Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB

[Eleanor]

Kizzy seems think the test would be proof...it isn't ...she's mistaken..she needs to get her facts right before making accusations

My point was that Sceptics wouldn't accept the result if The McCanns passed this test.

[kizzy]

My point was that Sceptics wouldn't accept the result if The McCanns passed this test.

I would as to me it would be the natural thing to do if you knew you were not involved in anything.

Especially the situation they found themselves in. I would be appalled to think I was a suspect in what happened to my daughter.

The so-called abduction would also be credible IMO.

Just out of curiosity how many on here would refuse to do one if they were in the mccs position.

[Mr Gray]

I would as to me it would be the natural thing to do if you knew you were not involved in anything.

Especially the situation they found themselves in. I would be appalled to think I was a suspect in what happened to my daughter.

The so-called abduction would also be credible IMO.

Just out of curiosity how many on here would refuse to do one if they were in the mccs position.

Anyone with any intelligence would refuse as they would understand they are not reliable....

[faithlilly]

Can't you all see the reaction. 

McCanns pass Lie Detector Test.

Lie Detector Tests aren't reliable and inadmissible anyway.

Agreed, I don’t think it would have changed anything but it does look bad when parents of a missing child say that they will take a lie detector test to prove their innocence and don’t. IMO it’s beyond stupid to suggest they’d do it in the first place.

[Eleanor]

I would as to me it would be the natural thing to do if you knew you were not involved in anything.

Especially the situation they found themselves in. I would be appalled to think I was a suspect in what happened to my daughter.

The so-called abduction would also be credible IMO.

Just out of curiosity how many on here would refuse to do one if they were in the mccs position.

They are neither Reliable or legal In Law.  So what would be the point?

[The General]

In fairness, if I was in their position I wouldn't take a lie detector test either. Why should they?

[Eleanor]

Agreed, I don’t think it would have changed anything but it does look bad when parents of a missing child say that they will take a lie detector test to prove their innocence and don’t. IMO it’s beyond stupid to suggest they’d do it in the first place.

Only if required to do so, By Law.  Which it isn't, for obvious reasons.

[faithlilly]

In fairness, if I was in their position I wouldn't take a lie detector test either. Why should they?

Absolutely, so why did they ?

[kizzy]

Anyone with any intelligence would refuse as they would understand they are not reliable....

Well, I would think its the right thing to do if you had the intelligence to try and prove you did not halm your daughter or caused her harm.

The worst that could have probably happen it could be inconclusive a bit like the dogs.

Or IMO proved something more sinister. but if you had done nothing wrong then nothing to fear

if it proved nothing at least they would have had the guts to do it for there daughters sake oh and their reputation. IMO.

IIRC wasn't there a petition from tens of thousands and thousands of people for them to do one.

[Eleanor]

Absolutely, so why did they ?

Did they?  I must have missed that.

[faithlilly]

Did they?  I must have missed that.

I think that that’s been proved beyond doubt.

[Mr Gray]

Agreed, I don’t think it would have changed anything but it does look bad when parents of a missing child say that they will take a lie detector test to prove their innocence and don’t. IMO it’s beyond stupid to suggest they’d do it in the first place.

im sure they never said they would take one

[faithlilly]

im sure they never said they would take one

Then you’d be wrong.

[Eleanor]

im sure they never said they would take one

And nor did they take one.  Even The Portuguese aren't that daft.

[Mr Gray]

Well, I would think its the right thing to do if you had the intelligence to try and prove you did not halm your daughter or caused her harm.

The worst that could have probably happen it could be inconclusive a bit like the dogs.

Or IMO proved something more sinister. but if you had done nothing wrong then nothing to fear

if it proved nothing at least they would have had the guts to do it for there daughters sake oh and their reputation. IMO.

IIRC wasn't there a petition from tens of thousands and thousands of people for them to do one.

do you still not understand.......the test would not prove anything. It would not help their daughter or their reputation...