Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB

[G-Unit]

Everything changed when Madeleine was abducted from her bed. We all became afraid and a lot of children lost their freedom to roam and the sense of adventure that went with that.

That happened long before 2007.

[Vertigo Swirl]

That happened long before 2007.

I adjusted my behaviour as far as my children’s exposure to risk was concerned as a result of the case.

[G-Unit]

I adjusted my behaviour as far as my children’s exposure to risk was concerned as a result of the case.

In what way(s)?

[kizzy]

You've actually got it quite wrong as post after post proves.

The Policia Judiciaria in their final report found no evidence against the McCanns.

The Portuguese Prosecutors have detailed in their archiving document that the 'evidence' which was used to make the McCanns arguidos was not evidence at all.

Apparently you seem to think you know better than British, Portuguese and German police who after many years of investigation now have Brueckner as their prime suspect in Madeleine McCann's abduction.

Please note ... Madeleine's parents have no locus in deciding what investigative strategy the police choose to follow or who the police have evidence enough to make suspects in a crime. 
So don't you think it is time to give up on this absolute nonsense of "the mccs abduction senario (sic)".  Which is nothing at all to do with the McCanns.

In reality it is the German police scenario - the British police scenario - the Portuguese police scenario. 

Which answers the question you have posed.

There is no evidence circumstantial or otherwise regarding Madeleine's parents ~ but there is sufficient evidence to make Brueckner the prime suspect in Madeleine's disappearance.

There is no evidence circumstantial or otherwise regarding Madeleine's parents ~ but there is sufficient evidence to make Brueckner the prime suspect in Madeleine's disappearance.

Really ...so what is it .

DO OR DIE Madeleine McCann cops need massive breakthrough in next 10 weeks or case against suspect Christian B could ‘evaporate’

[Mr Gray]

There is no evidence circumstantial or otherwise regarding Madeleine's parents ~ but there is sufficient evidence to make Brueckner the prime suspect in Madeleine's disappearance.

Really ...so what is it .

DO OR DIE Madeleine McCann cops need massive breakthrough in next 10 weeks or case against suspect Christian B could ‘evaporate’

You are quoting the Sun who are quoting a source close to the investigation in PDL....the investigation is centred in Germany. Its important to check the source of your information

[kizzy]

You are quoting the Sun who are quoting a source close to the investigation in PDL....the investigation is centred in Germany. Its important to check the source of your information

Well seems IMO they are not working altogether like some seem to think.


''It is no secret that the Portuguese have a different theory of what happened to the German BKA (federal police),” he said.

IMO also you don't need a source to tell you they have nothing - you just need common sense.

They give it their best shot nearly 5 months ago....you can't find what isnt there.

[Mr Gray]

Well seems IMO they are not working altogether like some seem to think.


''It is no secret that the Portuguese have a different theory of what happened to the German BKA (federal police),” he said.

IMO also you don't need a source to tell you they have nothing - you just need common sense.

They give it their best shot nearly 5 months ago....you can't find what isnt there.

Al your opinion...I'd rather listen to HCW

[kizzy]

Al your opinion...I'd rather listen to HCW

I know you would lol

[Mr Gray]

I know you would lol

Why should that surprise you..or do you claim to know more than the German prosecutor

[Eleanor]

If Brueckner's Lawyer isn't frightfully careful his client could finish up with a Murder Conviction by Default.

[Wonderfulspam]

You've actually got it quite wrong as post after post proves.

The Policia Judiciaria in their final report found no evidence against the McCanns.

The Portuguese Prosecutors have detailed in their archiving document that the 'evidence' which was used to make the McCanns arguidos was not evidence at all.

Apparently you seem to think you know better than British, Portuguese and German police who after many years of investigation now have Brueckner as their prime suspect in Madeleine McCann's abduction.

Please note ... Madeleine's parents have no locus in deciding what investigative strategy the police choose to follow or who the police have evidence enough to make suspects in a crime. 
So don't you think it is time to give up on this absolute nonsense of "the mccs abduction senario (sic)".  Which is nothing at all to do with the McCanns.

In reality it is the German police scenario - the British police scenario - the Portuguese police scenario. 

Which answers the question you have posed.

There is no evidence circumstantial or otherwise regarding Madeleine's parents ~ but there is sufficient evidence to make Brueckner the prime suspect in Madeleine's disappearance.

Yes that's correct.
When you ignore the evidence against the McCanns then there isn't any evidence against the McCanns.

[G-Unit]

Yes that's correct.
When you ignore the evidence against the McCanns then there isn't any evidence against the McCanns.

That which can't be ignored is 'explained', 'excused' or denied.

[Eleanor]

That which can't be ignored is 'explained', 'excused' or denied.

Sceptics are very good at this.

[kizzy]

Why should that surprise you..or do you claim to know more than the German prosecutor

Only he is looking in the wrong place IMO

[Mr Gray]

Only he is looking in the wrong place IMO

I don't think he is. To me everything he has said makes perfect sense. Imo you can't accept it because it contradicts everything you have believed in the last 13 years.