Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300390 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1575 on: October 17, 2020, 11:23:13 AM »
I don't think he is. To me everything he has said makes perfect sense. Imo you can't accept it because it contradicts everything you have believed in the last 13 years.

If If I believed that Maddie had been abducted from her bed ...I would not have been on here at all..... let alone 13 years.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1576 on: October 17, 2020, 11:26:40 AM »
If If I believed that Maddie had been abducted from her bed ...I would not have been on here at all..... let alone 13 years.
I think you are wrong and Maddie was abducted...we may soon find out

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1577 on: October 17, 2020, 11:35:50 AM »
I think you are wrong and Maddie was abducted...we may soon find out

Or maybe CW will be clearing out his desk.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1578 on: October 17, 2020, 11:38:01 AM »
Or maybe CW will be clearing out his desk.

We need to wait and see...it's pointless speculating when we will soon know

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1579 on: October 17, 2020, 11:41:17 AM »
We need to wait and see...it's pointless speculating when we will soon know

Are you hoping for a confession to a cell mate.... Seems that is what they are relying on.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1580 on: October 17, 2020, 11:46:41 AM »
Are you hoping for a confession to a cell mate.... Seems that is what they are relying on.
I've explained why that isn't true...we just need to wait

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1581 on: October 17, 2020, 11:48:38 AM »
I think Brueckner will say nothing, produce no alibi thereby making himself look guilty and then be convicted.

Offline sadie

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1582 on: October 17, 2020, 12:52:19 PM »
I think Brueckner will say nothing, produce no alibi thereby making himself look guilty and then be convicted.

Pretty much what I am thinking Elli.

In my case, however, I  believe that if he was commissioned to abduct Madeleine and became involved, which admittedly does look likely, that he will be too frightened to let on who commissioned him, cos he doesn't want to be tortured.   To probably lose his testicles, fingers, toes, ears etc. and further tortured, maybe to death, as has happened to others who have 'crossed' these people.
I think he will prefer jail to that.


And then the case will be "solved" and the bad guys still free, their ancient benevolent appearing organisations unblemished and they will be able to carry on raking The Mega Bucks in ad infinitum.  Some of the Organisations I have looked at have a history of helping underpriviledged and sick people in a very well publicized way as a cover for their black side.
Their black side, meanwhile, rakes the mega lolly in from such things as gun running, human slavery including sex trafficking and blackmail, extortion etc, drug trafficking and so on …..


The world at the same time, thinks they are wonderful people.  This scenario they have assisted by awarding different parts of their diverse organisations with the highest honours.  They each award the others with these honours, so over the centuries they build up an impressive array of the highest level of "do gooders" and along with their wealth and power become untouchables.       They operate in "Plain Sight", because the ordinary man, (us), only sees the good side and holds them in such high esteem that they are never connected to the baddies. 
It's the "MagicK" of the Untouchables.   

As I have said,  it is my opinion that Breuckner could be at the receiving end of this terrifying group.


The above are just my thoughts but based upon a great deal of information from the internet.
And, I could be wrong; I know that.

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1583 on: October 17, 2020, 01:07:33 PM »
Pretty much what I am thinking Elli.

In my case, however, I  believe that if he was commissioned to abduct Madeleine and became involved, which admittedly does look likely, that he will be too frightened to let on who commissioned him, cos he doesn't want to be tortured.   To probably lose his testicles, fingers, toes, ears etc. and further tortured, maybe to death, as has happened to others who have 'crossed' these people.
I think he will prefer jail to that.


And then the case will be "solved" and the bad guys still free, their ancient benevolent appearing organisations unblemished and they will be able to carry on raking The Mega Bucks in ad infinitum.  Some of the Organisations I have looked at have a history of helping underpriviledged and sick people in a very well publicized way as a cover for their black side.
Their black side, meanwhile, rakes the mega lolly in from such things as gun running, human slavery including sex trafficking and blackmail, extortion etc, drug trafficking and so on …..


The world at the same time, thinks they are wonderful people.  This scenario they have assisted by awarding different parts of their diverse organisations with the highest honours.  They each award the others with these honours, so over the centuries they build up an impressive array of the highest level of "do gooders" and along with their wealth and power become untouchables.       They operate in "Plain Sight", because the ordinary man, (us), only sees the good side and holds them in such high esteem that they are never connected to the baddies. 
It's the "MagicK" of the Untouchables.   

As I have said,  it is my opinion that Breuckner could be at the receiving end of this terrifying group.


The above are just my thoughts but based upon a great deal of information from the internet.
And, I could be wrong; I know that.

Bolded bit,refreshingly honest.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1584 on: October 17, 2020, 01:11:52 PM »
Bolded bit,refreshingly honest.

Yes it's a shame sceptics can't be honest and admit that the case could be solved with CB as the abductor

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1585 on: October 17, 2020, 01:46:54 PM »
Sceptics are very good at this.

I thought that you didn’t do hypocrisy.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1586 on: October 17, 2020, 03:14:19 PM »
Yes it's a shame sceptics can't be honest and admit that the case could be solved with CB as the abductor

Not a chance he is NOT Smithman.
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1587 on: October 17, 2020, 03:59:36 PM »
Yes it's a shame sceptics can't be honest and admit that the case could be solved with CB as the abductor

I expect it could if only they could find the evidence they need. At the moment it's not available it seems.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1588 on: October 17, 2020, 04:02:25 PM »
I expect it could if only they could find the evidence they need. At the moment it's not available it seems.
We don't know what evidence they have ....enough to show Maddie is dead and CB killed her we have been informed..

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1589 on: October 17, 2020, 07:37:18 PM »
We don't know what evidence they have ....enough to show Maddie is dead and CB killed her we have been informed..

But not enough to prove it.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0