Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300381 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2700 on: November 08, 2020, 06:04:50 PM »
Were the children put on the ‘at risk ‘ register ? Do we know?

Ive just noticed your new avatar....I said the same some years ago...good to see you've caught on. Being called  a fool by the village idiot is no insult.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2701 on: November 08, 2020, 06:13:42 PM »
What excuses the torture and rape of the American woman in her own home as we contemplate the scenario that the victim ~ not the perpetrator ~ is at fault for the crime.

The primary victim in the McCann case was Madeleine, who was to blame for nothing. It wasn't her job to protect herself.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2702 on: November 08, 2020, 06:16:06 PM »
The primary victim in the McCann case was Madeleine, who was to blame for nothing. It wasn't her job to protect herself.
Who here has suggested otherwise?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2703 on: November 08, 2020, 06:16:41 PM »
The primary victim in the McCann case was Madeleine, who was to blame for nothing. It wasn't her job to protect herself.

Her family are also victims...it may well be if the portuguese judicial system and police had done their job properly she would never have been abducted.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2704 on: November 08, 2020, 06:17:58 PM »
Ive just noticed your new avatar....I said the same some years ago...good to see you've caught on. Being called  a fool by the village idiot is no insult.
Is there an avatar fire sale going on somewhere?  Some people seem to have a new one every week. 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2705 on: November 08, 2020, 06:55:49 PM »
Her family are also victims...it may well be if the portuguese judicial system and police had done their job properly she would never have been abducted.

Fear not.

She wasn't, in my opinion.
« Last Edit: November 08, 2020, 07:27:11 PM by Brietta »
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2706 on: November 08, 2020, 06:57:57 PM »
Fear not.

She wasn't, in my opinion.
Please provide a cite.
« Last Edit: November 08, 2020, 07:27:44 PM by Brietta »
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Lace

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2707 on: November 08, 2020, 07:05:27 PM »
Were the children put on the ‘at risk ‘ register ? Do we know?

You will have to ask Social Services.   People were hoping the twins would be taken away,  they weren't.

Offline Lace

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2708 on: November 08, 2020, 07:07:37 PM »
I don't see why not.
If parents were more responsible there wouldn't be any abductions.

So you expect a paedophile to take a child if its left in bed asleep do you?   That is normal is it?

« Last Edit: November 08, 2020, 07:10:59 PM by John »

Offline John

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2709 on: November 08, 2020, 07:09:57 PM »
What could it mean?

For The Germans to share this at the moment would be a very silly thing to do.

The police are obliged to inform the parents of any missing child if they have found anything of significance. The only situation where this doesn't happen is if the police are convinced that they (parents) know the truth already.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline jassi

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2710 on: November 08, 2020, 07:12:14 PM »
The police are obliged to inform the parents of any missing child if they have found anything of significance. The only situation where this doesn't happen is if the police are convinced that they (parents) know the truth already.

Does this apply in Germany?
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Lace

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2711 on: November 08, 2020, 07:14:37 PM »
The primary victim in the McCann case was Madeleine, who was to blame for nothing. It wasn't her job to protect herself.

Here we go again.   The McCann's thought they would do their own listening services,  apparently the nannies couldn't do it on this holiday complex as it was too spaced out.   They did their own listening service and thought they were keeping their children safe,  they made a wrong decision Madeleine was taken.

Now I wouldn't have left my children alone and no doubt there are a lot who wouldn't either,  but I don't go on and on about it because it has been done and there's nothing the McCann's can do about it now,  they said they wish they could turn back the clock but they can't.  I wouldn't wish this on anyone,  they will have to carry that burden for the rest of their lives. 

It was supposed to have been a family friendly site,  the McCann's said it was very quiet,  maybe if they had read up on the place and realised there were many Paedophiles living around there they wouldn't have even gone there on holiday let alone have left the children alone.

Offline John

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2712 on: November 08, 2020, 07:17:45 PM »
Are you suggesting that Madeleine grazed her knee in the UK and then waited until she reached 5A to squash herself behind a sofa to bleed? That sounds likely (not).

I'm pretty sure you don't have any evidence that TS's grandfather lived in 5A.

I'm not an expert on the training and handling of those dogs, which is why, unlike some, I refrain from criticising the actions of those who are experts.

If I recall correctly, TS"s grandparents did live in 5a but I believe the grandfather died in hospital.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2713 on: November 08, 2020, 07:20:50 PM »
From what we have heard the German police have the evidence of murder

Which begs the question why MET are still treating as a missing person inquiry.
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2714 on: November 08, 2020, 07:26:25 PM »
It's a nice thought, but highly unlikely IMO.  Where is Madeleine now?  How did she manage to make it to 17 without anyone noticing this altruistic couple suddenly had Madeleine McCann (the most famous missing child on the planet) living with them?

Lie low for a while by which time small children change significantly due to normal age related changes in development.
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?