Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300388 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1590 on: October 17, 2020, 07:39:02 PM »
But not enough to prove it.

That would be up to the Judge I think you will find......enough circumstantial to support it and he may well be able to.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1591 on: October 17, 2020, 07:50:22 PM »
That would be up to the Judge I think you will find......enough circumstantial to support it and he may well be able to.

The judge can't judge until the prosecutor feels he has enough to charge his suspect. At the moment he doesn't think he has.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1592 on: October 17, 2020, 08:00:54 PM »
The judge can't judge until the prosecutor feels he has enough to charge his suspect. At the moment he doesn't think he has.

Thats an assumption by you......we dont know  what evidence HCW now has. Again I think its  ajudge who decides if a suspect is charged...not the prosecutor

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1593 on: October 17, 2020, 08:05:17 PM »
The first phase of a German criminal prosecution is pre-trial investigation to determine if there are grounds for a formal indictment. If a prosecutor determines that there is, the case is transferred to the appropriate German court, where the presiding judge decides if the evidence warrants a trial.

So HCW cannot simply charge CB and carry on collecting evidence for the trial. He must present his evidnece to a judge who decides if a trial takes place

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1594 on: October 17, 2020, 08:06:51 PM »
The first phase of a German criminal prosecution is pre-trial investigation to determine if there are grounds for a formal indictment. If a prosecutor determines that there is, the case is transferred to the appropriate German court, where the presiding judge decides if the evidence warrants a trial.

So HCW cannot simply charge CB and carry on collecting evidence for the trial. He must present his evidnece to a judge who decides if a trial takes place

The Inquisitorial System in Europe.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1595 on: October 17, 2020, 08:07:57 PM »
Thats an assumption by you......we dont know  what evidence HCW now has. Again I think its  ajudge who decides if a suspect is charged...not the prosecutor

There will be the equivalent of the DPP in Germany and they will decide if there is enough evidence for charges to be laid.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1596 on: October 17, 2020, 08:11:14 PM »
There will be the equivalent of the DPP in Germany and they will decide if there is enough evidence for charges to be laid.

so tell me at what stage is  asuspect charged in Germany....

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1597 on: October 17, 2020, 08:15:09 PM »
so tell me at what stage is  asuspect charged in Germany....

Like here, when there is enough evidence.

Of course that is when a case is conducted properly.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1598 on: October 18, 2020, 12:25:10 PM »
That would be up to the Judge I think you will find......enough circumstantial to support it and he may well be able to.

The circumstantional it seem is just the phone ping.



“Detectives know the case is hanging by a thread and that the next 10 weeks between now and the end of the year are absolutely vital if they are going to be able to solve the case and find answers.


CW tells the world maddie is dead and he has the proof CB killed her, would you not call that evidence to charge CB


With the clock ticking in the case there have been reports suggesting a fellow an inmate in Kiel Prison may have been recruited by detectives to get the jailed sex-offender to talk.

That prompted Christian B to insist he won’t all for “dirty tricks” he believes German cops have been using to try and get him to confess to taking Madeleine.


Seems the link what barrier provided shows they are not abouve board, to get what they want.IMO



http://www.albanylawreview.org/Articles/Vol77_3/77.3.1139%20Grunewald.pdf




Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1599 on: October 18, 2020, 12:44:37 PM »
The circumstantional it seem is just the phone ping.



“Detectives know the case is hanging by a thread and that the next 10 weeks between now and the end of the year are absolutely vital if they are going to be able to solve the case and find answers.


CW tells the world maddie is dead and he has the proof CB killed her, would you not call that evidence to charge CB


With the clock ticking in the case there have been reports suggesting a fellow an inmate in Kiel Prison may have been recruited by detectives to get the jailed sex-offender to talk.

That prompted Christian B to insist he won’t all for “dirty tricks” he believes German cops have been using to try and get him to confess to taking Madeleine.


Seems the link what barrier provided shows they are not abouve board, to get what they want.IMO



http://www.albanylawreview.org/Articles/Vol77_3/77.3.1139%20Grunewald.pdf

Sceptics may just keep on hoping to their hearts' content but I don't think things are ever going to be quite the same for them in the future.

Whatever happens regarding Brueckner I am sure his mere existence is a game changer.  Making the unfounded and unsubstantiated nonsense which has been spouted about innocents for the past thirteen+ years even more untenable than it always was.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1600 on: October 18, 2020, 12:45:57 PM »
The circumstantional it seem is just the phone ping.



“Detectives know the case is hanging by a thread and that the next 10 weeks between now and the end of the year are absolutely vital if they are going to be able to solve the case and find answers.


CW tells the world maddie is dead and he has the proof CB killed her, would you not call that evidence to charge CB


With the clock ticking in the case there have been reports suggesting a fellow an inmate in Kiel Prison may have been recruited by detectives to get the jailed sex-offender to talk.

That prompted Christian B to insist he won’t all for “dirty tricks” he believes German cops have been using to try and get him to confess to taking Madeleine.


Seems the link what barrier provided shows they are not abouve board, to get what they want.IMO



http://www.albanylawreview.org/Articles/Vol77_3/77.3.1139%20Grunewald.pdf

Im confident HCW has evidence/proof of abduction...whether he can tie CB to it is another matter...we will see.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1601 on: October 18, 2020, 01:18:24 PM »
Im confident HCW has evidence/proof of abduction...whether he can tie CB to it is another matter...we will see.

Not sounding quite as confident there Davel.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1602 on: October 18, 2020, 01:20:24 PM »
Not sounding quite as confident there Davel.

My level of  confidence hasnt changed...my approach has.



Offline pathfinder73

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1603 on: October 18, 2020, 01:21:22 PM »
Im confident HCW has evidence/proof of abduction...whether he can tie CB to it is another matter...we will see.

You clearly don't have a clue about evidence in this case. He has nothing as you will soon find out from the Bluffer! Concrete evidence  *%87
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1604 on: October 18, 2020, 01:23:44 PM »
The only evidence Wolters has is that Madeleine is missing,clearly he can't marry the two coming together so that his suspect did for Madeleine.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.