Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB

[barrier]

Oh what I won’t give for a yawn emoji right about now.

Put them on ignore,the flotsam and jetsam just floats on by.

[Vertigo Swirl]

It certainly seems some people are keen to put this on ignore - I wonder why?

Case reopened
After being archived, the case was reopened and the case was sent to the Porto’s PJ who became in charge of reading all the documents. The objective was to try to find new lines of investigation. It was only then that the hypothesis of the girl's abduction and death gained strength”.

[Robittybob1]

It certainly seems some people are keen to put this on ignore - I wonder why?

Case reopened
After being archived, the case was reopened and the case was sent to the Porto’s PJ who became in charge of reading all the documents. The objective was to try to find new lines of investigation. It was only then that the hypothesis of the girl's abduction and death gained strength”.

Where did you get that text from?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Where did you get that text from?

See my previous post.

[Robittybob1]

It certainly seems some people are keen to put this on ignore - I wonder why?

Case reopened
After being archived, the case was reopened and the case was sent to the Porto’s PJ who became in charge of reading all the documents. The objective was to try to find new lines of investigation. It was only then that the hypothesis of the girl's abduction and death gained strength”.

I have often wondered how that can be done.  How much time have they got to read the file?  Do you have a team of people doing that task,  How do they break up sections and hand them out?  You'd think it could like the forum and if we all worked together we'd resolve the case, but we don't, we seem to be arguing and discussing stuff that was being discussed 13 years ago.

[Mr Gray]

I have often wondered how that can be done.  How much time have they got to read the file?  Do you have a team of people doing that task,  How do they break up sections and hand them out?  You'd think it could like the forum and if we all worked together we'd resolve the case, but we don't, we seem to be arguing and discussing stuff that was being discussed 13 years ago.

Do you really think this case could have been resolved by this forum...when two posters you seem to admire think the dog alerts are important and evidential.
It isn't a matter of arguing...it's a matter of understanding the evidence

[Robittybob1]

Do you really think this case could have been resolved by this forum...when two posters you seem to admire think the dog alerts are important and evidential.
It isn't a matter of arguing...it's a matter of understanding the evidence

The point I was making was whether the same division would occur within the PJ if they were reading through the file.

If the forum members all started from a position of not being for or against, maybe we could have resolved some part of the case.

[Mr Gray]

The point I was making was whether the same division would occur within the PJ if they were reading through the file.

If the forum members all started from a position of not being for or against, maybe we could have resolved some part of the case.

What makes people for and against is their view of the evidence....and respite discussion that hasn't changed ....and probably never will

[Eleanor]

What makes people for and against is their view of the evidence....and respite discussion that hasn't changed ....and probably never will

Especially if some comments are On Ignore.  I will never be able to understand this.  How can you have a discussion and sift facts if you can't see what some people are saying?

[Robittybob1]

Especially if some comments are On Ignore.  I will never be able to understand this.  How can you have a discussion and sift facts if you can't see what some people are saying?

You can see their posts if you want to, but the real benefit is they can't private message you if you have them on ignore.

[Eleanor]

You can see their posts if you want to, but the real benefit is they can't private message you if you have them on ignore.

Why would I want to stop them PMing me?  My experiences on that one have always been good.

[Robittybob1]

Why would I want to stop them PMing me?  My experiences on that one have always been good.

If I was to get a nasty or just an annoying PM and I click reply and spend a few minutes typing up a reply, and try and send it.  If they've blocked me my reply doesn't get through.  If I block them they can't send anything in the first instance.
Anyone who that I find has blocked me, I'll block them back.

[G-Unit]

I believe he effectively sacked himself by speaking out about the useless English police.

In my opinion his comment had some truth in it.

[Brietta]

I believe he effectively sacked himself by speaking out about the useless English police.

That amongst a lot of other issues.

If memory serves me well he was furiously denouncing a communication which had been forwarded I would imagine via the proper channels from Prince Charles's office.

An email concerning the investigation had been received suggesting that a disgruntled former Ocean Club employee had kidnapped Madeleine in revenge for being sacked.
So instead of doing what would be the norm of passing that information to an underling to be looked into Amaral was enraged and mouthed off about it to a journalist over a late night dinner.

Very unprofessional of him to say the least.  Nobody put a foot wrong in this episode with the exception of Amaral.

• the Prince's office passed on information received to the appropriate investigative authorities concerning a crime
• instead of investigating it Amaral gossiped negatively and I believe furiously about it to a journalist
• the journalist did what journalists do and wrote it up
• Amaral's bosses sacked him and in my opinion that was just a reaction to the last straw in one embarrassment after another in a botched investigation

I wonder if the information sent from Britain was ever properly investigated at the time or did it take until the reopening of Madeleine's case by the Portuguese for it to be looked at?

[Lace]

That's not the only thing the PJ were denied by the English police in this case.  It all stinks of a conspiracy imo.

GP statement -  www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/PH-HU.htm