Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300563 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2415 on: November 03, 2020, 06:56:44 PM »
Double jeapordy
I was wondering if that "Double Jeopardy" rule applies in Germany.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2416 on: November 03, 2020, 06:57:58 PM »
So if he wasn't in prison they would have just left him wondering about ...knowing he had killed a child.

Cant, you see how absurd it is if they have proof he killed Maddie. that they haven't charged him.

How can you think that this makes any sense?

''Maybe we hope to have something by the Spring of 2021, maybe it could take longer but certainly nothing this year".

It looks like their appeal was the last throw of the dice to get the evidence they need and it has failed to appear so far.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2417 on: November 03, 2020, 07:27:24 PM »
It looks like their appeal was the last throw of the dice to get the evidence they need and it has failed to appear so far.

As I recall the last throw of the dice was around 2016....I wouldnt beleive everything you read in the sun. this interview may have been weeks ago. There is a thread that runs through everything proof/strong evidence of death...which imo will prove abduction

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2418 on: November 03, 2020, 10:52:37 PM »
As I recall the last throw of the dice was around 2016....I wouldnt beleive everything you read in the sun. this interview may have been weeks ago. There is a thread that runs through everything proof/strong evidence of death...which imo will prove abduction
Thread as in the line of thought, not a thread on the forum.
« Last Edit: November 04, 2020, 08:11:52 AM by Robittybob1 »
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Lace

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2419 on: November 04, 2020, 08:47:07 AM »
Good point.

Reminds me of gmcc planning concerts in advance when Maddie could have been found that day.

Then he would have cancelled it.   This has been taken out of all proportion.   Gerry was planning something,  but obviously if Madeleine was found it would be cancelled.   How easy is that to understand?

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2420 on: November 04, 2020, 10:42:30 AM »
Then he would have cancelled it.   This has been taken out of all proportion.   Gerry was planning something,  but obviously if Madeleine was found it would be cancelled.   How easy is that to understand?
Concerts - must have missed that show!
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2421 on: November 05, 2020, 04:56:05 PM »
this is part of what sceptics seem to think is evidence against the McCanns...the fact that the dogs alerted only in 5a and not the other four apartments...but looking at the times from the files the dgs only spent 3 miniutes in three apartments...5 in  another...but 50 in 5a. Did they only alert in 5a because they spent longer and were repeatedly called back to places they originally ignored.

5A:

From 8.30pm to 9.20pm, the dogs go through.
8.20pm: The cadaver dog, "marks," the couple's wardrobe area in the bedroom.
8.22pm: The cadaver dog, "marks" an area behind the sofa in the sitting room near the window overlooking the road.
From 8.47pm to 9.20pm, the blood detecting dog goes through.
8.10 (should it be 9.10?) The dog, "marks" an area of floor behind the sofa in the sitting room, near the window overlooking the road.

5B: 9.24 to 9.27pm: The cadaver dog did not alert on anything.

5D: 9.29 to 9.34pm: The cadaver dog did not alert on anything.

5H : 9.35 to 9.38pm : The cadaver dog did not alert on anything.

4G : 9.42 to 9.45pm : The cadaver dog did not alert on anything.
« Last Edit: November 05, 2020, 05:59:57 PM by Davel »

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2422 on: November 05, 2020, 05:25:29 PM »
Then he would have cancelled it.   This has been taken out of all proportion.   Gerry was planning something,  but obviously if Madeleine was found it would be cancelled.   How easy is that to understand?

The point is most parents wouldn’t even admit to themselves that they wouldn’t have found their child days, weeks or months ahead let alone organising concerts.

I think that’s what made people rather suspicious of Gerry, he appeared to like the limelight a tad too much.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2423 on: November 05, 2020, 06:17:18 PM »
The point is most parents wouldn’t even admit to themselves that they wouldn’t have found their child days, weeks or months ahead let alone organising concerts.

I think that’s what made people rather suspicious of Gerry, he appeared to like the limelight a tad too much.
Could you provide a cite (remind me) about Gerry organising concerts, please?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2424 on: November 05, 2020, 06:17:59 PM »
Could you provide a cite (remind me) about Gerry organising concerts, please?

Could anyone provide a cite (reminding me) about Gerry organising concerts, please?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2425 on: November 05, 2020, 06:37:49 PM »
The point is most parents wouldn’t even admit to themselves that they wouldn’t have found their child days, weeks or months ahead let alone organising concerts.

I think that’s what made people rather suspicious of Gerry, he appeared to like the limelight a tad too much.
Fearing the media might "go off" the story at any time, the police organised a variety of headline-grabbing events - and in return, the public and the media displayed great willingness to help.

As the investigation entered its third week, the problem for the family and the police was how to keep it in the media spotlight. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/831699.stm



The McCanns received no assistance from the police to publicise Madeleine's disappearance and to seek help from the public so they had to do it themselves.

Did they do wrong?  Do you think it is inappropriate to publicise a missing child?  The questions are rhetorical ~ I already know what your answer is.

"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2426 on: November 05, 2020, 06:51:40 PM »
Shame on Gerry for trying to come up with innovative ways to keep his child’s disappearance high profile.  He should of course have kept his trap shut, kept his head down and hoped the whole thing blew over quickly so he and his remaining family could get on with enjoying their lives and soending all that lovely donation money on speedboats and diamond earrings. 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2427 on: November 05, 2020, 07:50:23 PM »
Fearing the media might "go off" the story at any time, the police organised a variety of headline-grabbing events - and in return, the public and the media displayed great willingness to help.

As the investigation entered its third week, the problem for the family and the police was how to keep it in the media spotlight. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/831699.stm



The McCanns received no assistance from the police to publicise Madeleine's disappearance and to seek help from the public so they had to do it themselves.

Did they do wrong?  Do you think it is inappropriate to publicise a missing child?  The questions are rhetorical ~ I already know what your answer is.

I think it’s odd that as grieving parents they were able to contemplate that days, weeks or months ahead that they wouldn’t have their daughter back. Most parents wouldn’t be able to even go there, mentally.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2428 on: November 05, 2020, 07:55:01 PM »
I think it’s odd that as grieving parents they were able to contemplate that days, weeks or months ahead that they wouldn’t have their daughter back. Most parents wouldn’t be able to even go there, mentally.

Worst Case Scenario.

Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2429 on: November 05, 2020, 07:59:11 PM »
I think it’s odd that as grieving parents they were able to contemplate that days, weeks or months ahead that they wouldn’t have their daughter back. Most parents wouldn’t be able to even go there, mentally.

Sara Payne did it.

I think the lesson to be learned from these two cases is take a pro-active stance on behalf of your missing child and all too soon for Sara your murdered child ~ expect to be viciously trolled.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....