Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300493 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2535 on: November 07, 2020, 12:45:12 PM »
You jumped to the conclusion that if the dogs alerted to Christian Bs locations I wouldn’t accept he was Madeleines abductor and killer. That is a conclusion you jumped to. Its all in your post. Read it back.
OK I jumped to that conclusion- now you’ve put me straight.  Happy Days! Now what?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Icanhandlethetruth

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2536 on: November 07, 2020, 12:48:54 PM »
OK I jumped to that conclusion- now you’ve put me straight.  Happy Days! Now what?
Now what? How should I know do whatever you want.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2537 on: November 07, 2020, 12:49:01 PM »
Well yes when I joined I saw it as a discussion forum but over time since I joined, to me it has taken the appearance of a 13 year long argument where no point can be conceded.
BTW not trying to butter you up but you are still my favourite moderator very reasoned and fair. I appreciate the difficult work you do here.

Gosh.  Thank You.  I do try.

Of course it is a thirteen year long argument.  That is why we are still discussing it.  But this is still the only McCann Forum that allows opposing views.  So don't imagine that your views aren't important.

But sometimes you have to be made of stern stuff.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2538 on: November 07, 2020, 12:50:22 PM »
I see you simply disagree with what I have said without adressing any of the issues I've raise..perhaps that's because you can't.

i have provided evidence as to why i challenge the validity of the alertas...what evidence do you have to doubt Wolters.

Do you have s cite that Grime was best in his area of expertise...both a UK one and one from the FBI

Grime was "a Subject Matter Expert registered with N.C.P.E. and specialist homicide canine search advisor. In support of the national Homicide Search Advisor, Mark Harrison" https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES_PERSONAL.htm

As such his advice would be diseminated to ACPO, and thence to their forces. Although he worked for Yorkshire Police, he and his dogs were also used by other forces.

The dog handler that deployed the victim recovery dogs, Martin Grime, is a world-wide renowned expert in the field of cadaver dogs. Mr. Grime was hired by the FBI to come to America and help them establish a cadaver dog program.
https://www.loudoun.gov/DocumentCenter/View/152001/06202019---Virginia-Court-of-Appeals-Affirmed-the-Convictions-Against-Braulio-Castillo?bidId=
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2539 on: November 07, 2020, 12:50:38 PM »
Good point G-Unit. Last night I was going to open a thread saying that for all “supporters” imagine the dogs were never summoned in 2007 but instead in 2020 and alerted to Christian Bs house, car, and clothing where he lived in 2007. What would be the opinions not just on these alerts but on all dog alerts, It may be different. But then I thought what’s the point.
Jumping to the conclusion that there would be no point because...?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Icanhandlethetruth

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2540 on: November 07, 2020, 12:52:19 PM »
Jumping to the conclusion that there would be no point because...?
Yes that's exactly the same scenario. Bravo!

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2541 on: November 07, 2020, 12:52:37 PM »
Now what? How should I know do whatever you want.
Well you asked me a question and then ignored my reply, preferring it seems to prolong an argument about jumping to conclusions.  I thought my reply might lead to a more on topic reply but it seems not.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Icanhandlethetruth

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2542 on: November 07, 2020, 12:54:06 PM »
Well you asked me a question and then ignored my reply, preferring it seems to prolong an argument about jumping to conclusions.  I thought my reply might lead to a more on topic reply but it seems not.
Which reply did I ignore?

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2543 on: November 07, 2020, 12:58:26 PM »
Grime was "a Subject Matter Expert registered with N.C.P.E. and specialist homicide canine search advisor. In support of the national Homicide Search Advisor, Mark Harrison" https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES_PERSONAL.htm

As such his advice would be diseminated to ACPO, and thence to their forces. Although he worked for Yorkshire Police, he and his dogs were also used by other forces.

The dog handler that deployed the victim recovery dogs, Martin Grime, is a world-wide renowned expert in the field of cadaver dogs. Mr. Grime was hired by the FBI to come to America and help them establish a cadaver dog program.
https://www.loudoun.gov/DocumentCenter/View/152001/06202019---Virginia-Court-of-Appeals-Affirmed-the-Convictions-Against-Braulio-Castillo?bidId=

Excuse me.  America already had a Cadaver Dog Programme.  Grime didn't invent it.  What a laugh to suggest he did.

However, American Courts were a bit more honest about the possible failings of Cadaver Dogs.

No person should ever be Convicted on the dubious evidence of such a dog.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2544 on: November 07, 2020, 12:59:44 PM »
Grime was "a Subject Matter Expert registered with N.C.P.E. and specialist homicide canine search advisor. In support of the national Homicide Search Advisor, Mark Harrison" https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES_PERSONAL.htm


where does it say in the above he was the best in the area of his expertise...it says he is A sub[Name removed]ect amtter expert  not the best in his field

As such his advice would be diseminated to ACPO, and thence to their forces. Although he worked for Yorkshire Police, he and his dogs were also used by other forces.

The dog handler that deployed the victim recovery dogs, Martin Grime, is a world-wide renowned expert in the field of cadaver dogs. Mr. Grime was hired by the FBI to come to America and help them establish a cadaver dog program.
https://www.loudoun.gov/DocumentCenter/View/152001/06202019---Virginia-Court-of-Appeals-Affirmed-the-Convictions-Against-Braulio-Castillo?bidId=

this is not from the FBI and it doesnt say hes the best in his field


you have not provided a cite that supports your claim

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2545 on: November 07, 2020, 01:00:50 PM »
Grime was "a Subject Matter Expert registered with N.C.P.E. and specialist homicide canine search advisor. In support of the national Homicide Search Advisor, Mark Harrison" https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES_PERSONAL.htm

As such his advice would be diseminated to ACPO, and thence to their forces. Although he worked for Yorkshire Police, he and his dogs were also used by other forces.

The dog handler that deployed the victim recovery dogs, Martin Grime, is a world-wide renowned expert in the field of cadaver dogs. Mr. Grime was hired by the FBI to come to America and help them establish a cadaver dog program.
https://www.loudoun.gov/DocumentCenter/View/152001/06202019---Virginia-Court-of-Appeals-Affirmed-the-Convictions-Against-Braulio-Castillo?bidId=

Cite for...Mr. Grime was hired by the FBI to come to America and help them establish a cadaver dog program.

The FBI alraedy had one...who is the author of this claim
« Last Edit: November 07, 2020, 01:03:48 PM by Davel »

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2546 on: November 07, 2020, 01:05:50 PM »
Grime was "a Subject Matter Expert registered with N.C.P.E. and specialist homicide canine search advisor. In support of the national Homicide Search Advisor, Mark Harrison" https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES_PERSONAL.htm

As such his advice would be diseminated to ACPO, and thence to their forces. Although he worked for Yorkshire Police, he and his dogs were also used by other forces.

The dog handler that deployed the victim recovery dogs, Martin Grime, is a world-wide renowned expert in the field of cadaver dogs. Mr. Grime was hired by the FBI to come to America and help them establish a cadaver dog program.
https://www.loudoun.gov/DocumentCenter/View/152001/06202019---Virginia-Court-of-Appeals-Affirmed-the-Convictions-Against-Braulio-Castillo?bidId=

This Comment has just about turned my Tripes.

America needed Martin Grime.  Who'd a thought it?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2547 on: November 07, 2020, 01:06:16 PM »
Which reply did I ignore?
The one in which I answered your question about how I would feel about dog alerts to CB's possessions.  You seem to have quite a short memory!
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Icanhandlethetruth

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2548 on: November 07, 2020, 01:09:09 PM »
The one in which I answered your question about how I would feel about dog alerts to CB's possessions.  You seem to have quite a short memory!
That doesn’t mean I ignored it. I read it and accepted it as your point of view.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2549 on: November 07, 2020, 01:11:29 PM »
Okay.  Let's not play word games.  Some of us are very good at spotting this.

I can do this, but have never been able to see the point.