Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300315 times)

0 Members and 26 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1545 on: October 16, 2020, 10:16:26 PM »
So would you let a stranger come into your house and look after your (hypothetical) kids while you were out?

I don't really much care what happens to my hypothetical children.

They've gone to live with their hypothetical mother on account of them being annoying brats & quite frankly I am glad to be rid of them.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1546 on: October 16, 2020, 10:21:22 PM »
I don't really much care what happens to my hypothetical children.

They've gone to live with their hypothetical mother on account of them being annoying brats & quite frankly I am glad to be rid of them.
Thanks for your non-answer.  It seems to me that as DBS checks mean nothing according to you, anyone hiring a babysitter at a holiday resort would basically be risking exposing their child to a paedophile and would therefore be committing an act of gross neglect. 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1547 on: October 16, 2020, 10:27:14 PM »
Because you are leaving your children alone in the care of one person... children are regularly abused by babysitters

Not by Mark Warner nannies I would hope.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1548 on: October 16, 2020, 10:32:40 PM »

It is horrifying how many Paedophiles get involved in Child Care.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1549 on: October 16, 2020, 10:40:17 PM »
What is a DBS check?
"uCheck is recognised by the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS – formerly the Criminal Record Bureau) as a top Responsible Organisation for Basic Checks and a Registered Umbrella Body for Standard and Enhanced Checks.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Anthro

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CBm
« Reply #1550 on: October 16, 2020, 10:44:38 PM »
I don't know how Mark Warner advertised their holidays. I imagine child friendly described their packages rather than specific destinations.

If you trust someone to keep your child safe all day when swimming and sailing why on earth would you hesitate to trust them in the evening when the child's safely sleeping?
The caretakers/nannies were working shifts. Whoever was on duty during the day, would not be doing night-shift. Madeleine’s parents took it upon themselves to care for their children and frequently checking on them. I would have done exactly the same, given the scenario.

Offline Anthro

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1551 on: October 16, 2020, 10:47:22 PM »
It is horrifying how many Paedophiles get involved in Child Care.
Yes, Eleanor. Jos Brech is another example. His trial is in process in the death of Nicky Verstappen 20 years ago.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CBm
« Reply #1552 on: October 16, 2020, 11:22:59 PM »
The caretakers/nannies were working shifts. Whoever was on duty during the day, would not be doing night-shift. Madeleine’s parents took it upon themselves to care for their children and frequently checking on them. I would have done exactly the same, given the scenario.

You would have left three children under 5 years of age in an unlocked apartment, checking them every 30 minutes?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CBm
« Reply #1553 on: October 16, 2020, 11:26:55 PM »
You would have left three children under 5 years of age in an unlocked apartment, checking them every 30 minutes?

Do we have to do this again?  I did it in the past and so did a lot of people.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CBm
« Reply #1554 on: October 16, 2020, 11:38:18 PM »
You would have left three children under 5 years of age in an unlocked apartment, checking them every 30 minutes?
She just said so didn’t she?  Of course you have no right to judge her or to find her actions wanting, you said so yourself earlier.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CBm
« Reply #1555 on: October 16, 2020, 11:43:39 PM »
Do we have to do this again?  I did it in the past and so did a lot of people.

When I was young (about 6 years old) I was out all day in the school holidays and no adult knew where I was because my Mother had to work so I had a key safety-pinned into my pocket to get into our house. That was then. Anyone doing that now would be in trouble imo.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CBm
« Reply #1556 on: October 16, 2020, 11:57:17 PM »
When I was young (about 6 years old) I was out all day in the school holidays and no adult knew where I was because my Mother had to work so I had a key safety-pinned into my pocket to get into our house. That was then. Anyone doing that now would be in trouble imo.

Everything changed when Madeleine was abducted from her bed. We all became afraid and a lot of children lost their freedom to roam and the sense of adventure that went with that.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CBm
« Reply #1557 on: October 17, 2020, 12:07:43 AM »
Everything changed when Madeleine was abducted from her bed. We all became afraid and a lot of children lost their freedom to roam and the sense of adventure that went with that.

Perhaps people who left their children sleeping and went out on the lash may have changed their behaviour but few other parents.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CBm
« Reply #1558 on: October 17, 2020, 12:11:42 AM »
Everything changed when Madeleine was abducted from her bed. We all became afraid and a lot of children lost their freedom to roam and the sense of adventure that went with that.

My children were never allowed the freedoms I was allowed and enjoyed as a child as a direct result of the moors murderers Hindley and Brady.

Going from swallows and amazons to lockdown and surveillance in one fell swoop.  Madeleine's disappearance was another landmark in reinforcing the destruction of freedoms for our children.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CBm
« Reply #1559 on: October 17, 2020, 12:44:59 AM »
My children were never allowed the freedoms I was allowed and enjoyed as a child as a direct result of the moors murderers Hindley and Brady.

Going from swallows and amazons to lockdown and surveillance in one fell swoop.  Madeleine's disappearance was another landmark in reinforcing the destruction of freedoms for our children.

I don’t think that’s necessarily true. Few parents would ever have considered their children safe if left alone at night in an adult free house...and I’m sure few do now. I’m sure though that the Moors murders and the murders of Holly, Jessica and Sarah Payne did make parents more wary when letting their children out to play during the day, not not Madeleine’s disappearance.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?