Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300072 times)

0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Myster

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1485 on: October 16, 2020, 04:57:33 AM »
Jane Tanner saw Tannerman, who may or may not be a paedo.

The Smiths saw Smithman who possibly might be the same man as Tannerman.  Same man or not, he may , or may not be a pa*do.

So how do you KNOW that nobody saw one that night ?

Pa*dos do not walk around with the words PA*DO blazoned across their chests, you know Angelo.
Some do... https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/crime/sick-paedophile-celebratory-tattoo-chest-12540727

... and another could be a lanky, Jag-driving German burglar fortunate enough to knock down a three-year old wandering around in the dark, then whisk her off never to be seen again.
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1486 on: October 16, 2020, 07:03:58 AM »

There is way far less evidence against The McCanns than were is against Brueckner.

Can anyone refute this?

Offline Myster

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1487 on: October 16, 2020, 07:20:50 AM »
There is way far less evidence against The McCanns than were is against Brueckner.

Can anyone refute this?
The sceptic tank installed in 2007 is now overflowing with effluent and needs a good clearout and cleansing to bring it up to date with current investigations by a competent German police force.
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1488 on: October 16, 2020, 07:32:28 AM »
The sceptic tank installed in 2007 is now overflowing with effluent and needs a good clearout and cleansing to bring it up to date with current investigations by a competent German police force.
Its now full of bull that Charlie boy wot dunnit.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1489 on: October 16, 2020, 07:32:49 AM »
The sceptic tank installed in 2007 is now overflowing with effluent and needs a good clearout and cleansing to bring it up to date with current investigations by a competent German police force.

That is funny.  My Septic Tank will now forever remain a Sceptic Tank.

Meanwhile, if The Germans remain unable to prove that Brueckner dunnit I hope they have got enough obscene pornography to keep him locked up way beyond 2024.  This man is effluent in itself.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1490 on: October 16, 2020, 07:36:07 AM »
Some do... https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/crime/sick-paedophile-celebratory-tattoo-chest-12540727

... and another could be a lanky, Jag-driving German burglar fortunate enough to knock down a three-year old wandering around in the dark, then whisk her off never to be seen again.

Changing his car registaration coiuld be because he did not want to be picked up by the police on automatic number recognition...now why would he suddenly be concerned about this the day after MM disappeared

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1491 on: October 16, 2020, 07:40:07 AM »
Changing his car registaration coiuld be because he did not want to be picked up by the police on automatic number recognition...now why would he suddenly be concerned about this the day after MM disappeared

Perhaps he didn't know which car he would be driving on that day and only thought about on the next morning.

Very, very fishy.

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1492 on: October 16, 2020, 11:00:36 AM »
The sceptic tank installed in 2007 is now overflowing with effluent and needs a good clearout and cleansing to bring it up to date with current investigations by a competent German police force.

IMO

What if this competent german police force have gone as far as they can go - were the so-called abduction is concerned of Maddie.

Seems then it will be back to square one - right back to 5a 2007.

Unless OG comes up with another prime suspect.

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1493 on: October 16, 2020, 11:35:49 AM »
IMO

What if this competent german police force have gone as far as they can go - were the so-called abduction is concerned of Maddie.

Seems then it will be back to square one - right back to 5a 2007.

Unless OG comes up with another prime suspect.

Theres no sign of them bringing Madeleine and CB together for him to have done the evil deed.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1494 on: October 16, 2020, 11:42:36 AM »
IMO

What if this competent german police force have gone as far as they can go - were the so-called abduction is concerned of Maddie.

Seems then it will be back to square one - right back to 5a 2007.

Unless OG comes up with another prime suspect.

we will know in the coming two months according to HCW..if CB is charged and convicted it will prove a lot of people have been wrong all along
« Last Edit: October 16, 2020, 11:46:18 AM by Davel »

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1495 on: October 16, 2020, 11:45:49 AM »
we will know in the coming two months according to HCW

He said at the start it wouldn't carry on after a couple months, four months ago,not as slam dunk as he thought.I'd imagine many thought the same back in 2007,look how that turned out.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1496 on: October 16, 2020, 11:46:54 AM »
He said at the start it wouldn't carry on after a couple months, four months ago,not as slam dunk as he thought.

no he said by the end of the year

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1497 on: October 16, 2020, 11:53:28 AM »
we will know in the coming two months according to HCW..if CB is charged and convicted it will prove a lot of people have been wrong all along

You thought that two month ago nothing seems to be movinng though does it.

No further on than CWH speaking to sky.

I have said several times it seems to me CHW is using the maddie case for maximum publicity to solve other cases.

12 mins in .Madeleine McCann: In The Frame


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_TCXe6AFYQ

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1498 on: October 16, 2020, 11:59:54 AM »
You thought that two month ago nothing seems to be movinng though does it.

No further on than CWH speaking to sky.

I have said several times it seems to me CHW is using the maddie case for maximum publicity to solve other cases.

12 mins in .Madeleine McCann: In The Frame


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_TCXe6AFYQ

Dont misrepresent what I have said...HCW made it clear he was talking about the end of the year....the rest of your post is just sceptic specualtion. Sceptics are so convinced of the McCanns guilt they cannot accept that CB even may be involved. as another poster posted...

The sceptic tank installed in 2007 is now overflowing with effluent and needs a good clearout and cleansing to bring it up to date with current investigations by a competent German police force.

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1499 on: October 16, 2020, 12:04:21 PM »
Dont misrepresent what I have said...HCW made it clear he was talking about the end of the year....the rest of your post is just sceptic specualtion. Sceptics are so convinced of the McCanns guilt they cannot accept that CB even may be involved. as another poster posted...

The sceptic tank installed in 2007 is now overflowing with effluent and needs a good clearout and cleansing to bring it up to date with current investigations by a competent German police force.

Competence will only be proved once Wolters reveals how the two came together for his suspect to have done for Madeleine,previous reports had him admitting no forensics,no body,one hell of a tea leave reader.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.