Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300268 times)

0 Members and 19 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1770 on: October 22, 2020, 01:18:50 PM »
The source said, "Kate and Gerry are happy to do anything that will help clear their names.”
https://themaddiecasefiles.com/we-ll-do-lie-test-the-sun-21-09-07-t3058.html

"Anything" didn't include a lie detector test unless it was requested and run by police, however. Therefore they wouldn't just do "anything", would they? That isn't innuendo nor libel, it's a factual account of what was reported.

thats your opinion and wrong...a lie detector would not help clear their names as they are not reliable...you are quoting opinin as fact contrary to forum rules

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1771 on: October 22, 2020, 01:21:01 PM »
You can’t produce the cite, can you ? That’s okay, we’re used to it from you.

And I'm used to it from you ...gunit and others. I've provide one but Im not going to spend time finding the other.
I know its true...thats good enough for me. If I happen to come across it again I'll post it
« Last Edit: October 22, 2020, 02:12:45 PM by Davel »

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1772 on: October 22, 2020, 02:20:35 PM »
How can they move the investigation on if they can't be trusted?

Ask the police forces who use them for that purpose.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1773 on: October 22, 2020, 02:24:03 PM »
And I'm used to it from you ...gunit and others. I've provide one but Im not going to spend time finding the other.
I know its true...thats good enough for me. If I happen to come across it again I'll post it

Like the parents and their lie detector offer....say you’ll do it then baulk when you know you’re asked to.

Chilly this time of year with no clothes.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1774 on: October 22, 2020, 02:29:52 PM »
Like the parents and their lie detector offer....say you’ll do it then baulk when you know you’re asked to.

Chilly this time of year with no clothes.

The parents never said they would do it...you have failed to show they did.

If I thought your view was of any importance whatsoever I might look for it...but I'm not in the slightest bothered what you think.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1775 on: October 22, 2020, 02:31:27 PM »
Ask the police forces who use them for that purpose.

You would also need to ask the police forces who dont...which their are obviously considerably more. I can see that they may well cause more problems for the investigation

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1776 on: October 22, 2020, 02:34:56 PM »
thats your opinion and wrong...a lie detector would not help clear their names as they are not reliable...you are quoting opinin as fact contrary to forum rules

I'm talking about what was reportedly said, not why it was said, which is what you are referring to.  "a lie detector would not help clear their names as they are not reliable" is your opinion, not said by the McCanns and not a fact.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1777 on: October 22, 2020, 02:35:48 PM »
The parents never said they would do it...you have failed to show they did.

If I thought your view was of any importance whatsoever I might look for it...but I'm not in the slightest bothered what you think.

IMO it's like not answering the questions ....there was something not right with finding Maddie gone from her bed.
 
Also the lead up to it.Again IMO.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1778 on: October 22, 2020, 02:50:33 PM »
The parents never said they would do it...you have failed to show they did.

If I thought your view was of any importance whatsoever I might look for it...but I'm not in the slightest bothered what you think.

Your failure is seen by the whole forum not just me.....yeh, I guess you’re used to the disdain of ours.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1779 on: October 22, 2020, 02:52:22 PM »
I'm talking about what was reportedly said, not why it was said, which is what you are referring to.  "a lie detector would not help clear their names as they are not reliable" is your opinion, not said by the McCanns and not a fact.

A lie detector would not help clear their names is not opinion...its fact

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1780 on: October 22, 2020, 02:54:52 PM »
Your failure is seen by the whole forum not just me.....yeh, I guess you’re used to the disdain of ours.

again I'm not in the slightest bothered....your and other sceptics opinion of me is of no importance ..only  a fool would think it is...you obviously do

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1781 on: October 22, 2020, 03:03:47 PM »
A lie detector would not help clear their names is not opinion...its fact

How do you know when they never took one .

How can you call it a fact?

what makes you think it would not clear their name "if" they passed it.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1782 on: October 22, 2020, 03:11:58 PM »
How do you know when they never took one .

How can you call it a fact?

what makes you think it would not clear their name "if" they passed it.

They are not reliable....if they passed it would not mean they were innocent.....they could have simply beaten the test. I practice meditaion....Im sure I could beat it eassily

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1783 on: October 22, 2020, 03:22:49 PM »
They are not reliable....if they passed it would not mean they were innocent.....they could have simply beaten the test. I practice meditaion....Im sure I could beat it eassily

In my opinion it would have been enough to redirect the police’s focus...that’s the point.
« Last Edit: October 22, 2020, 08:31:19 PM by Brietta »
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1784 on: October 22, 2020, 03:35:48 PM »
It would have been enough to redirect the police’s focus...that’s the point.

That's your opinion..that's the point...and you don't seem to understand that simple fact