Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300595 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2325 on: October 31, 2020, 05:13:36 PM »
Evidence can be open to interpretation. IMO.

No abductor has been found in the Ben Needham case either so I guess that means it’s evidence his family dunnit too by your  (completely twisted) logic.
« Last Edit: October 31, 2020, 05:30:44 PM by Brietta »
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2326 on: October 31, 2020, 05:19:36 PM »
I'd cross the Smith's out.   One said the person had light brown hair!!  Not a tourist!!   Martin Smith said he looked like Gerry by the way he carried his son off the plane,  he carried his son off the plane the same as millions of parents have.

Silly Kate,  open the window to stage an abduction and didn't wipe her finger prints off the glass [she's not that stupid]

The last one 'shifty parents'  is just the way you portray them,  all the people who lived around the McCann's said they were lovely people,  you don't know them they do.

Weren't most of those who spoke about the McCanns family or friends?

Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2327 on: October 31, 2020, 05:20:18 PM »
No abductor has been found in the Ben Needham case either so I guess that means it’s evidence his family dunnit too by your  (completely twisted) logic.

His disappearance is a little suspicious.

Why would an abductor steal Ben's wet shorts from the washing line?

 
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2328 on: October 31, 2020, 05:21:33 PM »
His disappearance is a little suspicious.

Why would an abductor steal Ben's wet shorts from the washing line?
So you believe his family was involved in a cover up then?  That figures.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2329 on: October 31, 2020, 05:25:03 PM »
So you believe his family was involved in a cover up then?  That figures.

Well, I don't see how we can rule it out since Ben hasn't been found.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2330 on: October 31, 2020, 05:33:51 PM »
Then list what you think it is.  Shouldn't be too difficult for you.  You did start the thread.

Far too much to list.but.


Well, in my opinion, and others a tragic accident that could ruin the mccs I believe.carreer/family etc.

 Put them together and you have means, motive and opportunity.

Why who would want to abduct Maddie and take all that risk why would a pedo do that.

Portugal I found in 2005 had a lot of poverty shacks on beaches between Vilamoura and Albefura.

Children were freely running about, some begging. yet you never hear of them being abducted.

If someone wanted Maddie why would they emply a pedo to take her.

This case stinks and always has done. too much UK interference to ever think it was just a group of professional people on holiday.

Where a unique abduction takes place still not a shread of evidence to prove that Maddie was abducted.

Apart from a so-called open window, when there was an open door next to her bed leading to a car park


Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2331 on: October 31, 2020, 05:40:02 PM »
Weren't most of those who spoke about the McCanns family or friends?

It is usual for character references to be requested from individuals who know the people concerned. 

The fact that for thirteen+ years individuals who know nothing at all about this family have seen fit to traduce them might be rather clouding your judgement on that.

Who knows you best ~ your family and friends or some stranger on the internet?  It's a no brainer IMO.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2332 on: October 31, 2020, 05:47:46 PM »
Far too much to list.but.


Well, in my opinion, and others a tragic accident that could ruin the mccs I believe.carreer/family etc.

 Put them together and you have means, motive and opportunity.

Why who would want to abduct Maddie and take all that risk why would a pedo do that.

Portugal I found in 2005 had a lot of poverty shacks on beaches between Vilamoura and Albefura.

Children were freely running about, some begging. yet you never hear of them being abducted.

If someone wanted Maddie why would they emply a pedo to take her.

This case stinks and always has done. too much UK interference to ever think it was just a group of professional people on holiday.

Where a unique abduction takes place still not a shread of evidence to prove that Maddie was abducted.

Apart from a so-called open window, when there was an open door next to her bed leading to a car park
"Far too much to list.but."

Not at all.  Do keep it coming.  I'm finding your explanatory post absolutely riveting ~ I look forward to the rest.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2333 on: October 31, 2020, 05:54:41 PM »
Well, I don't see how we can rule it out since Ben hasn't been found.
I see.  So if a child disappears and is never found and nobody ever charged with an abduction, then it’s fine to assume the parents did it, great logic.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2334 on: October 31, 2020, 06:05:02 PM »
Far too much to list.but.


Well, in my opinion, and others a tragic accident that could ruin the mccs I believe.carreer/family etc.

 Put them together and you have means, motive and opportunity.

Why who would want to abduct Maddie and take all that risk why would a pedo do that.

Portugal I found in 2005 had a lot of poverty shacks on beaches between Vilamoura and Albefura.

Children were freely running about, some begging. yet you never hear of them being abducted.

If someone wanted Maddie why would they emply a pedo to take her.

This case stinks and always has done. too much UK interference to ever think it was just a group of professional people on holiday.

Where a unique abduction takes place still not a shread of evidence to prove that Maddie was abducted.

Apart from a so-called open window, when there was an open door next to her bed leading to a car park

Far too much to list......


But the truth is you can't list any...why not be honest and admit it
« Last Edit: October 31, 2020, 06:32:04 PM by Davel »

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2335 on: October 31, 2020, 07:12:34 PM »
I see.  So if a child disappears and is never found and nobody ever charged with an abduction, then it’s fine to assume the parents did it, great logic.

I don't see why not.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2336 on: October 31, 2020, 07:13:53 PM »
I don't see why not.
It’s good sport isn’t it?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Angelo222

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2337 on: October 31, 2020, 11:34:55 PM »
Oh come, come now....while technically that’s true the situation was a little more nuanced. lMO, the parents used their friends refusal to participate to scupper the reconstition.

I agree.  Had they really wanted to assist the PJ in the investigation of their daughter's mysterious disappearance they would have prevailed upon their friends to take part. But in the event not a sound.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2338 on: October 31, 2020, 11:41:33 PM »
I agree.  Had they really wanted to assist the PJ in the investigation of their daughter's mysterious disappearance they would have prevailed upon their friends to take part. But in the event not a sound.
Do you expect the McCanns to broadcast all communications between themselves and their friends to the world out of interest?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2339 on: October 31, 2020, 11:49:30 PM »
I agree.  Had they really wanted to assist the PJ in the investigation of their daughter's mysterious disappearance they would have prevailed upon their friends to take part. But in the event not a sound.

The fact that Kate remained very good friends with Fiona Payne says it all. If any of my friends had refused to take part in any part of a police enquiry that was looking for my daughter they’d no longer be friends.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?