Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300602 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2310 on: October 31, 2020, 11:56:31 AM »
Martin Smith.

Kate's prints on the window.

Shifty parents.

In other words your opinion has no basis.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2311 on: October 31, 2020, 12:06:10 PM »
In other words your opinion has no basis.

My opinion is entirely based on evidence.



Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2312 on: October 31, 2020, 12:16:11 PM »
My opinion is entirely based on evidence.

Like David Icke

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2313 on: October 31, 2020, 12:54:13 PM »
Martin Smith.

Kate's prints on the window.

Shifty parents.

None that point at charlie boy,save words of a German geezer.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2314 on: October 31, 2020, 01:46:45 PM »
Martin Smith.

Kate's prints on the window.

Shifty parents.
Wot?  Not the Woofers?!
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2315 on: October 31, 2020, 01:55:35 PM »
Your opinion really doesn't matter. 

It is the evidence that matters. 

The Policia Judiciaria didn't come up with any and that is on record in their Final Report. 

Ignoring that fact won't make it go away and I cannot fathom why you find yourself still unable to accept the facts as they very obviously stand ~ that there is NO evidence against the McCanns ~ and the investigation is into Madeleine's abduction by a stranger.

There is more circumstantial evidence IMO  for the mccs - than CB being a so-called abductor.

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2316 on: October 31, 2020, 02:03:52 PM »
I think it's highly probable there is now proof or at least concrete evidence of abduction

The only concrete evidence IMO is Maddie was removed from that room.

Who removed her is the question.

We know the mcs were definitely in the apartment ....what you don't know is was CB.


Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2317 on: October 31, 2020, 02:06:26 PM »
In other words your opinion has no basis.

Do you think yours does?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2318 on: October 31, 2020, 02:21:03 PM »
The only concrete evidence IMO is Maddie was removed from that room.

Who removed her is the question.

We know the mcs were definitely in the apartment ....what you don't know is was CB.

HCW says he has a lot more. He is not speaking for himself but a team of detectives. I have seen no one officially questioning what hes saying. Even CBs lawyer is asking to see the evidence...rather than saying HCW doesnt have any.
« Last Edit: October 31, 2020, 03:24:28 PM by Davel »

Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2319 on: October 31, 2020, 03:27:45 PM »
There is more circumstantial evidence IMO  for the mccs - than CB being a so-called abductor.

Then list what you think it is.  Shouldn't be too difficult for you.  You did start the thread.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2320 on: October 31, 2020, 03:37:18 PM »
HCW says he has a lot more. He is not speaking for himself but a team of detectives. I have seen no one officially questioning what hes saying. Even CBs lawyer is asking to see the evidence...rather than saying HCW doesnt have any.

Ha asking to see the evidence it seems shows he believes HCW hasn't got any to show.

Surely you must know if it was as strong as what you think ...it wouldn't matter whether FF knew or didn't know what it was.

Seems very weak if Wolters is going to wait til Disclosure to show what he has..

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2321 on: October 31, 2020, 03:46:51 PM »
Ha asking to see the evidence it seems shows he believes HCW hasn't got any to show.

Surely you must know if it was as strong as what you think ...it wouldn't matter whether FF knew or didn't know what it was.

Seems very weak if Wolters is going to wait til Disclosure to show what he has..

I dont think any of that makes any sense...there are seevral possibilities why HCW is waiting. he was aked in the podcast if CB was working alone...he declined to answer. ther may be others being investigated and to speak now would japordise the investigation.

I note you cannot come up with any evidence against the McCanns. The dog alerts are not circumstantial evidence

Offline Lace

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2322 on: October 31, 2020, 04:13:31 PM »
Martin Smith.

Kate's prints on the window.

Shifty parents.

I'd cross the Smith's out.   One said the person had light brown hair!!  Not a tourist!!   Martin Smith said he looked like Gerry by the way he carried his son off the plane,  he carried his son off the plane the same as millions of parents have.

Silly Kate,  open the window to stage an abduction and didn't wipe her finger prints off the glass [she's not that stupid]

The last one 'shifty parents'  is just the way you portray them,  all the people who lived around the McCann's said they were lovely people,  you don't know them they do.

Offline Lace

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2323 on: October 31, 2020, 04:15:18 PM »
My opinion is entirely based on evidence.


Sorry    (&^&

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2324 on: October 31, 2020, 05:07:01 PM »
I'd cross the Smith's out.   One said the person had light brown hair!!  Not a tourist!!   Martin Smith said he looked like Gerry by the way he carried his son off the plane,  he carried his son off the plane the same as millions of parents have.

Silly Kate,  open the window to stage an abduction and didn't wipe her finger prints off the glass [she's not that stupid]

The last one 'shifty parents'  is just the way you portray them,  all the people who lived around the McCann's said they were lovely people,  you don't know them they do.

Evidence can be open to interpretation.  IMO

« Last Edit: October 31, 2020, 05:28:46 PM by Brietta »
Christian Brueckner Fan Club