« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 192 193 [194] 195 196 ... 224   Go Down

Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300469 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2895 on: February 04, 2021, 06:27:49 PM »
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2896 on: February 04, 2021, 06:42:26 PM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on February 04, 2021, 06:27:49 PM
Well, who was being libelled then?
I suggest you ask John.
Logged
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2897 on: February 04, 2021, 07:00:36 PM »
Quote from: Vertigo Swirl on February 04, 2021, 06:42:26 PM
I suggest you ask John.

No use distancing yourself now. You were most insistent someone was being libelled a few days ago....so off you go.
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2898 on: February 04, 2021, 07:13:02 PM »
Quote from: faithlilly on February 04, 2021, 07:00:36 PM
No use distancing yourself now. You were most insistent someone was being libelled a few days ago....so off you go.
Off I go where?  Are you trying to pick a fight? 
Logged
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2899 on: February 04, 2021, 07:20:40 PM »

John was not amused by some of the comments.  So can you two pack it in now, otherwise I shall have to get cross.
Logged

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2900 on: February 04, 2021, 07:25:33 PM »
Quote from: Eleanor on February 04, 2021, 07:20:40 PM
John was not amused by some of the comments.  So can you two pack it in now, otherwise I shall have to get cross.
I have done nothing wrong.
Logged
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2901 on: February 04, 2021, 07:28:37 PM »
Quote from: Vertigo Swirl on February 04, 2021, 07:25:33 PM
I have done nothing wrong.

But it does take two to keep the bickering going.
Logged

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2902 on: February 04, 2021, 07:30:27 PM »
Quote from: Eleanor on February 04, 2021, 07:28:37 PM
But it does take two to keep the bickering going.
Which is why I suggested Rob speak to John about it.  I’m surprised he wasn’t already briefed by John about it tbh.  I’ll shut up now.
Logged
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2903 on: February 04, 2021, 07:30:33 PM »
Quote from: Eleanor on February 04, 2021, 07:28:37 PM
But it does take two to keep the bickering going.

True enough. I’ll consider myself told.
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2904 on: February 04, 2021, 07:35:03 PM »

All Mods were told to put a stop to this.  I don't know if Rob read the message.  I certainly did.
Logged

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2905 on: February 04, 2021, 08:31:00 PM »
Quote from: Eleanor on February 04, 2021, 07:35:03 PM
All Mods were told to put a stop to this.  I don't know if Rob read the message.  I certainly did.
I find those messages so unspecific I don't know what to change.    "No more libel". Well, show us an example of what you are talking about.   
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2906 on: February 04, 2021, 08:34:57 PM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on February 04, 2021, 08:31:00 PM
I find those messages so unspecific I don't know what to change.    "No more libel". Well, show us an example of what you are talking about.
Can you take this to the Mod forum please?  Sort out amongst yourselves what constitutes libel. It really isn’t rocket science.
Logged
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2907 on: February 04, 2021, 08:37:34 PM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on February 04, 2021, 08:31:00 PM
I find those messages so unspecific I don't know what to change.    "No more libel". Well, show us an example of what you are talking about.

The message said, Libel, Potential Libel and Inappropriate Comments.

I am not talking about anything.  John is.  You and me have to use our common sense and apply it to Everyone and not just the ill fated.
Logged

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2908 on: February 05, 2021, 01:48:49 AM »
Quote from: Vertigo Swirl on February 04, 2021, 08:34:57 PM
Can you take this to the Mod forum please?  Sort out amongst yourselves what constitutes libel. It really isn’t rocket science.
Can you sort out your issue with Faithlilly?  I've asked the same question over there.  We all need to know what is libel and what isn't.
Logged
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2909 on: February 05, 2021, 01:52:01 AM »
Quote from: Robittybob1 on February 05, 2021, 01:48:49 AM
Can you sort out your issue with Faithlilly?  I've asked the same question over there.  We all need to know what is libel and what isn't.

No issue here.
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?
Pages: 1 ... 192 193 [194] 195 196 ... 224   Go Up
« previous next »