Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300418 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1155 on: October 06, 2020, 10:49:47 AM »

Can you explain why the German Police believe CB is their man?

No, Can you or are you at a loss also.

A part from a ping in the area were he lived and hearsay

Offline Lace

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1156 on: October 06, 2020, 01:33:08 PM »
No, Can you or are you at a loss also.

A part from a ping in the area were he lived and hearsay

There is much more than the ping.   First of all many people rang in with his name when the appeal went out during the programme Crime Watch.    Then they got the very good friend telling them what he had said.   Then the ping.  Then the remark to the girlfriend of the horrible job he had to do,  surprisingly the eve before Madeleine disappeared.  Then he registers his car to someone else leaves Portugal,  then turns out with a massive campervan that must have cost thousands.   Plus he lived near to the Ocean Club and he is a child molester.

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1157 on: October 06, 2020, 01:46:58 PM »
There is much more than the ping.   First of all many people rang in with his name when the appeal went out during the programme Crime Watch.    Then they got the very good friend telling them what he had said.   Then the ping.  Then the remark to the girlfriend of the horrible job he had to do,  surprisingly the eve before Madeleine disappeared.  Then he registers his car to someone else leaves Portugal,  then turns out with a massive campervan that must have cost thousands.   Plus he lived near to the Ocean Club and he is a child molester.

I know all that ...I read the same papers too.

Its evidence I am talking about.

The crime watch the mccs did receive hundreds of calls ...but that all fizzled out as well...

Offline The General

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1158 on: October 06, 2020, 02:15:34 PM »
There is much more than the ping.   First of all many people rang in with his name when the appeal went out during the programme Crime Watch.    Then they got the very good friend telling them what he had said.   Then the ping.  Then the remark to the girlfriend of the horrible job he had to do,  surprisingly the eve before Madeleine disappeared.  Then he registers his car to someone else leaves Portugal,  then turns out with a massive campervan that must have cost thousands.   Plus he lived near to the Ocean Club and he is a child molester.
1. Unverified, bunk science
2. Cite for the 'many people'.
3. Hearsay - 2nd hand, tainted witness.
4. Unverified, bunk science.
5. Hearsay - 2nd hand, tainted witness.
6. Normal, but could be a flag.
7. Did he sell Maddie after he killed her now?
8. He lived a lot of places, one was the town.
9. Agreed, the filthy piece of ****
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Lace

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1159 on: October 06, 2020, 02:45:14 PM »
1. Unverified, bunk science
2. Cite for the 'many people'.
3. Hearsay - 2nd hand, tainted witness.
4. Unverified, bunk science.
5. Hearsay - 2nd hand, tainted witness.
6. Normal, but could be a flag.
7. Did he sell Maddie after he killed her now?
8. He lived a lot of places, one was the town.
9. Agreed, the filthy piece of ****

It would be the trained Police putting two and two together of course.   They seem to think they have their man..

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1160 on: October 06, 2020, 02:54:35 PM »
It would be the trained Police putting two and two together of course.   They seem to think they have their man..


It would be the trained Police

But seems they are deathly quiet.


Suppose better than opinion and newspaper reports and putting two and two and coming up with five.

Offline The General

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1161 on: October 06, 2020, 02:54:53 PM »
It would be the trained Police putting two and two together of course.   They seem to think they have their man..
Are you putting much store in this supposed purchase of the Winnebago then? Did he sell Maddie or kill her, which is it? It can't be both.
If it's the former, then it sort of blows this theory apart.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Lace

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1162 on: October 06, 2020, 03:02:38 PM »
I know all that ...I read the same papers too.

Its evidence I am talking about.

The crime watch the mccs did receive hundreds of calls ...but that all fizzled out as well...

It wasn't the McCann's who received the calls it was the Police.   Fizzled out how do you know that?   They had a name that was repeated many times so the calls were helpful.

Offline Lace

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1163 on: October 06, 2020, 03:03:19 PM »
Are you putting much store in this supposed purchase of the Winnebago then? Did he sell Maddie or kill her, which is it? It can't be both.
If it's the former, then it sort of blows this theory apart.

He could have taken Madeleine to sell it is possible.

Offline Lace

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1164 on: October 06, 2020, 03:04:10 PM »

It would be the trained Police

But seems they are deathly quiet.


Suppose better than opinion and newspaper reports and putting two and two and coming up with five.

What happened to the 'Justice works in silence' ?

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1165 on: October 06, 2020, 04:06:15 PM »
You may see no evidence against Brueckner but that is not as the professional investigators have seen it.  I think it has been a long hard haul for them and I certainly think that there is bound to be far more evidence against him than ever was against Kate and Gerry since the prejudices of Amaral's investigation just did not translate to any evidence at all against them.

Snip

Suspect was known from investigation

Metropolitan Police Deputy Deputy Commissioner Stuart Cundy said on Wednesday that the suspect became of interest to investigators following a public appeal in 2017, as part of the 10th anniversary of the disappearance. “This man's name was known from our investigation. I will not give details about how it was known, but it was already known before we received new information in 2017. Since then, we have continued to work very closely with colleagues in Portugal and Germany ”, he said.

This man is the current line of investigation by the British police, which came to identify 600 "people of interest" and four other suspects, who were discarded after being interrogated and searches carried out on land in Portugal.

“We have good relations with colleagues in both countries. And I know that we are all determined to find out what happened and see if this man was involved in Madeleine's disappearance or not, ”he said.

https://www.publico.pt/2020/06/03/sociedade/noticia/homem-preso-alemanha-novo-suspeito-caso-madeleine-mccann-1919329

Professional investigators ie MET invested a lot of resources pursing the entirely innocent Colin Stagg over the murder of Rachel Nickell and we all know how that ended!

I'm not sure why you are so critical of GA/PJ when MET have appalling track record?

DCI Mark Cranwell is on record as saying MET have an open mind about CB's involvement.
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline sadie

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1166 on: October 06, 2020, 04:09:53 PM »
He could have taken Madeleine to sell it is possible.

I actually think that Madeleine was ordered …. she had very special things about her and was ordered imo.

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1167 on: October 06, 2020, 04:25:24 PM »
I actually think that Madeleine was ordered …. she had very special things about her and was ordered imo.

Such as? 
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1168 on: October 06, 2020, 05:02:05 PM »
It wasn't the McCann's who received the calls it was the Police.   Fizzled out how do you know that?   They had a name that was repeated many times so the calls were helpful.

Who said it was the mccs who received the calls...I didn't you have assumed again I did.

How do I know it fizzled out ...imo nothing came of it.

The name they had repeated many times was when they finally showed the two photo phits ...

Shown on here wonder what name they were given

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/madeleine-mccann-crimewatch-reconstruction-e-fits-2368473

Offline Lace

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1169 on: October 06, 2020, 05:11:37 PM »
Who said it was the mccs who received the calls...I didn't you have assumed again I did.

How do I know it fizzled out ...imo nothing came of it.

The name they had repeated many times was when they finally showed the two photo phits ...

Shown on here wonder what name they were given

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/madeleine-mccann-crimewatch-reconstruction-e-fits-2368473

It was Crime Watch the McCann's weren't manning the phones.

They give CB's name.

Obviously something did come of it as they had CB as a possible suspect,  so it didn't fizzle out.