Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300470 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jassi

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1380 on: October 14, 2020, 04:30:10 PM »
You think?  I am hardly complimentary.  Perhaps you should have a word or two with him.

As if  @)(++(*

To me, he's an irrelevance.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1381 on: October 14, 2020, 04:50:02 PM »

And yet you keep banging on about him as if he were important.

he is important in as much that he is still spouting his tripe...IMO....and people still believe him

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1382 on: October 14, 2020, 04:51:55 PM »
As if  @)(++(*

To me, he's an irrelevance.

I know that but he doesn't.

So why does he keep on interfering?  He'll be appearing in a German Court the next you know.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1383 on: October 14, 2020, 04:53:07 PM »

Yet after everything he has seen and heard also privy to inside info it seems he still thinks the mccs are responsable it seems.

He was there a senior detective at the time...wrote a book ...and the book is still there for all to read today.

To me its obvious they needed to get rid of him as imo he was on the right track.

The constitution of Kate Healy and Gerald McCann, Madeleine's parents, as “arguidos" should have marked a turnaround in the relationship among the police forces and the couple. If, on the Portuguese police side, the break occurred, it seems that the same cannot be said of the English police. There was an agreement between the two police forces to move forward in an investigation that was seriously considering the possibility that the child died in the apartment, but suddenly the English police veered without consistent technical explanation - as we shall see further. We have always found it odd the way the couple were treated, even after they got their arguido status, and their eventual access to police information.

 I agree with you. If errors were made in this investigation, the delay in changing the status of the McCanns is one of them. There was too much politics and not enough police.

– Well, I wouldn't go that far. The error was to treat the couple "with tweezers". Remember how very soon we saw that many things did not fit and that the McCanns were entitled to privileges. That is not normal !


you may be impressed with amarals version of events ..  To me he was a bent cop who didnt understand the evidence...both those statemnts being factual not opinion

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1384 on: October 14, 2020, 04:55:15 PM »
I remember Kate McCann being upset by the assistant chief constable of Leicestershire Police;

He had come out to Portugal shortly after Madeleine’s abduction and had seen us at our most griefstricken, and yet he felt able to comment of Gerry and me in this statement;

‘While one or both of them may be innocent, there is no clear evidence that eliminates them from involvement in Madeleine’s disappearance.’ [madeleine]

Surprisingly, Kate offers no evidence which could eliminate them. She seems to think that it's enough to see their grief. Demonstrating grief is one thing, and many have done it. Convincing people that it's related to innocence is something else altogether.

do you feel CB should have to prove his innocence or does that only apply to the McCanns....thats quite hypocritical if thats what you think

Offline The General

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1385 on: October 14, 2020, 04:59:50 PM »
he is important in as much that he is still spouting his tripe...IMO....and people still believe him
Spout tripe. Get paid. Rinse. Repeat.
And I'll tell you this much, triple it if CB is discounted.
It's a numbers game; a game of two halves; jumpers for goalposts.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1386 on: October 14, 2020, 05:09:56 PM »
Spout tripe. Get paid. Rinse. Repeat.
And I'll tell you this much, triple it if CB is discounted.
It's a numbers game; a game of two halves; jumpers for goalposts.

But his tripe will be mere offal if CB is charged....as I think he may well be. What will that do for amarals ....portugals....and the SCs reputation

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1387 on: October 14, 2020, 05:14:30 PM »
But his tripe will be mere offal if CB is charged....as I think he may well be. What will that do for amarals ....portugals....and the SCs reputation

I think Portugal's reputation is already down the pan.  They have lost the lot.

Offline The General

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1388 on: October 14, 2020, 05:15:32 PM »
But his tripe will be mere offal if CB is charged....as I think he may well be. What will that do for amarals ....portugals....and the SCs reputation
That's the game. He pushed all in 13 years ago, Dav, I don't think he's bothered.
Who knows, given the perverse nature of social media and the gutter press, he may even find himself even more in demand.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1389 on: October 14, 2020, 05:29:30 PM »
That's the game. He pushed all in 13 years ago, Dav, I don't think he's bothered.
Who knows, given the perverse nature of social media and the gutter press, he may even find himself even more in demand.
the thing is we don't know...and when we don'y know its like a vacuum...you can put any old rubbish in there

Offline jassi

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1390 on: October 14, 2020, 06:08:37 PM »
I think Portugal's reputation is already down the pan.  They have lost the lot.

You may think so. but I don't think that most of the world is in the least interested.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline jassi

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1391 on: October 14, 2020, 06:15:15 PM »
he is important in as much that he is still spouting his tripe...IMO....and people still believe him

Which people ?
Are they of any consequence?
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1392 on: October 14, 2020, 06:27:06 PM »
you may be impressed with amarals version of events ..  To me he was a bent cop who didnt understand the evidence...both those statemnts being factual not opinion

No you dont need GA to tell you were the mccs were concerned -  something wasn't right IMO

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1393 on: October 14, 2020, 06:37:49 PM »
Which people ?
Are they of any consequence?
No, thankfully.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline jassi

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1394 on: October 14, 2020, 06:39:56 PM »
No, thankfully.

So why does anyone get worked up about him ?
Is it all because he defeated the McCann in the Portuguese Courts ?
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future