Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300104 times)

0 Members and 20 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Lace

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #855 on: October 01, 2020, 06:25:00 PM »
Both posts IMO ....only your version of things...OR IYO.

You don't know why kmc didn't answer those questions.

Or if her book was any different to GAs.

They I believe had the nerve to say it stopped people looking for maddie. GA book. and some on here.

Yet they have no problem with HCW saying Maddie is dead, so who do they think is looking for her now.


If people thought Madeleine was dead of course they wouldn't keep an eye out for her.

It's obvious why Kate didn't answer the questions they were trying to fit her up for Madeleine's disappearance.

How do you know they have no problem with HCW saying Madeleine is dead?   OG is still treating it as a missing persons investigation.

Of course Kate's book was different to Amaral's what Kate told was her account of what happened to her and Gerry,  Amaral's was an account of what he thought happened and none of it was proven.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #856 on: October 01, 2020, 06:36:23 PM »
Both posts IMO ....only your version of things...OR IYO.

You don't know why kmc didn't answer those questions.

Or if her book was any different to GAs.

They I believe had the nerve to say it stopped people looking for maddie. GA book. and some on here.

Yet they have no problem with HCW saying Maddie is dead, so who do they think is looking for her now.
Can we have a cite for the McCanns having no problem with HCW saying Maddie is dead?  No, didn’t think so.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #857 on: October 01, 2020, 10:51:10 PM »
It's in Kate's book Rob.   When the Police were interrogating her they suggested she could have had a black out and couldn't remember what she did.
Why would Kate mention what the PJ claim?  If someone did blackout what responsibility do they have.  In NZ a blackout would be like having a heart attack, like classed as a medical emergency.  Minutes later she seems in full control alerting the others.  I still don't remember Kate making that claim. 
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #858 on: October 01, 2020, 10:53:15 PM »
Actually it was the cat.  I hope you are not offended that she laughed herself silly as a result :)
My cat also walks over the keyboard. 
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #859 on: October 01, 2020, 11:11:10 PM »
My cat also walks over the keyboard.

They don't like to be left out of anything.  The wee horrors have got to be the centre of attention
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #860 on: October 02, 2020, 10:54:20 AM »

If people thought Madeleine was dead of course they wouldn't keep an eye out for her.

It's obvious why Kate didn't answer the questions they were trying to fit her up for Madeleine's disappearance.

How do you know they have no problem with HCW saying Madeleine is dead?   OG is still treating it as a missing persons investigation.

Of course Kate's book was different to Amaral's what Kate told was her account of what happened to her and Gerry,  Amaral's was an account of what he thought happened and none of it was proven.


If people thought Madeleine was dead of course they wouldn't keep an eye out for her.


That was one of  my points.

So its wrong for GA to say ...[Maddie is dead.]

Yet ok when HCW says ...... [Maddie is dead.]

Double standards or what. L


Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #861 on: October 02, 2020, 10:57:51 AM »
Can we have a cite for the McCanns having no problem with HCW saying Maddie is dead?  No, didn’t think so.

Why would I need  a cite for.


 They I believe had the nerve to say it stopped people looking for maddie. GA book. and some on here.

Yet they have no problem with HCW saying Maddie is dead, so who do they think is looking for her now
.

No, I didn't think so.




Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #862 on: October 02, 2020, 12:07:49 PM »
Why would I need  a cite for.


 They I believe had the nerve to say it stopped people looking for maddie. GA book. and some on here.

Yet they have no problem with HCW saying Maddie is dead, so who do they think is looking for her now
.

No, I didn't think so.

It seems quite clear that the opinion you expressed in your post is exactly that. Opinion ... and only yours which is entirely nothing at all to do with Kate McCann.

You have attributed a sentiment to her which she has NEVER expressed; please have more care about that sort of thing in future posts.


Kate & Gerry McCann Statement: June 16th, 2020
Since the recent police appeals regarding Madeleine’s disappearance there have been many inaccurate stories reported in the media.  The widely reported news that we have a received a letter from the German authorities that states there is evidence or proof that Madeleine is dead is FALSE.  Like many unsubstantiated stories in the media, this has caused unnecessary anxiety to friends and family and once again disrupted our lives.

As we have stated many times before, we will not give a running commentary on the investigation- that is the job of the law enforcement agencies and we will support them in any way requested.  Furthermore, we do not have a family spokesperson nor are we actively paying any lawyers.  Any recent comments attributed in the media have not come from us unless they have been posted on our website.  If there are important developments that can be made public, they will be issued through official police channels.

Kate and Gerry

http://findmadeleine.com/updates/index.html
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #863 on: October 02, 2020, 12:24:48 PM »
It seems quite clear that the opinion you expressed in your post is exactly that. Opinion ... and only yours which is entirely nothing at all to do with Kate McCann.

You have attributed a sentiment to her which she has NEVER expressed; please have more care about that sort of thing in future posts.


Kate & Gerry McCann Statement: June 16th, 2020
Since the recent police appeals regarding Madeleine’s disappearance there have been many inaccurate stories reported in the media.  The widely reported news that we have a received a letter from the German authorities that states there is evidence or proof that Madeleine is dead is FALSE.  Like many unsubstantiated stories in the media, this has caused unnecessary anxiety to friends and family and once again disrupted our lives.

As we have stated many times before, we will not give a running commentary on the investigation- that is the job of the law enforcement agencies and we will support them in any way requested.  Furthermore, we do not have a family spokesperson nor are we actively paying any lawyers.  Any recent comments attributed in the media have not come from us unless they have been posted on our website.  If there are important developments that can be made public, they will be issued through official police channels.

Kate and Gerry

http://findmadeleine.com/updates/index.html

I think you are wrong and having the nerve to challenge my post with your opinion of me..

1...The mccs was at a libel trial in what I believe one of the reasons was GA saying maddie was dead .

2 a quote from one on here L "If people thought Madeleine was dead of course they wouldn't keep an eye out for her".

my point again was ..is it ok for CWH to say Maddie is dead -  but not GA to say M addie is dead.



6
Gerry McCann lashed out at Portuguese police today, as a former senior detective dismissed the McCanns' challenge to claims that Madeleine was dead as "pathetic".

In a heated exchange with reporters outside the court in Lisbon, Gerry McCann insisted there was "absolutely no evidence" to support the claim that his daughter was dead, before the court heard more challenges to the McCanns' account of events.

As Madeleine's parents returned for a second day of the libel trial over claims about their daughter's disappearance, Gerry McCann appeared rattled as he argued with Portuguese journalists about the claims of officials involved in the investigation. "There is absolutely no evidence that Madeleine is dead and there is absolutely no evidence that we were involved in her disappearance," he said.

Advertisement
This morning the court heard fresh evidence questioning the disappearance of Madeleine. Former senior police officer and criminologist Francisco Moita Flores told the hearing that the McCanns' legal challenge to permanently ban a book by Gonçalo Amaral, the officer who initially led the Madeleine inquiry for Portugal's CID, the polícia judiciária (PJ), was "pathetic".


https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2010/jan/13/gerry-mccann-no-evidence-madeleine-dead

Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #864 on: October 02, 2020, 12:52:51 PM »
I think you are wrong and having the nerve to challenge my post with your opinion of me..

1...The mccs was at a libel trial in what I believe one of the reasons was GA saying maddie was dead .

2 a quote from one on here L "If people thought Madeleine was dead of course they wouldn't keep an eye out for her".

my point again was ..is it ok for CWH to say Maddie is dead -  but not GA to say M addie is dead.



6
Gerry McCann lashed out at Portuguese police today, as a former senior detective dismissed the McCanns' challenge to claims that Madeleine was dead as "pathetic".

In a heated exchange with reporters outside the court in Lisbon, Gerry McCann insisted there was "absolutely no evidence" to support the claim that his daughter was dead, before the court heard more challenges to the McCanns' account of events.

As Madeleine's parents returned for a second day of the libel trial over claims about their daughter's disappearance, Gerry McCann appeared rattled as he argued with Portuguese journalists about the claims of officials involved in the investigation. "There is absolutely no evidence that Madeleine is dead and there is absolutely no evidence that we were involved in her disappearance," he said.

Advertisement
This morning the court heard fresh evidence questioning the disappearance of Madeleine. Former senior police officer and criminologist Francisco Moita Flores told the hearing that the McCanns' legal challenge to permanently ban a book by Gonçalo Amaral, the officer who initially led the Madeleine inquiry for Portugal's CID, the polícia judiciária (PJ), was "pathetic".


https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2010/jan/13/gerry-mccann-no-evidence-madeleine-dead

You are losing me just a little here as your posts become more and more mired in past events which mean nothing to the topic of this thread or every other thread which rapidly degenerates into a general blackguarding of innocent people.

Just a reminder of who the prime suspect in Madeleine's abduction is ... the rapist and paedophile whose name appears in the thread title.

In my opinion a mention of him now and again might go some way to restoring a balance to what seems to be a McCann hatefest.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #865 on: October 02, 2020, 01:06:05 PM »
You are losing me just a little here as your posts become more and more mired in past events which mean nothing to the topic of this thread or every other thread which rapidly degenerates into a general blackguarding of innocent people.

Just a reminder of who the prime suspect in Madeleine's abduction is ... the rapist and paedophile whose name appears in the thread title.

In my opinion a mention of him now and again might go some way to restoring a balance to what seems to be a McCann hatefest.

the rapist and paedophile whose name appears in the thread title.

Yes well so are the mccs

Yes well the hatefest is your words not mine.

I just believe the are responsible for Maddie not being here today. nothing to do with a hatefest as u put it.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #866 on: October 02, 2020, 01:23:08 PM »
Why would I need  a cite for.


 They I believe had the nerve to say it stopped people looking for maddie. GA book. and some on here.

Yet they have no problem with HCW saying Maddie is dead, so who do they think is looking for her now
.

No, I didn't think so.
You made a claim "The McCanhs have no problem with HCW saying Maddie is dead" - it wasn't your opinion, you wrote it as a factual statement hence you need a cite or withdraw the claim.  Them's the rules, ask G-Unit!
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #867 on: October 02, 2020, 01:26:43 PM »
the rapist and paedophile whose name appears in the thread title.

Yes well so are the mccs

Yes well the hatefest is your words not mine.

I just believe the are responsible for Maddie not being here today. nothing to do with a hatefest as u put it.

Brueckner ???  ???  ???
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline sadie

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #868 on: October 02, 2020, 01:27:41 PM »
the rapist and paedophile whose name appears in the thread title.

Yes well so are the mccs

Yes well the hatefest is your words not mine.

I just believe the are responsible for Maddie not being here today. nothing to do with a hatefest as u put it.

I am sorry kizzy, but Brietta is right, your posts do come over as a hatefest   

One after another the posts keep coming, with a refusal to accept anything that The Mccanns and their supporters say.   Refusal to accept that both the leads in the Policein the UK and Germany have said that the Mccanns were not involved … and excluding Amaral and few of his buddies, senior members of the PJ have also indicated that they do not think The Mccanns involved either.

…. and just look at your signature; that indicates your hate, doesn't it ?

IMO, it is time that you looked at the reality of the situation and backed off.   I wouldn't like you to get into big trouble, because apart from your stance on The Mccanns, I see a lot of nice in you


Take care.   

Sadie (the odd one (&^& )

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #869 on: October 02, 2020, 02:02:30 PM »
I am sorry kizzy, but Brietta is right, your posts do come over as a hatefest   

One after another the posts keep coming, with a refusal to accept anything that The Mccanns and their supporters say.   Refusal to accept that both the leads in the Police/ Judicary in the UK and Germany have said that the Mccanns were not involved … and excluding Amaral and few of his buddies, senior members of the PJ have also indicated that they do not think The Mccanns involved either.

…. and just look at your signature; that indicates your hate, doesn't it ?

IMO, it is time that you looked at the reality of the situation and backed off.   I wouldn't like you to get into big trouble, because apart from your stance on The Mccanns, I see a lot of nice in you


Take care.   

Sadie (the odd one (&^& )

Ah, but is there more circumstantial  evidence against the mccanns than there is CB?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0