Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300423 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1890 on: October 24, 2020, 01:24:49 PM »
Has he not already served time for that, as it was found several years ago ?

Please may I have a Cite for that?

Offline jassi

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1891 on: October 24, 2020, 01:33:11 PM »
Please may I have a Cite for that?

As I posed it as a question, rather than as a fact, it doesn't need a cite from me
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline G-Unit

Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline jassi

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1893 on: October 24, 2020, 01:41:51 PM »
Possibly;

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8654423/Madeleine-McCann-prime-suspect-secret-stash-391-child-porn-photos-68-videos.html

Thank you, that's more or less what I remember.

From that article - "Police said the videos had been downloaded from the internet and stored on the camera’s memory card."

So not all his own work.
« Last Edit: October 24, 2020, 01:46:22 PM by jassi »
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1894 on: October 24, 2020, 01:48:13 PM »

"Possibly" isn't good enough.

He seems to have served a sentence only for Abusing a Child and not for possessing Pornography.

Offline jassi

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1895 on: October 24, 2020, 01:56:19 PM »
"Possibly" isn't good enough.

He seems to have served a sentence only for Abusing a Child and not for possessing Pornography.

Clutching at straws. It's quite clear that the memory sticks and cards were raised during the trial as a major part of the evidence -
"The camera and its contents became the main evidence against Brueckner, 42, during two trials in which he was accused of sexually abusing the girl and possessing child pornography. "
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1896 on: October 24, 2020, 01:58:29 PM »
Clutching at straws. It's quite clear that the memory sticks and cards were raised during the trial as a major part of the evidence -
"The camera and its contents became the main evidence against Brueckner, 42, during two trials in which he was accused of sexually abusing the girl and possessing child pornography. "

You seem to be confusing two different incidents...there is one involving a camera and another re the buried memory sticks

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1897 on: October 24, 2020, 01:59:43 PM »
Clutching at straws. It's quite clear that the memory sticks and cards were raised during the trial as a major part of the evidence -
"The camera and its contents became the main evidence against Brueckner, 42, during two trials in which he was accused of sexually abusing the girl and possessing child pornography. "

So you think he should go free?

Offline jassi

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1898 on: October 24, 2020, 02:30:56 PM »
So you think he should go free?

He should be punished for whatever he is found guilty of - but not twice for offences already dealt with.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1899 on: October 24, 2020, 02:45:15 PM »
He should be punished for whatever he is found guilty of - but not twice for offences already dealt with.

As far as I can see it was just images of the child he was convicted of abusing.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1900 on: October 24, 2020, 02:53:29 PM »
He should be punished for whatever he is found guilty of - but not twice for offences already dealt with.

Isn't it strange that sceptics who had no problem with the PJ beating a confession out of Cipriano are now so concerned with justice

Offline jassi

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1901 on: October 24, 2020, 02:53:36 PM »
As far as I can see it was just images of the child he was convicted of abusing.

That's because that's what you want to see.
My opinion is that the child abuse and the porno pictures were all part of the same  charges.
Not that it matters, for having been part of the evidence at that trial, they cannot be used again  in a different trial.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1902 on: October 24, 2020, 03:04:36 PM »
That's because that's what you want to see.
My opinion is that the child abuse and the porno pictures were all part of the same  charges.
Not that it matters, for having been part of the evidence at that trial, they cannot be used again  in a different trial.

I think you could be wrong about this.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1903 on: October 24, 2020, 03:05:37 PM »
Isn't it strange that sceptics who had no problem with the PJ beating a confession out of Cipriano are now so concerned with justice

It would be hilarious.  If it was funny.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1904 on: October 24, 2020, 03:07:36 PM »
That's because that's what you want to see.
My opinion is that the child abuse and the porno pictures were all part of the same  charges.
Not that it matters, for having been part of the evidence at that trial, they cannot be used again  in a different trial.

The memory cards founf under his dead dog haven't been used as part of any trial.