Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB

[sadie]

If, on the other hand, Brueckner abducted Madeleine for someone else, then he only has to say so and for whom.  In which case he would then avoid a verdict of murder which is by far the most serious charge.

Trouble is that if the someone else is a drug baron or slave (etc) trafficking boss, then Brueckner will know that if he twigs on them, he will almost certainly be tortured or killed.  Maybe both.

Perhaps Brueckner would prefer Jail to having his testicles cut off and his legs broken before being assassinated?


Just a suggestion

[Angelo222]

Then you must believe Bruckener has something to hide...and Kate McCann as well!   How does thst work?

Brueckner is anti police for obvious reasons but why was Kate McCann?  The old "right to silence" excuse doesn't hold water with innocent people. We know that the guilty use it at every opportunity.

[Angelo222]

Have I condemned Kate McCann for availing herself of the right to silence?

I have no qualms in stating I do. Her attitude to the police was appalling imo.

[Angelo222]

Trouble is that if the someone else is a drug baron or slave (etc) trafficking boss, then Brueckner will know that if he twigs on them, he will almost certainly be tortured or killed.  Maybe both.

Perhaps Brueckner would prefer Jail to having his testicles cut off and his legs broken before being assassinated?


Just a suggestion

I think you've been watching too many horror movies Sadie 😂

[Eleanor]

I wonder why his first Lawyer dropped him?

Will we ever be told?

[Angelo222]

I wonder why his first Lawyer dropped him?

Will we ever be told?

Same reason Jeremy Bambers did.

[Eleanor]

Same reason Jeremy Bambers did.

Why was that?

[Mr Gray]

Brueckner is anti police for obvious reasons but why was Kate McCann?  The old "right to silence" excuse doesn't hold water with innocent people. We know that the guilty use it at every opportunity.

more opinion as fact do you still not undersand the rules.
weve  been over this many times...might be  a good idea to use the search facility if you want the answer

[Vertigo Swirl]

Brueckner is anti police for obvious reasons but why was Kate McCann?  The old "right to silence" excuse doesn't hold water with innocent people. We know that the guilty use it at every opportunity.

Then you must believe Bruckener has something to hide...and Kate McCann as well!   How does that work?  This time actually address the question.

[Mr Gray]

I have no qualms in stating I do. Her attitude to the police was appalling imo.

I think the police conduct was appalling...I think their investiagtion was pathetic...then we have amaral convicted for lying and almeida convicted for torture...quite laughable how anyone can defend them imo

[Brietta]

Brueckner is anti police for obvious reasons but why was Kate McCann?

Brueckner is a career criminal, a rapist and a paedophile.  In my opinion he is being investigated by a very efficient group of investigators.
I don't really think his name is fit to be mentioned in the same breath as Kate McCann's under any circumstances.

Kate is a victim of crime and the mother of a missing child who came to the realisation that her missing daughter was not being looked for because the police were intent on investigating her and pinning Madeleine's disappearance on her.
Which would have had the result of officially closing down any hope Madeleine had of rescue. madeleine  Kate McCann
The police had formed their opinion on inept misinterpretation of the only 'evidence' they had which was the dog evidence.

Kate McCann cooperated with the police and continues to do so in their efforts to find out what happened to the daughter she still hopes has managed to survive through all this.
In my opinion only an idiot would have cooperated with police who had fallen hook line and sinker for entirely the wrong thesis.

I would still like to know why Amaral's assertion came about that Brueckner was cleared by the same police who were grilling Kate McCann.

[sadie]

I think you've been watching too many horror movies Sadie 😂

It's rather worse than I said Angelo.

Like to rescind your post?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-highlands-islands-18826528

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1326281/Tortured-Briton-James-Ross-mend-13-day-ordeal-Portugal.html

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1322187/British-man-tortured-Portugal-unpaid-drug-debt.html

[sadie]

Brueckner is a career criminal, a rapist and a paedophile.  In my opinion he is being investigated by a very efficient group of investigators.
I don't really think his name is fit to be mentioned in the same breath as Kate McCann's under any circumstances.

Kate is a victim of crime and the mother of a missing child who came to the realisation that her missing daughter was not being looked for because the police were intent on investigating her and pinning Madeleine's disappearance on her.
Which would have had the result of officially closing down any hope Madeleine had of rescue. madeleine  Kate McCann
The police had formed their opinion on inept misinterpretation of the only 'evidence' they had which was the dog evidence.

Kate McCann cooperated with the police and continues to do so in their efforts to find out what happened to the daughter she still hopes has managed to survive through all this.
In my opinion only an idiot would have cooperated with police who had fallen hook line and sinker for entirely the wrong thesis.

I would still like to know why Amaral's assertion came about that Brueckner was cleared by the same police who were grilling Kate McCann.

Additionally Kate would have been warned by the British Consul about what happened to Leonor Cipriano and Michael Cook.   How they were tortured and had their interactions with the PJ (Amaral and others) thoroughly abused to change and ignore facts.

Kate was very wisely advised not to answer entrapment questions.

[Anthro]

Brueckner is a career criminal, a rapist and a paedophile.  In my opinion he is being investigated by a very efficient group of investigators.
I don't really think his name is fit to be mentioned in the same breath as Kate McCann's under any circumstances.

Kate is a victim of crime and the mother of a missing child who came to the realisation that her missing daughter was not being looked for because the police were intent on investigating her and pinning Madeleine's disappearance on her.
Which would have had the result of officially closing down any hope Madeleine had of rescue. madeleine  Kate McCann
The police had formed their opinion on inept misinterpretation of the only 'evidence' they had which was the dog evidence.

Kate McCann cooperated with the police and continues to do so in their efforts to find out what happened to the daughter she still hopes has managed to survive through all this.
In my opinion only an idiot would have cooperated with police who had fallen hook line and sinker for entirely the wrong thesis.

I would still like to know why Amaral's assertion came about that Brueckner was cleared by the same police who were grilling Kate McCann.

Also this: “a senior Portuguese police source called the German evidence against "Christian B" both "very important" and "significant."
https://www.ibtimes.com/madeleine-mccann-update-significant-evidence-against-christian-bruckner-discussed-2994134

[barrier]

Additionally Kate would have been warned by the British Consul about what happened to Leonor Cipriano and Michael Cook.   How they were tortured and had their interactions with the PJ (Amaral and others) thoroughly abused to change and ignore facts.

Kate was very wisely advised not to answer entrapment questions.

No reason therefore CB's lawyer would not advise the same,if ever he is questioned.