Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300299 times)

0 Members and 26 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1455 on: October 15, 2020, 03:14:44 PM »
How many Serial Child Sex Abusers and Rapists could there have been wandering around Praia da Luz on the 3rd of May 2007?

They live amongst us.

Rowley 2017:Q&A:Q: The theory of a sex predator responsible for Maddie’s disappearance is something the Portuguese
police have focussed on. How big a part of your investigation has that been, because there were a
series of sex attack on sleeping, mainly British children in nearby resorts. So how important has that
been to your investigation?
MR: That has been one key line of enquiry. The reality is in any urban area, you cast your net wide
and you find a whole range of offences and sex offenders who live nearby and those coincidences
need to be sifted out;
what is a coincidence and what could be linked to the investigation we are
currently dealing with and just like we do in London we have been doing in Portugal so offences which
could be linked have to be looked at and either ruled in or ruled out and that’s the work we have been
doing.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1456 on: October 15, 2020, 03:44:14 PM »
They live amongst us.

Rowley 2017:Q&A:Q: The theory of a sex predator responsible for Maddie’s disappearance is something the Portuguese
police have focussed on. How big a part of your investigation has that been, because there were a
series of sex attack on sleeping, mainly British children in nearby resorts. So how important has that
been to your investigation?
MR: That has been one key line of enquiry. The reality is in any urban area, you cast your net wide
and you find a whole range of offences and sex offenders who live nearby and those coincidences
need to be sifted out;
what is a coincidence and what could be linked to the investigation we are
currently dealing with and just like we do in London we have been doing in Portugal so offences which
could be linked have to be looked at and either ruled in or ruled out and that’s the work we have been
doing.

Such a pity Amaral didn't do that.

Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1457 on: October 15, 2020, 04:26:43 PM »
Ive expalined taht many times. The evidence the PJ had showed nothing it was  so weak. The Smith sighting is evidence ...is it enough to show Gerry carried MMs body...no

Is it even strong enough to prove the Smith sighting conclusively ?

In my opinion it is proven that there is not a scintilla of evidence pointing towards the McCanns.

We do not know what evidence there is against Brueckner ... but the Germans do and they appear to be quite convinced by it and have put that opinion into the public domain.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1458 on: October 15, 2020, 04:42:30 PM »
How many Serial Child Sex Abusers and Rapists could there have been wandering around Praia da Luz on the 3rd of May 2007?

Members appear to be of the opinion the place was crawling with them.  Even to the extent that a three year old child was unable to walk a few yards down a road without encountering one or if not that a drunken driver mounting the pavement to get her.

It certainly is true that the area did seem to attract them like flies but I wonder if they were all checked out and eliminated from the inquiry.  Was Brueckner?
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1459 on: October 15, 2020, 04:48:43 PM »
Is it even strong enough to prove the Smith sighting conclusively ?

In my opinion it is proven that there is not a scintilla of evidence pointing towards the McCanns.

We do not know what evidence there is against Brueckner ... but the Germans do and they appear to be quite convinced by it and have put that opinion into the public domain.

but the Germans do and they appear to be quite convinced by it and have put that opinion into the public domain.

What exactly does that prove.

GA is convinced mccs involved he did the same but in your post you say there wasn't a scintilla of evidence.

So why should it prove anything or the germans be any different.
.

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1460 on: October 15, 2020, 05:04:30 PM »
Such a pity Amaral didn't do that.

I thought one of the criticism's of your nemesis was he'd ruled CB out,so he must have done so.
Still must have been all of 24hrs you'd manage to hold off dragging him in,you sure the bonus isn't in play.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1461 on: October 15, 2020, 05:22:00 PM »
but the Germans do and they appear to be quite convinced by it and have put that opinion into the public domain.

What exactly does that prove.

GA is convinced mccs involved he did the same but in your post you say there wasn't a scintilla of evidence.

So why should it prove anything or the germans be any different.
.

I find your posts becoming more and more of an irrelevance.  They really do seem to be stuck well in the mistakes of the past.  Didn't you notice the world has turned (nope, it isn't flat after all) and current happenings have left you and your opinions far behind while most other people have moved on.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1462 on: October 15, 2020, 05:29:33 PM »
I find your posts becoming more and more of an irrelevance.  They really do seem to be stuck well in the mistakes of the past.  Didn't you notice the world has turned (nope, it isn't flat after all) and current happenings have left you and your opinions far behind while most other people have moved on.

Perhaps it would be add to the smooth running of the forum if you were a tad more respectful to fellow members, even if you don’t agree with them ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1463 on: October 15, 2020, 05:33:24 PM »
I find your posts becoming more and more of an irrelevance.  They really do seem to be stuck well in the mistakes of the past.  Didn't you notice the world has turned (nope, it isn't flat after all) and current happenings have left you and your opinions far behind while most other people have moved on.

This sadly is true.  Nothing of any content other than an outdated opinion.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1464 on: October 15, 2020, 05:35:54 PM »
but the Germans do and they appear to be quite convinced by it and have put that opinion into the public domain.

What exactly does that prove.

GA is convinced mccs involved he did the same but in your post you say there wasn't a scintilla of evidence.

So why should it prove anything or the germans be any different.
.
Amaral didn't understand the evidence... fact..

I don't expect the Germans to be so totally inept...we will see

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1465 on: October 15, 2020, 05:36:47 PM »
This sadly is true.  Nothing of any content other than an outdated opinion.

And the usual bullying attitude.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1466 on: October 15, 2020, 05:41:20 PM »
Perhaps it would be add to the smooth running of the forum if you were a tad more respectful to fellow members, even if you don’t agree with them ?
I thought you didn’t want to be seen as a hypocrite?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1467 on: October 15, 2020, 05:50:59 PM »
according to the Germans CB in a paedophile chat reoom...no doubt the dark web...

Who doesnt want to capture something small...and use it for days


I will document exactly how they will be tortured



Does that not show an intent?

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1468 on: October 15, 2020, 05:53:57 PM »
according to the Germans CB in a paedophile chat reoom...no doubt the dark web...

Who doesnt want to capture something small...and use it for days


I will document exactly how they will be tortured



Does that not show an intent?

Even 60 Minutes said it was an ‘alleged’ conversation. Says it all really.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1469 on: October 15, 2020, 05:54:10 PM »
I find your posts becoming more and more of an irrelevance.  They really do seem to be stuck well in the mistakes of the past.  Didn't you notice the world has turned (nope, it isn't flat after all) and current happenings have left you and your opinions far behind while most other people have moved on.

IMO nothing has really moved from 13 year ago - apart from a dozen suspects to accommodate the abduction that has come to nothing.

Seems you put your faith in any suspect till the next one come along is that what you call moving forward.

The mistakes of the past was treating this as an abduction in the first place.

Believe what you want but the fact is Maddie is classed as missing [not abducted] and the mccs are still not cleared of any involve ment .

I think you will find that goes right back to the 3 may 2007.

You may be a mod B but get off your pedestal because that doesn't give you the right to tell me what my opinions should be.