2020, 12:42:19 PM »
Fair enough same here with HCW

We will soon see..

Offline The General

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1132 on: October 05, 2020, 12:50:23 PM »
No wonder they are keeping him in Solitary Confinement.  These networks have henchmen everywhere.
I think he's in solitary in case he gets shivved while on Soap Patrol for being a general sex case.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1133 on: October 05, 2020, 12:55:01 PM »
YEs, becasue no matter what DOGS DON'T LIE.  It's the sceptic mantra that cannot ever be forgotten or revised no matter what.

Some dogs perhaps DON'T LIE but it is absolutely a fact that some humans do, particularly when it comes to lying about forensic results which have now reached cult status.

Snip
Among the files is an email dated September 3 2007 written by senior British forensic scientist John Lowe to Detective Superintendent Stuart Prior, head of the UK side of the investigation.

Mr Lowe, from the major incidents team at the Birmingham-based Forensic Science Service (FSS), said it was impossible to conclude whether a sample from the McCanns’ hire car came from their daughter Madeleine.

Four days later Portuguese detectives named Mr and Mrs McCann as “arguidos”, or formal suspects, in the child’s disappearance, citing forensic evidence as grounds for their suspicions.

And they categorically told Mr McCann in interview that his daughter’s DNA had been found in the family’s Renault Scenic hire car.
https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/madeleine-mccann-police-accused-lying-3477989
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1134 on: October 05, 2020, 01:21:34 PM »
We will soon see..

Well, I think it has got to the stage HCW should either put up ...or shut up.

I believe that is exactly what he has done.

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1135 on: October 05, 2020, 02:40:09 PM »
what percentage, out of interest?

About 20% I believe.
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1136 on: October 05, 2020, 02:41:01 PM »
About 20% I believe.

And don't forget CB hasn't even been questioned or charged.  Way to go on this one!
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1137 on: October 05, 2020, 02:43:01 PM »
He doesn't contradict anyone. Any sceptic will need to rubbish HCW because they cannot believe they could possibly be wrong

He does according to Mc's and MET.  Mc's say no evidence MM deceased.  MET treating investigation as missing person.  Your HCW insists deceased.
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1138 on: October 05, 2020, 02:44:19 PM »
Well, I think it has got to the stage HCW should either put up ...or shut up.

I believe that is exactly what he has done.

I wouldn't be surprised to learn his head rolls over this.
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1139 on: October 05, 2020, 02:55:06 PM »
Mark Saunokonoko summed up the sceptic position..he said he could not take CB seriously as a suspect because of the extensive evidence against the McCanns...such s the dogs...LOL

No sceptic can look at CB with an open mind because they would need to dismiss so much evidence they have accept ed as being significant.

I can see CB being convicted.. certainly not a certainty but who knows..

What will sceptics say then

Miscarriage of justice?

You seem to want to put everyone in boxes!  I don't believe CB or Mc's responsible.

Martin Brunt tells us a.n.other has recently been under surveillance.  Friedrich Fulscher tells us he has received some anonymous info that will make Brits fall off their chairs!
« Last Edit: October 05, 2020, 02:59:28 PM by Holly Goodhead »
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?