Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB

[kizzy]

In articles dated October 27 ("Madeleine clues hidden for 5 years" and "Investigators had E-Fits five years ago", News) we referred to efits which were included in a report prepared by private investigators for the McCanns and the Fund in 2008. We accept that the articles may have been understood to suggest that the McCanns had withheld information from the authorities. This was not the case. We now understand and accept that the efits had been provided to the Portuguese and Leicestershire police by October 2009. We also understand that a copy of the final report including the efits was passed to the Metropolitan police in August 2011, shortly after it commenced its review. We apologise for the distress caused."

I would like to read your link if you don't mind L

[kizzy]

In articles dated October 27 ("Madeleine clues hidden for 5 years" and "Investigators had E-Fits five years ago", News) we referred to efits which were included in a report prepared by private investigators for the McCanns and the Fund in 2008. We accept that the articles may have been understood to suggest that the McCanns had withheld information from the authorities. This was not the case. We now understand and accept that the efits had been provided to the Portuguese and Leicestershire police by October 2009. We also understand that a copy of the final report including the efits was passed to the Metropolitan police in August 2011, shortly after it commenced its review. We apologise for the distress caused."

In articles dated October 27 ("Madeleine clues hidden for 5 years

So in October 27th what year not saying anything is underhanded here but. if it was 2009 where had they been as they was classed as crucial evidence .....till 2013.

Not CB it seems.


Madeleine McCann search: E-fit man 'was seen carrying child'
14 October 2013

The witnesses said the man was white, 20 to 40 years old and of medium build. He had short brown hair, was clean-shaven and of medium height, they added.



https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24513267

[Mr Gray]

In articles dated October 27 ("Madeleine clues hidden for 5 years

So in October 27th what year not saying anything is underhanded here but. if it was 2009 where had they been as they was classed as crucial evidence .....till 2013.

Not CB it seems.


Madeleine McCann search: E-fit man 'was seen carrying child'
14 October 2013

The witnesses said the man was white, 20 to 40 years old and of medium build. He had short brown hair, was clean-shaven and of medium height, they added.



https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24513267

CB isn't smithman

[Eleanor]

CB isn't smithman

More likely to be Cristovao, if you want my opinion.

[faithlilly]

More likely to be Cristovao, if you want my opinion.

Hilarious.

[Eleanor]

Hilarious.

Sorry.  Not biting today.

[faithlilly]

Sorry.  Not biting today.

Sorry I thought it was a joke. You don’t truly believe that a serving police officer helped to abduct Madeleine, do you ?

[Eleanor]

Sorry I thought it was a joke. You don’t truly believe that a serving police officer helped to abduct Madeleine, do you ?

I just thought that he looked like him.  If you want my honest opinion.  Which you probably don't.

I find it really hard to take you seriously because you are actually a quite nice person.

But Yes, I do think that a serving PJ Officer could have helped to abduct Madeleine.

Cristovao is a convicted criminal already.

[faithlilly]

I just thought that he looked like him.  If you want my honest opinion.  Which you probably don't.

I find it really hard to take you seriously because you are actually a quite nice person.

But Yes, I do think that a serving PJ Officer could have helped to abduct Madeleine.

Cristovao is a convicted criminal already.

And on a scale of one to ten, ten being the highest, how likely do you think it is that Cristovao, or any other police officer, abducted Madeleine ? Of course they’d have to been in cahoots with Brueckner if Wolter is to be believed, so yet another layer of unlikely right there.

[Eleanor]

And on a scale of one to ten, ten being the highest, how likely do you think it is that Cristovao, or any other police officer, abducted Madeleine ? Of course they’d have to been in cahoots with Brueckner if Wolter is to be believed, so yet another layer of unlikely right there.

Are you interested in discussing this academically?  Or are you just trying to wind me up into saying something that you think that you can later denounce?

If you want to play my game then you are going to have to be very good at it.  A teensy bit better than you are at the moment, although I am sure that you can be if you understand what I am talking about.

[sadie]

And on a scale of one to ten, ten being the highest, how likely do you think it is that Cristovao, or any other police officer, abducted Madeleine ? Of course they’d have to been in cahoots with Brueckner if Wolter is to be believed, so yet another layer of unlikely right there.

I agree with Elli, Cristovao is very like the one image of Smithman, but not like the other.   

It could easily be a senior Police Officer involved, because so many of them are criminals and some of the ones we know are linked to each other by blood ties, or birthplace district ties

[Lace]

I would like to read your link if you don't mind L

https://www.pressgazette.co.uk/sunday-times-sued-mccanns-over-story-which-wrongly-claimed-evidence-was-withheld-police/

[faithlilly]

Are you interested in discussing this academically?  Or are you just trying to wind me up into saying something that you think that you can later denounce?

If you want to play my game then you are going to have to be very good at it.  A teensy bit better than you are at the moment, although I am sure that you can be if you understand what I am talking about.

No game just a straightforward question.

[kizzy]

https://www.pressgazette.co.uk/sunday-times-sued-mccanns-over-story-which-wrongly-claimed-evidence-was-withheld-police/

 

Why is it always there reputation that is first and foremost?

They said that the story led to them having “suffered serious damage to their reputations and severe embarrassment and distress”.

[sadie]

Why is it always there reputation that is first and foremost?

They said that the story led to them having “suffered serious damage to their reputations and severe embarrassment and distress”.

OH KIZZY! 

Please be realistic!   The harm done to them their children and all the family is immense.   They are to be admired for having shouldered it all without suing some of you.   

I wonder if that will come when the case is wound up ?