If you read back you will see that it was part of a discussion about tracing people who use the dark web, so relevant to Brueckner being traced. Although in my opinion a lot of what has been said about him can be traced to his former 'friends', particularly Michael Tatschl.
https://nationalcybersecuritynews.today/i-know-he-did-it-christian-brueckners-friend-says-the-german-is-guilty-of-taking-madeline-mccann-deepweb-darkweb-hacker/
We do know that Brueckner has been active on the dark web in connection with his activities along with other perverts, many of whom have been tracked down.
And in my opinion that is relevant.
Dark web child abuse: Hundreds arrested across 38 countriesPublished16 October 2019
More than 300 people have been arrested following the take-down of one of the world's "largest dark web child porn marketplaces", investigators said.The site had more than 200,000 videos which had collectively been downloaded more than a million times.
It was shut down last year after a UK investigation into a child sex offender uncovered its existence.
But on Wednesday, officials revealed that 337 suspected users had been arrested across 38 countries.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-50073092I am intrigued that it was found necessary to highlight any of these perverts in general but that you specifically chose to highlight the case of the perpetrator you did.
I thought it might have been a subliminal nod at comparing doctors and the paedophile. It couldn't possibly be that though, could it?