« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 122 123 [124] 125 126 ... 224   Go Down

Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300266 times)

0 Members and 19 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1845 on: October 23, 2020, 06:00:41 PM »
Quote from: Wonderfulspam on October 23, 2020, 05:27:04 PM

Not once have SY said

a) That there's no evidence against the McCanns

& b) That they didn't do it.
yes they have and yes they have.
Logged
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Anthro

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1846 on: October 23, 2020, 06:13:35 PM »
Quote from: kizzy on October 23, 2020, 04:24:14 PM
Oh right why do you think that

Could be the reason he was only 60/80% sure rather than 100% imo

He obviously could see to describe the colour of clothing.
Not at all what I meant. Also, when our kids were small, my husband would carry them off a plane in the exact same way as Madeleine’s father.
Logged

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1847 on: October 23, 2020, 06:34:34 PM »
This was the important point in Martin Smith's statement

It was the way Gerard McCann turned his head down which was similar to what the individual did on 3rd May 2007 when we met him
Logged
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1848 on: October 23, 2020, 07:02:36 PM »
Imagine you were out in town a few months ago around 10pm and you passed a guy carrying a child who looked down as you passed them.  You  didn’t see their face clearly, it was quite dark and the whole encounter took less than 10 seconds.  How confident would you be in you ability to accurately describe theit facial features to detectives?

How many different ways are there for a human being to tilt their head down and is it such a unique movement that you would be able to id someone from that head tilt months after seeing it happen?

IMo the evidence of the Smith sighting is utterly fantastical.  I accept it happened but I don’t accept it’s possible to create an accurate artist impression or to id anyone by a head movement, especially not months after the event.  It’s utter nonsense.
Logged
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1849 on: October 23, 2020, 07:04:33 PM »
Quote from: Vertigo Swirl on October 23, 2020, 07:02:36 PM
Imagine you were out in town a few months ago around 10pm and you passed a guy carrying a child who looked down as you passed them.  You  didn’t see their face clearly, it was quite dark and the whole encounter took less than 10 seconds.  How confident would you be in you ability to accurately describe theit facial features to detectives?

How many different ways are there for a human being to tilt their head down and is it such a unique movement that you would be able to id someone from that head tilt months after seeing it happen?

IMo the evidence of the Smith sighting is utter fantastical.  I accept it happened but I don’t accept it’s possible to create an accurate artist impression or to id anyone by a head movement, especially not months after the event.  It’s utter nonsense.

This is all very well but it still doesn't mean it wasn't Gerry.
Logged
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1850 on: October 23, 2020, 07:04:59 PM »
Quote from: Wonderfulspam on October 23, 2020, 07:04:33 PM
This is all very well but it still doesn't mean it wasn't Gerry.
It doesn’t mean it wasn’t Prince Andrew either.
Logged
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1851 on: October 23, 2020, 07:06:18 PM »
Quote from: Vertigo Swirl on October 23, 2020, 07:04:59 PM
It doesn’t mean it wasn’t Prince Andrew either.

Prince Andrew probably wasn't in PDL.

Gerry definitely was.
Logged
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1852 on: October 23, 2020, 07:07:42 PM »
Quote from: Wonderfulspam on October 23, 2020, 07:06:18 PM
Prince Andrew probably wasn't in PDL.

Gerry definitely was.
So was Christian Bruckener.
Logged
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1853 on: October 23, 2020, 07:35:32 PM »
Quote from: Wonderfulspam on October 23, 2020, 07:06:18 PM
Prince Andrew probably wasn't in PDL.

Gerry definitely was.

Does it have a Pizza Express ?
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1854 on: October 23, 2020, 08:16:44 PM »
Logged
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1855 on: October 23, 2020, 08:26:45 PM »
Quote from: G-Unit on October 23, 2020, 08:16:44 PM
Allegedly.
His phone was, someone must have been using it.  How often do you lend your mobile to others to take away and use?  I have never done so in 20 years of using one.
Logged
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1856 on: October 23, 2020, 08:33:05 PM »
Quote from: Vertigo Swirl on October 23, 2020, 08:26:45 PM
His phone was, someone must have been using it.  How often do you lend your mobile to others to take away and use?  I have never done so in 20 years of using one.

His alleged phone.
Logged
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1857 on: October 23, 2020, 08:42:03 PM »
Quote from: G-Unit on October 23, 2020, 08:33:05 PM
His alleged phone.
Alleged by the German prosecutor - do you think he decided it was on a whim?
Logged
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1858 on: October 23, 2020, 08:43:09 PM »
Quote from: Vertigo Swirl on October 23, 2020, 08:26:45 PM
His phone was, someone must have been using it.  How often do you lend your mobile to others to take away and use?  I have never done so in 20 years of using one.

You know who else had a phone that they used there that night?

Gerry.
Logged
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1859 on: October 23, 2020, 08:57:43 PM »
Quote from: Wonderfulspam on October 23, 2020, 08:43:09 PM
You know who else had a phone that they used there that night?

Gerry.
I know, as do the police who subjected it to forensic scrutiny and found nothing suspicious.
Logged
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".
Pages: 1 ... 122 123 [124] 125 126 ... 224   Go Up
« previous next »