Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB

[Miss Taken Identity]

Oh dear...you know nothing about me and my life.....but like everything selse you know nothing about...you think you are an expert on it. The forum is descending into  a shadow of its former self...and I actually have much better things to do than post here

em..ok Mr Too busy to respond to every post in every McCANN thread.
Ta ta  catch ya later.

[Mr Gray]

em..ok Mr Too busy to respond to every post in every McCANN thread.
Ta ta  catch ya later.

I dont think you will....I think the standard of your posts are so appallingly poor Ill probably just ignore them in future

[kizzy]

A really good Vidio IMO it looks at both sides of what happened -  as in are the mccs involved in what happened to Maddie or just a lot of strange/cold behaviour

Amazed at the things mentioned that have been brought up over the years as being very very odd.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpJvln-Flco&feature=emb_logo

Haven't seen it all yet as on longer than I expected so don't know their conclusion of what they think happened..

[Vertigo Swirl]

A really good Vidio IMO it looks at both sides of what happened -  as in are the mccs involved in what happened to Maddie or just a lot of strange/cold behaviour

Amazed at the things mentioned that have been brought up over the years as being very very odd.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpJvln-Flco&feature=emb_logo

Haven't seen it all yet as on longer than I expected so don't know their conclusion of what they think happened..

IMO there is a lot more reason to think the mccs are more  involve ...than CB

You'd need a medal to sit through 98 minutes of those two fellas chatting to each other.  Good luck! (PS: SPOILER ALERT they conclude the parents dunnit ob).

[Eleanor]

Let's be careful to avoid Libel, if you please.  John doesn't like it and I don't like having to Delete comments.  So this is not a request.  It is a warning.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Let's be careful to avoid Libel, if you please.  John doesn't like it and I don't like having to Delete comments.  So this is not a request.  It is a warning.

Good to know it's still not permitted to libel individuals on this forum - I was beginning to wonder recently....

[kizzy]

You'd need a medal to sit through 98 minutes of those two fellas chatting to each other.  Good luck! (PS: SPOILER ALERT they conclude the parents dunnit ob).

don't know the concluding part yet only listened to 45 mins,

They seem pretty open-minded to me so far

Behaviour, after all, is circumstantial evidence.

[faithlilly]

Seeing now how CB could in fact be a scapegoat, although now because of the continued media saying he is guilty.  Some could now believe he is... on just hearsay and a phone ping. Nothing to prove he was at 5a.

Nothing to prove he was the alleged abductor.

IMO a lot of things with the mccs don't add up more so the abduction - that there is still no proof of it happening.


At his office near the reconstructed medieval town centre, Mr Wolters said: "We have found nothing in the past three months to make us think we've got the wrong suspect, but the evidence we have now is the same we had when we made our first appeal on 3 June.



Mr Wolters said: "There is no forensic evidence, but it is not necessary to have forensics to charge our suspect. We just need more evidence, but I can't say what it is we are looking for though there are different possibilities. Maybe a witness, a photo or a video."

For me the most interesting aspect of this subject is that those who campaigned vigorously for the parent’s innocence, even when the PJ were claiming that they had evidence of their guilt, are the very same individuals who believe Wolter now when he claims that he has evidence of Brueckner’s guilt.

It’s a funny old world.

[Vertigo Swirl]

For me the most interesting aspect of this subject is that those who campaigned vigorously for the parent’s innocence, even when the PJ were claiming that they had evidence of their guilt, are the very same individuals who believe Wolter now when he claims that he has evidence of Brueckner’s guilt.

It’s a funny old world.

it is a funny old world indeed.  When tne McCanns were made arguidos I assumed at the time that the PJ had some concrete evidence against them.  Turned out they didn’t .  when HCW says he has concrete evidence that Madeleine is dead and that CB is involved I take it at face value and will accept what he says until or unless it it is shown to be false.  I don’t see what is wrong with this approach do you?

[faithlilly]

it is a funny old world indeed.  When tne McCanns were made arguidos I assumed at the time that the PJ had some concrete evidence against them.  Turned out they didn’t .  when HCW says he has concrete evidence that Madeleine is dead and that CB is involved I take it at face value and will accept what he says until or unless it it is shown to be false.  I don’t see what is wrong with this approach do you?

Then that being the case I’m not talking about you.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Then that being the case I’m not talking about you.

Who are you talking about then?  I don’t think you know, you’re just making assumptions in order to pooh-pooh those of us who think Madeleine was abducted.

[kizzy]

it is a funny old world indeed.  When tne McCanns were made arguidos I assumed at the time that the PJ had some concrete evidence against them.  Turned out they didn’t .  when HCW says he has concrete evidence that Madeleine is dead and that CB is involved I take it at face value and will accept what he says until or unless it it is shown to be false.  I don’t see what is wrong with this approach do you?

I assumed at the time that the PJ had some concrete evidence against them. [/b] Turned out they didn’t .

Just shows then IMO your not sure if they are involved or not.

Whereas when I heard that Wolt had concrete evidence against CB - I knew he hadn't ...and still hasn't 8 months on.

[Robittybob1]

Good to know it's still not permitted to libel individuals on this forum - I was beginning to wonder recently....

Do you mean the way CB was being libelled?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Do you mean the way CB was being libelled?

No.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I assumed at the time that the PJ had some concrete evidence against them. [/b] Turned out they didn’t .

Just shows then IMO your not sure if they are involved or not.

Whereas when I heard that Wolt had concrete evidence against CB - I knew he hadn't ...and still hasn't 8 months on.

Strange post.  How does what I wrote suggest I think the McCanns may be involved and how can you know for a fact that HCW is lying?