Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300564 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2385 on: November 03, 2020, 12:07:03 PM »
Usually in the Uk its the police who involve the media...are you not aware of that.

Well seems HCW has spoken to the sun. Tu Tut Tut


MADELEINE McCann's parents face fresh heartache after prosecutors revealed they would not be charging the prime suspect until next year at the earliest.

Convicted rapist and paedophile Christian B, 43, was identified as the man responsible for the three-year old's kidnap and murder by the German authorities in June.

Kate and Gerry hoped it would mark the end of their 13 year agony at not knowing what had happened to their beloved daughter but now their hopes have been dashed.

Speaking exclusively to The Sun, prosecutor Hans Christian Wolters admitted leads had dried up and there would be no developments this year, with charges unlikely before the Spring and only if they find more evidence.

He said: ''I cannot say how long our investigation will go on for but I know there will be no developments this year, in 2020. We had hoped to charge him but that has not been possible.

''Maybe we hope to have something by the Spring of 2021, maybe it could take longer but certainly nothing this year.

''We have some evidence against our suspect but it is not strong enough. We have proof that he was involved and that he killed Madeleine but it's not strong enough to charge him.



https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/13086481/madeleine-mccann-heartache-suspect-charged-next-year/

 

Offline jassi

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2386 on: November 03, 2020, 12:15:10 PM »
Well seems HCW has spoken to the sun. Tu Tut Tut


MADELEINE McCann's parents face fresh heartache after prosecutors revealed they would not be charging the prime suspect until next year at the earliest.

Convicted rapist and paedophile Christian B, 43, was identified as the man responsible for the three-year old's kidnap and murder by the German authorities in June.

Kate and Gerry hoped it would mark the end of their 13 year agony at not knowing what had happened to their beloved daughter but now their hopes have been dashed.

Speaking exclusively to The Sun, prosecutor Hans Christian Wolters admitted leads had dried up and there would be no developments this year, with charges unlikely before the Spring and only if they find more evidence.

He said: ''I cannot say how long our investigation will go on for but I know there will be no developments this year, in 2020. We had hoped to charge him but that has not been possible.

''Maybe we hope to have something by the Spring of 2021, maybe it could take longer but certainly nothing this year.

''We have some evidence against our suspect but it is not strong enough. We have proof that he was involved and that he killed Madeleine but it's not strong enough to charge him.



https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/13086481/madeleine-mccann-heartache-suspect-charged-next-year/


Doesn't sound overly optimistic to me.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2387 on: November 03, 2020, 12:22:31 PM »

Doesn't sound overly optimistic to me.

I wonder how accurate the article is..


We have proof that he was involved and that he killed Madeleine but it's not strong enough to charge him.



I think they may well have proof of death and therefore abduction

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2388 on: November 03, 2020, 12:33:03 PM »
Well seems HCW has spoken to the sun. Tu Tut Tut


MADELEINE McCann's parents face fresh heartache after prosecutors revealed they would not be charging the prime suspect until next year at the earliest.

Convicted rapist and paedophile Christian B, 43, was identified as the man responsible for the three-year old's kidnap and murder by the German authorities in June.

Kate and Gerry hoped it would mark the end of their 13 year agony at not knowing what had happened to their beloved daughter but now their hopes have been dashed.

Speaking exclusively to The Sun, prosecutor Hans Christian Wolters admitted leads had dried up and there would be no developments this year, with charges unlikely before the Spring and only if they find more evidence.

He said: ''I cannot say how long our investigation will go on for but I know there will be no developments this year, in 2020. We had hoped to charge him but that has not been possible.

''Maybe we hope to have something by the Spring of 2021, maybe it could take longer but certainly nothing this year.

''We have some evidence against our suspect but it is not strong enough. We have proof that he was involved and that he killed Madeleine but it's not strong enough to charge him.



https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/13086481/madeleine-mccann-heartache-suspect-charged-next-year/

How can he be certain nothing will happen this year? They could theoretically get a phone call tomorrow.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2389 on: November 03, 2020, 12:34:55 PM »
How can he be certain nothing will happen this year? They could theoretically get a phone call tomorrow.

How can we be certain he recently spoke to the sun..
How can we be certain the Sun have quoted him correctly

You seem to think every word is true...LOL

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2390 on: November 03, 2020, 12:38:23 PM »
Good to see the media is still running scared of this story and trembling in their boots about the impending legal action.  When are we due to fall off our chairs btw?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2391 on: November 03, 2020, 12:43:40 PM »
How can he be certain nothing will happen this year? They could theoretically get a phone call tomorrow.

Good point.

Reminds me of gmcc planning concerts in advance when Maddie could have been found that day.

Offline sadie

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2392 on: November 03, 2020, 12:55:39 PM »
Good point.

Reminds me of gmcc planning concerts in advance when Maddie could have been found that day.

Forward thinking and planning, excellent

Remember Madeleine most probably would not be found so soon, and she was not.

It was necessary to keep the impetus going and produce income for the search.  Remember, nobody was searching for Madeleine except them (and a few followers).   Goncalo Amaral and the PJ had given up.


I do hope that if one of your children was snatched, God forbid, that you would work as diligently as The Mccanns to keep the search going.

I wouldn't like to think your little one was abandoned.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2393 on: November 03, 2020, 12:58:04 PM »
Good point.

Reminds me of gmcc planning concerts in advance when Maddie could have been found that day.
You probably make plans for Christmas when in theory you could be run over by a bus tomorrow. 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2394 on: November 03, 2020, 01:33:24 PM »
You probably make plans for Christmas when in theory you could be run over by a bus tomorrow.

Didn't his brother give up a well-paid job to be on team mcc. Bit exstream when Maddie could have been found anytime soon.

How did they know Maddie was not going to be found anytime soon.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2395 on: November 03, 2020, 01:36:27 PM »
Didn't his brother give up a well-paid job to be on team mcc. Bit exstream when Maddie could have been found anytime soon.

How did they know Maddie was not going to be found anytime soon.
”exstream”?  Is that a dried-up river?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline jassi

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2396 on: November 03, 2020, 01:37:02 PM »
Didn't his brother give up a well-paid job to be on team mcc. Bit exstream when Maddie could have been found anytime soon.

How did they know Maddie was not going to be found anytime soon.


That's what was said, but I think it turned out to be leave of absence, rather than throwing the job over.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2397 on: November 03, 2020, 01:39:03 PM »
”exstream”?  Is that a dried-up river?

No one that's been filled in.

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2398 on: November 03, 2020, 05:41:11 PM »
''We need more evidence and more witnesses but if we don't get them then the case may drop but we hope that will not happen and he will be charged.''

His downbeat comments are in contrast to June where he announced in a headline grabbing news conference he had ''concrete evidence'' Maddie was dead.


So seems HCW job is done. CB forever the scapegoat

Offline jassi

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2399 on: November 03, 2020, 05:43:49 PM »
''We need more evidence and more witnesses but if we don't get them then the case may drop but we hope that will not happen and he will be charged.''

His downbeat comments are in contrast to June where he announced in a headline grabbing news conference he had ''concrete evidence'' Maddie was dead.


So seems HCW job is done. CB forever the scapegoat

Without proper proof, there will always be doubt.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future