Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300404 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1395 on: October 14, 2020, 06:41:23 PM »
Which people ?
Are they of any consequence?

Kizzy keeps quoting him..nothing is of any importance here...

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1396 on: October 14, 2020, 07:08:32 PM »
So why does anyone get worked up about him ?
Is it all because he defeated the McCann in the Portuguese Courts ?
It’s because he’s a loathesome prick IMO. How else would you describe someone who deliberately faked pictures of the chief suspect and gave them to the media to make out the German prosecutor had got it all wrong?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline jassi

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1397 on: October 14, 2020, 07:28:16 PM »
It’s because he’s a loathesome prick IMO. How else would you describe someone who deliberately faked pictures of the chief suspect and gave them to the media to make out the German prosecutor had got it all wrong?

He might well be.  Many people are .  So what ?
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1398 on: October 14, 2020, 07:35:53 PM »
I do believe that Madeleine was abducted from her bed.  I don't know if Brueckner was involved, unlike you who is convinced that The McCanns are responsible when you and no one else has been able to prove this in thirteen years.

This is why your thinking is flawed.
So you don't allow for the possibility that Madeleine was on her way over to find her Mum when she was abducted?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1399 on: October 14, 2020, 07:56:49 PM »
So you don't allow for the possibility that Madeleine was on her way over to find her Mum when she was abducted?

You have to explain the open window

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1400 on: October 14, 2020, 08:01:50 PM »
You have to explain the open window
I'm sure Dianne Webster thought it was part of a game being played on Kate.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1401 on: October 14, 2020, 08:04:00 PM »
I'm sure Dianne Webster thought it was part of a game being played on Kate.

Do you think Diane's been hiding Maddie for the past 13 years...

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1402 on: October 14, 2020, 08:12:55 PM »
Do you think Diane's been hiding Maddie for the past 13 years...
"Hiding Maddie", in what way?   Sitting on facts possibly.   What reason did she have to go and play with the raised shutters and then for her fingerprints not to be found on them the day after?  That was suspicious in my books.

So tragic in real life when someone removes evidence from a crimescene, for whatever purpose or even innocently. 
Had her fingerprints and palm prints been found there maybe I wouldn't be so angry about the situation.
« Last Edit: October 14, 2020, 08:20:15 PM by Robittybob1 »
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1403 on: October 14, 2020, 08:22:43 PM »
He might well be.  Many people are .  So what ?
Look, I know you’re keen to shut down any discussion about the man but that ain’t going to happen.  If he does something devious and evil like he did recently people will comment on it and him.  If it doesn’t interest you, look away.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1404 on: October 14, 2020, 08:28:12 PM »
It’s because he’s a loathesome prick IMO. How else would you describe someone who deliberately faked pictures of the chief suspect and gave them to the media to make out the German prosecutor had got it all wrong?
I know that is how it seems but can you prove that beyond a doubt?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1405 on: October 14, 2020, 08:29:26 PM »
I know that is how it seems but can you prove that beyond a doubt?
Yes.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1406 on: October 14, 2020, 08:36:20 PM »
Yes.
That should be headlines in msm if that is the case.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1407 on: October 14, 2020, 08:38:19 PM »
I know that is how it seems but can you prove that beyond a doubt?

This needs to be enforced.

Posters are again reminded to add IMO Infront of any stated opinion.

Admin
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1408 on: October 14, 2020, 08:42:05 PM »
I know that is how it seems but can you prove that beyond a doubt?

Amaral produced images of CB with dreadlocks

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1409 on: October 14, 2020, 08:47:27 PM »
Amaral produced images of CB with dreadlocks
But were they fake? 
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.