Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300312 times)

0 Members and 26 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Eleanor


Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2671 on: November 08, 2020, 11:13:11 AM »
I agree.
But surely you don’t believe leaving a child asleep and unattended in an unlocked ground floor apartment greatly increases the likelihood of said child being abducted by a local paedophile/rapist/burglar do you??
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline jassi

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2672 on: November 08, 2020, 11:16:00 AM »
But not just yet.  If ever.

While I don't have a firm view on body farms, if other countries already have them for research purposes, why would UK bother with establishing another? Why not just use the reseach findings of other countries ?
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Lace

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2673 on: November 08, 2020, 11:22:11 AM »
I agree.

Blame the parents not the filthy pervert.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2674 on: November 08, 2020, 11:23:22 AM »
While I don't have a firm view on body farms, if other countries already have them for research purposes, why would UK bother with establishing another? Why not just use the reseach findings of other countries ?

A very sensible suggestion.  It isn't all about training Cadaver Dogs.  Very little in fact.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2675 on: November 08, 2020, 11:59:45 AM »
Blame the parents not the filthy pervert.
As you will see from Spam's signature line his sympathies very much lie with the filthy pervert and not the parents, so you have called that correctly.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2676 on: November 08, 2020, 12:15:46 PM »
Blame the parents not the filthy pervert.

I don't see why not.
If parents were more responsible there wouldn't be any abductions.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2677 on: November 08, 2020, 12:30:09 PM »
As you will see from Spam's signature line his sympathies very much lie with the filthy pervert and not the parents, so you have called that correctly.

I do believe MM was abducted but where's the evidence the abductor was a 'filthy pervert'?

Could it be the abductor came to learn MM was left alone night after night in the unlocked apartment and thought she was being neglected?  And of course there was the crying incident too:  "Daddy, daddy" and 'Why didn't you come when Sean and I were crying last night'?

Could it be rather than a filthy pervert the abductor was  a misguided individual, or part of a couple, with altruistic intent? 
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Admin

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2678 on: November 08, 2020, 12:33:51 PM »
In other words, it's your fault if a paedophile steals your child while it is left unattended as you encouraged the paedophile to do this.

Don't think it's a matter of encouraging a paedophile to do such a dreadful thing but a matter of not taking all necessary precautions to protect your children from all danger. Had a fire broken out in the apartment and all three children succumbed to smoke inhalation, would the parents be seen as culpable?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2679 on: November 08, 2020, 12:39:40 PM »
I don't see why not.
If parents were more responsible there wouldn't be any abductions.
But surely you don’t believe leaving a child asleep and unattended in an unlocked ground floor apartment greatly increases the likelihood of said child being abducted by a local paedophile/rapist/burglar do you??
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2680 on: November 08, 2020, 12:42:10 PM »
I do believe MM was abducted but where's the evidence the abductor was a 'filthy pervert'?

Could it be the abductor came to learn MM was left alone night after night in the unlocked apartment and thought she was being neglected?  And of course there was the crying incident too:  "Daddy, daddy" and 'Why didn't you come when Sean and I were crying last night'?

Could it be rather than a filthy pervert the abductor was  a misguided individual, or part of a couple, with altruistic intent?
It's a nice thought, but highly unlikely IMO.  Where is Madeleine now?  How did she manage to make it to 17 without anyone noticing this altruistic couple suddenly had Madeleine McCann (the most famous missing child on the planet) living with them?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Admin

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2681 on: November 08, 2020, 01:01:51 PM »
I do believe MM was abducted but where's the evidence the abductor was a 'filthy pervert'?

Could it be the abductor came to learn MM was left alone night after night in the unlocked apartment and thought she was being neglected?  And of course there was the crying incident too:  "Daddy, daddy" and 'Why didn't you come when Sean and I were crying last night'?

Could it be rather than a filthy pervert the abductor was  a misguided individual, or part of a couple, with altruistic intent?

More likely the child got out and was taken from outside the apartment imho.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2682 on: November 08, 2020, 01:03:48 PM »
I do believe MM was abducted but where's the evidence the abductor was a 'filthy pervert'?

Could it be the abductor came to learn MM was left alone night after night in the unlocked apartment and thought she was being neglected?  And of course there was the crying incident too:  "Daddy, daddy" and 'Why didn't you come when Sean and I were crying last night'?

Could it be rather than a filthy pervert the abductor was  a misguided individual, or part of a couple, with altruistic intent?
From what we have heard the German police have the evidence of murder

Offline Admin

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2683 on: November 08, 2020, 01:15:06 PM »
From what we have heard the German police have the evidence of murder

They haven't shared this information with the parents however which can only mean one thing.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2684 on: November 08, 2020, 01:32:48 PM »
But surely you don’t believe leaving a child asleep and unattended in an unlocked ground floor apartment greatly increases the likelihood of said child being abducted by a local paedophile/rapist/burglar do you??

That's a different debate. Leaving small children home alone is never, ever, a good idea.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0