Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300560 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2400 on: November 03, 2020, 05:44:03 PM »
''We need more evidence and more witnesses but if we don't get them then the case may drop but we hope that will not happen and he will be charged.''

His downbeat comments are in contrast to June where he announced in a headline grabbing news conference he had ''concrete evidence'' Maddie was dead.


So seems HCW job is done. CB forever the scapegoat

We have proof that he was involved and that he killed Madeleine

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2401 on: November 03, 2020, 05:53:24 PM »
We have proof that he was involved and that he killed Madeleine

So do you think if CB wasn't in prison they would have arrested him and charged him?

Or just left it like they are doing now -  waiting to get more evidence.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2402 on: November 03, 2020, 06:01:06 PM »
So do you think if CB wasn't in prison they would have arrested him and charged him?

Or just left it like they are doing now -  waiting to get more evidence.

I think there could be others involved

Offline jassi

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2403 on: November 03, 2020, 06:01:51 PM »
Any proof the Germans, or indeed anyone else has  needs to be tested in a court of law before it can have any credibility.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2404 on: November 03, 2020, 06:03:20 PM »
Any proof the Germans, or indeed anyone else has  needs to be tested in a court of law before it can have any credibility.
Not really

Offline Anthro

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2405 on: November 03, 2020, 06:17:52 PM »
”exstream”?  Is that a dried-up river?
I think it might mean that your ex is named Stream.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2406 on: November 03, 2020, 06:23:28 PM »
Any proof the Germans, or indeed anyone else has  needs to be tested in a court of law before it can have any credibility.
Does that mean you don’t believe there is a credible case against the McCanns?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline jassi

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2407 on: November 03, 2020, 06:26:56 PM »
Does that mean you don’t believe there is a credible case against the McCanns?

At present no, but there will always be a suspicion.  IMO
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2408 on: November 03, 2020, 06:33:12 PM »
At present no, but there will always be a suspicion.  IMO

Not if the Germans produce proof of murder and abduction..... several reputations will be trashed

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2409 on: November 03, 2020, 06:38:59 PM »
You probably make plans for Christmas when in theory you could be run over by a bus tomorrow.
A few lucky ones do.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2410 on: November 03, 2020, 06:41:40 PM »
I think there could be others involved

So if he wasn't in prison they would have just left him wondering about ...knowing he had killed a child.

Cant, you see how absurd it is if they have proof he killed Maddie. that they haven't charged him.

How can you think that this makes any sense?

''Maybe we hope to have something by the Spring of 2021, maybe it could take longer but certainly nothing this year".


Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2411 on: November 03, 2020, 06:43:18 PM »
So if he wasn't in prison they would have just left him wondering about ...knowing he had killed a child.

Cant, you see how absurd it is if they have proof he killed Maddie. that they haven't charged him.

How can you think that this makes any sense?

''Maybe we hope to have something by the Spring of 2021, maybe it could take longer but certainly nothing this year".
Left him wondering about what?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2412 on: November 03, 2020, 06:45:10 PM »
So if he wasn't in prison they would have just left him wondering about ...knowing he had killed a child.

Cant, you see how absurd it is if they have proof he killed Maddie. that they haven't charged him.

How can you think that this makes any sense?

''Maybe we hope to have something by the Spring of 2021, maybe it could take longer but certainly nothing this year".

I think it's absurd to base your opinIons on what you read in the Sun

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2413 on: November 03, 2020, 06:46:18 PM »
So if he wasn't in prison they would have just left him wondering about ...knowing he had killed a child.

Cant, you see how absurd it is if they have proof he killed Maddie. that they haven't charged him.

How can you think that this makes any sense?

'' Maybe we hope to have something by the Spring of 2021, maybe it could take longer but certainly nothing this year".
There is no second chance when charging someone with murder so waiting till all the evidence is in is the most sensible option IMO.

Left him wondering about what?
"Wondering about" what evidence they do have.   Even I'm doing that.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2414 on: November 03, 2020, 06:50:54 PM »
There is no second chance when charging someone with murder so waiting till all the evidence is in is the most sensible option IMO.
"Wondering about" what evidence they do have.   Even I'm doing that.

Double jeapordy