Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB

[The General]

No it isn't...most sceptics believe the McCanns guilty and CB innocent

Prove this extraordinary statement and I'll give you a hat fashioned from Lego, a petrified dog egg and a signed paperback copy of The Pelican Brief.
Conduct a straw poll in the streets of Dudley.

[Eleanor]

I don't think it is as straight forward as that.

If you dont believe as the mccs say that Maddie was abducted from her bed.

How can I think that CB abducted Maddie ...regardless of what he is - although I do agree on your description of him.

That doesn't make him an abducter.

I do believe that Madeleine was abducted from her bed.  I don't know if Brueckner was involved, unlike you who is convinced that The McCanns are responsible when you and no one else has been able to prove this in thirteen years.

This is why your thinking is flawed.

[kizzy]

My view is that he may well be guilty...I can't say for certain...as Amaral did re the McCanns

.as Amaral did re the McCanns

Also seems he still does believe mcs are involved in what happened to Maddie

[Eleanor]

Think what you like of CB until due process of law as been undertaken, what is your view on his innocence in the McCann case.

I don't think anything about Brueckner's Guilt or Innocence in The McCann Case.  I thought I had made that quite clear.  I simply don't know.  But I do know that he is a Convicted Rapist and Paedophile.

[kizzy]

I do believe that Madeleine was abducted from her bed.  I don't know if Brueckner was involved, unlike you who is convinced that The McCanns are responsible when you and no one else has been able to prove this in thirteen years.

This is why your thinking is flawed.

This is why your thinking is flawed.

Only in your opinion.

Not in mine, you believe the mccs ....I dont believe the mccs. its just boils down to a difference of opinion that's all.

[Mr Gray]

.as Amaral did re the McCanns

Also seems he still does believe mcs are involved in what happened to Maddie

Because the still doesn't understand the basics...he still thinks calpol is a sedative for instance

[Eleanor]

.as Amaral did re the McCanns

Also seems he still does believe mcs are involved in what happened to Maddie

Amaral is a busted flush trying to remain relevant, while earning a few bob on dubious chat shows.

He is a Convicted Liar and was Sacked from The Investigation thirteen years ago.

[jassi]

Amaral is a busted flush trying to remain relevant, while earning a few bob on dubious chat shows.

He is a Convicted Liar and was Sacked from The Investigation thirteen years ago.

And yet you keep banging on about him as if he were important.

[G-Unit]

This is why your thinking is flawed.

Only in your opinion.

Not in mine, you believe the mccs ....I dont believe the mccs. its just boils down to a difference of opinion that's all.

I remember Kate McCann being upset by the assistant chief constable of Leicestershire Police;

He had come out to Portugal shortly after Madeleine’s abduction and had seen us at our most griefstricken, and yet he felt able to comment of Gerry and me in this statement;

‘While one or both of them may be innocent, there is no clear evidence that eliminates them from involvement in Madeleine’s disappearance.’ [madeleine]

Surprisingly, Kate offers no evidence which could eliminate them. She seems to think that it's enough to see their grief. Demonstrating grief is one thing, and many have done it. Convincing people that it's related to innocence is something else altogether.

[Eleanor]

And yet you keep banging on about him as if he were important.

You think?  I am hardly complimentary.  Perhaps you should have a word or two with him.

[Eleanor]

I remember Kate McCann being upset by the assistant chief constable of Leicestershire Police;

He had come out to Portugal shortly after Madeleine’s abduction and had seen us at our most griefstricken, and yet he felt able to comment of Gerry and me in this statement;

‘While one or both of them may be innocent, there is no clear evidence that eliminates them from involvement in Madeleine’s disappearance.’ [madeleine]

Surprisingly, Kate offers no evidence which could eliminate them. She seems to think that it's enough to see their grief. Demonstrating grief is one thing, and many have done it. Convincing people that it's related to innocence is something else altogether.

You think.  The McCanns never did have to prove their Innocence.

[Eleanor]

This is why your thinking is flawed.

Only in your opinion.

Not in mine, you believe the mccs ....I dont believe the mccs. its just boils down to a difference of opinion that's all.

Hopefully.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Prove this extraordinary statement and I'll give you a hat fashioned from Lego, a petrified dog egg and a signed paperback copy of The Pelican Brief.
Conduct a straw poll in the streets of Dudley.

Do you even know why sceptics are called sceptics?  It's because they are sceptical about the McCanns' version of events.  That means they believe they are liars, and therefore guilty at the very least of a cover up.  No need for any straw polls, and you can keep your dog egg.  Ta. 

[kizzy]

Because the still doesn't understand the basics...he still thinks calpol is a sedative for instance

Yet after everything he has seen and heard also privy to inside info it seems he still thinks the mccs are responsable it seems.

He was there a senior detective at the time...wrote a book ...and the book is still there for all to read today.

To me its obvious they needed to get rid of him as imo he was on the right track.

The constitution of Kate Healy and Gerald McCann, Madeleine's parents, as “arguidos" should have marked a turnaround in the relationship among the police forces and the couple. If, on the Portuguese police side, the break occurred, it seems that the same cannot be said of the English police. There was an agreement between the two police forces to move forward in an investigation that was seriously considering the possibility that the child died in the apartment, but suddenly the English police veered without consistent technical explanation - as we shall see further. We have always found it odd the way the couple were treated, even after they got their arguido status, and their eventual access to police information.

 I agree with you. If errors were made in this investigation, the delay in changing the status of the McCanns is one of them. There was too much politics and not enough police.

– Well, I wouldn't go that far. The error was to treat the couple "with tweezers". Remember how very soon we saw that many things did not fit and that the McCanns were entitled to privileges. That is not normal !

[Vertigo Swirl]

I remember Kate McCann being upset by the assistant chief constable of Leicestershire Police;

He had come out to Portugal shortly after Madeleine’s abduction and had seen us at our most griefstricken, and yet he felt able to comment of Gerry and me in this statement;

‘While one or both of them may be innocent, there is no clear evidence that eliminates them from involvement in Madeleine’s disappearance.’ [madeleine]

Surprisingly, Kate offers no evidence which could eliminate them. She seems to think that it's enough to see their grief. Demonstrating grief is one thing, and many have done it. Convincing people that it's related to innocence is something else altogether.

Are you for real?  What evidence do you think she could have offered to eliminate them?  Crazy talk, IMO.