Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300624 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2220 on: October 29, 2020, 07:51:54 PM »
I'm reelly reelly sorry.  I was joking.

France is going into total lockdown again tomorrow which is pure joy to me as I don't have to go shopping at all at all, so I got a bit carried away.

You can all look forward to me being here 24/7 instead of just 20/7.

Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2221 on: October 29, 2020, 08:03:07 PM »
That's not the only thing the PJ were denied by the English police in this case.  It all stinks of a conspiracy imo.

I disagree.  In my opinion Amaral displayed a great deal of paranoia in all directions.  I believe he was nearly as disenchanted with the hierarchy of the Policia Judiciaria as much as he was with everything else;  don't forget, they too besmirched his honour when they had the temerity to sack him from the McCann investigation.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2222 on: October 29, 2020, 09:39:10 PM »
I disagree.  In my opinion Amaral displayed a great deal of paranoia in all directions.  I believe he was nearly as disenchanted with the hierarchy of the Policia Judiciaria as much as he was with everything else;  don't forget, they too besmirched his honour when they had the temerity to sack him from the McCann investigation.

Oh what I won’t give for a yawn emoji right about now.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2223 on: October 29, 2020, 10:04:13 PM »
Oh what I won’t give for a yawn emoji right about now.
I think use of  emojis can be a bit puerile at times ~ but we do have access to a sleepy one ~  6&%5% Maybe you will find it reshut upl.

"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2224 on: October 29, 2020, 10:32:25 PM »

I think the PJ were just useless

If only they had been just useless.  Criminally Negligent more like.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2225 on: October 29, 2020, 11:10:56 PM »
An interesting snippet in the recent CdM report that appears to have been overlooked...

“Case reopened
After being archived, the case was reopened and the case was sent to the Porto’s PJ who became in charge of reading all the documents. The objective was to try to find new lines of investigation. It was only then that the hypothesis of the girl's abduction and death gained strength”.

For the full translated report you will have to seek it out on a sceptic’s blog (name begins with a T). 

"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2226 on: October 29, 2020, 11:40:57 PM »
An interesting snippet in the recent CdM report that appears to have been overlooked...

“Case reopened
After being archived, the case was reopened and the case was sent to the Porto’s PJ who became in charge of reading all the documents. The objective was to try to find new lines of investigation. It was only then that the hypothesis of the girl's abduction and death gained strength”.

For the full translated report you will have to seek it out on a sceptic’s blog (name begins with a T).

Well there's half an hour I am never going to get back.

Offline Angelo222

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2227 on: October 30, 2020, 12:04:41 AM »
I'm reelly reelly sorry.  I was joking.

France is going into total lockdown again tomorrow which is pure joy to me as I don't have to go shopping at all at all, so I got a bit carried away.

You can all look forward to me being here 24/7 instead of just 20/7.

Looks like I'm with you Eleanor.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Angelo222

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2228 on: October 30, 2020, 12:06:03 AM »
I disagree.  In my opinion Amaral displayed a great deal of paranoia in all directions.  I believe he was nearly as disenchanted with the hierarchy of the Policia Judiciaria as much as he was with everything else;  don't forget, they too besmirched his honour when they had the temerity to sack him from the McCann investigation.

I believe he effectively sacked himself by speaking out about the useless English police.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Angelo222

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2229 on: October 30, 2020, 12:07:10 AM »
Oh what I won’t give for a yawn emoji right about now.

Will this do?   %#&%4%
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2230 on: October 30, 2020, 12:11:51 AM »
Looks like I'm with you Eleanor.

Who needs sleep when there is so much excitement going on?

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2231 on: October 30, 2020, 12:19:17 AM »
I think use of  emojis can be a bit puerile at times ~ but we do have access to a sleepy one ~  6&%5% Maybe you will find it reshut upl.

Oh I agree, the use of emojis can be puerile but they can also be useful when words fail to convey the mind numbing reality of another Amaral post.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2233 on: October 30, 2020, 12:22:24 AM »
Well there's half an hour I am never going to get back.

You’d think we’d learn !
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2234 on: October 30, 2020, 12:40:09 AM »
You’d think we’d learn !

I know.  What was it Oscar Wilde said about Hope Over Experience?