Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300394 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1605 on: October 18, 2020, 01:30:55 PM »
Im confident HCW has evidence/proof of abduction...whether he can tie CB to it is another matter...we will see.

My level of  confidence hasnt changed...my approach has.




Wolters can't show his suspect killed Madeleine,the new approach is a wise one.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1606 on: October 18, 2020, 01:34:07 PM »
Wolters can't show his suspect killed Madeleine,the new approach is a wise one.

But if he can show Maddie was abducted the sceptic campaign is destroyed

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1607 on: October 18, 2020, 01:38:36 PM »
But if he can show Maddie was abducted the sceptic campaign is destroyed

SY certainly can't so why should Wolters be able to?
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1608 on: October 18, 2020, 01:40:40 PM »
You clearly don't have a clue about evidence in this case. He has nothing as you will soon find out from the Bluffer! Concrete evidence  *%87

Not a good idea to suggest I haven't got a clue when your own ideas I consider to be barmy...we will soon know who's right

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1609 on: October 18, 2020, 01:41:52 PM »
Cannot wait it's long overdue.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1610 on: October 18, 2020, 01:49:45 PM »
SY certainly can't so why should Wolters be able to?

Images... videos on memory stick

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1611 on: October 18, 2020, 01:57:57 PM »
Images... videos on memory stick

Past history doesn't mean the present hypothesis would be correct.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1612 on: October 18, 2020, 02:02:21 PM »
Past history doesn't mean the present hypothesis would be correct.

The Germans may have images of an abducted Maddie...

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1613 on: October 18, 2020, 02:11:17 PM »
The Germans may have images of an abducted Maddie...

If,buts and maybe's, you're better than that.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1614 on: October 18, 2020, 02:14:41 PM »
Early June.

Mr Wolters told Sky News: “At the moment we also don’t have enough proof for a trial at court, but we have some evidence that the suspect has done the deed.

“That’s why we need more information from people, especially places he has lived so we can target these places especially and search there for Madeleine.”


Which he clearly struggles with when: A day or two days ago.

DO OR DIE Madeleine McCann cops need massive breakthrough in next 10 weeks or case against suspect Christian B could ‘evaporate’


This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1615 on: October 18, 2020, 02:22:56 PM »
Early June.

Mr Wolters told Sky News: “At the moment we also don’t have enough proof for a trial at court, but we have some evidence that the suspect has done the deed.

“That’s why we need more information from people, especially places he has lived so we can target these places especially and search there for Madeleine.”


Which he clearly struggles with when: A day or two days ago.

DO OR DIE Madeleine McCann cops need massive breakthrough in next 10 weeks or case against suspect Christian B could ‘evaporate’


did that news come from HCW?  If not who said it?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1616 on: October 18, 2020, 02:46:15 PM »
Early June.

Mr Wolters told Sky News: “At the moment we also don’t have enough proof for a trial at court, but we have some evidence that the suspect has done the deed.

“That’s why we need more information from people, especially places he has lived so we can target these places especially and search there for Madeleine.”


Which he clearly struggles with when: A day or two days ago.

DO OR DIE Madeleine McCann cops need massive breakthrough in next 10 weeks or case against suspect Christian B could ‘evaporate’

[/b]

I think thats complete tripe...did you read what the source was...a source close to the investigation in PDL...utter tripe

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1617 on: October 18, 2020, 02:48:45 PM »
If,buts and maybe's, you're better than that.

If I dont know for certain...I say may....that makes me better than others. Thats the way the evidence points ...not just imo...

I think there is next to no chance that HCW does not have convincing evidence of the death of MM

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1618 on: October 18, 2020, 03:15:40 PM »
I think thats complete tripe...did you read what the source was...a source close to the investigation in PDL...utter tripe
Probably from Rent-A-Gob.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1619 on: October 18, 2020, 04:51:43 PM »
I think thats complete tripe...did you read what the source was...a source close to the investigation in PDL...utter tripe

Just because you think it is tripe doesn't mean it is.

You rubbish everything that goes against abduction anyway.

You should start thinking maybe you have been taken in by what CW has tried to convince the public with.


Afterall as I have said before that is what prosecutors are trained to do ..convince public/jury or whoever the audience is.