Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB

[kizzy]

I am sorry kizzy, but Brietta is right, your posts do come over as a hatefest   

One after another the posts keep coming, with a refusal to accept anything that The Mccanns and their supporters say.   Refusal to accept that both the leads in the Police/ Judicary in the UK and Germany have said that the Mccanns were not involved … and excluding Amaral and few of his buddies, senior members of the PJ have also indicated that they do not think The Mccanns involved either.

…. and just look at your signature; that indicates your hate, doesn't it ?

IMO, it is time that you looked at the reality of the situation and backed off.   I wouldn't like you to get into big trouble, because apart from your stance on The Mccanns, I see a lot of nice in you


Take care.   

Sadie (the odd one )

I am nice sadie and I have principles and stand by what I believe to be true, just the same as you really but different beliefs.

It is my prerogative to believe what "I" want to believe, not what I am told I should believe.

Why should I accept what I don't believe to be true.

Also judged as a person for what I post on a forum for what I believed happened.

You can agree with B as much as you like, but I dont.

I have took the same stance since nearly the beginning tat I do not believe in the abduction or the mccs.

If it does upset you what I post or others, please feel free to put me on block not treat me as some sort of threat.

take care and keep safe Sadie. x

[kizzy]

You made a claim "The McCanhs have no problem with HCW saying Maddie is dead" - it wasn't your opinion, you wrote it as a factual statement hence you need a cite or withdraw the claim.  Them's the rules, ask G-Unit!

The McCanhs have no problem with HCW saying Maddie is dead

What are you talking about ...you show me where I said that.

Bit childish as well it seems to bring G-Unit into it.Vs

[Vertigo Swirl]

The McCanhs have no problem with HCW saying Maddie is dead

What are you talking about ...you show me where I said that.

Bit childish as well it seems to bring G-Unit into it.Vs

I have re-read your original post and concede  that because it was undoubtedly badly worded that you probably meant that it was McCann SUPPORTERS that have no problem with HCW saying "Maddie" is dead - if that was your meaning then I withdraw my request and apologise for my misunderstanding.  For the record I take no pleasure in accepting that Madeleine is almost certainly dead.  If HCW has strong evidence that she is, then I accept that and assume he has good grounds for saying so.  Yours humbly, and with love and contrition.

[sadie]

Ah, but is there more circumstantial  evidence against the mccanns than there is CB?

No

[G-Unit]

No

I have seen no evidence linking CB to the crime scene or the crime, circumstantial or otherwise.

[kizzy]

I have re-read your original post and concede  that because it was undoubtedly badly worded that you probably meant that it was McCann SUPPORTERS that have no problem with HCW saying "Maddie" is dead - if that was your meaning then I withdraw my request and apologise for my misunderstanding.  For the record I take no pleasure in accepting that Madeleine is almost certainly dead.  If HCW has strong evidence that she is, then I accept that and assume he has good grounds for saying so.  Yours humbly, and with love and contrition.

Thank you.it was... [think its my northern accent]

I don't like to think of Maddie as dead but imo she has been since may 2007.

[kizzy]

No

The window, in my opinion, could be the key to all this as in if it was not open everything after that is false.imo

Why would she look out of it and yet not close it when it was blowing the curtains about.

If she looked out of the window why did she not look out of the front door nearest to Maddies bed.

That front door led to a car park locked, but could be opened from the inside.

This is an important point to me especially the window as the only way to back up abduction imo

The open door could have meant just woke and wandered. ten minutes she searched and did not close that window.

I also believe the bedroom door would have slamed shut when kmc opened the patio door if the window had been open.

Not that it wasnt in the same position ...how would she know it was the check after gmcc that he handt moved it .

[G-Unit]

The window, in my opinion, could be the key to all this as in if it was not open everything after that is false.imo

Why would she look out of it and yet not close it when it was blowing the curtains about.

If she looked out of the window why did she not look out of the front door nearest to Maddies bed.

That front door led to a car park locked, but could be opened from the inside.

This is an important point to me especially the window as the only way to back up abduction imo

The open door could have meant just woke and wandered. ten minutes she searched and did not close that window.

I also believe the bedroom door would have slamed shut when kmc opened the patio door if the window had been open.

Not that it wasnt in the same position ...how would she know it was the check after gmcc that he handt moved it .

Madeleine was missing and the priority in my opinion was to find her. They had no idea how long ago she went. It could have been very recently. Therefore searching the immediate vicinity and then working outwards was vital as she could be close.

The open shutters and window could have been opened from outside or inside, as the patio doors were unlocked. So why, instead of scouring the resort, was her father wasting time testing if the shutters could be opened from outside? It didn't matter! What mattered was getting loads of people out there searching for his daughter.

[Anthro]

Madeleine was missing and the priority in my opinion was to find her. They had no idea how long ago she went. It could have been very recently. Therefore searching the immediate vicinity and then working outwards was vital as she could be close.

The open shutters and window could have been opened from outside or inside, as the patio doors were unlocked. So why, instead of scouring the resort, was her father wasting time testing if the shutters could be opened from outside? It didn't matter! What mattered was getting loads of people out there searching for his daughter.

And, according to statements many people did indeed search for Madeleine.

[Anthro]

Madeleine was missing and the priority in my opinion was to find her. They had no idea how long ago she went. It could have been very recently. Therefore searching the immediate vicinity and then working outwards was vital as she could be close.

The open shutters and window could have been opened from outside or inside, as the patio doors were unlocked. So why, instead of scouring the resort, was her father wasting time testing if the shutters could be opened from outside? It didn't matter! What mattered was getting loads of people out there searching for his daughter.

Do we know if this hasn’t in fact been done?

[Anthro]

Ah, but is there more circumstantial  evidence against the mccanns than there is CB?

The public simply do not know the extent of evidence that German authorities have on Brückner, albeit circumstantial and/or tangible. My opinion. This surely is different to so-called evidence against Madeleine’s parents, as contained in the PJ files?

[Holly Goodhead]

The public simply do not know the extent of evidence that German authorities have on Brückner, albeit circumstantial and/or tangible. My opinion. This surely is different to so-called evidence against Madeleine’s parents, as contained in the PJ files?

Mc's were made arguidoes by Portuguese authorities.  CB made scapegoat by tabloids. 

[Robittybob1]

Mc's were made arguidoes by Portuguese authorities.  CB made scapegoat by tabloids.

Welcome to the forum.

[barrier]

Mc's were made arguidoes by Portuguese authorities.  CB made scapegoat by tabloids.

Welcome back.

[Holly Goodhead]

  Robittybob1 and barrier