Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300288 times)

0 Members and 27 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2790 on: November 09, 2020, 05:01:23 PM »
That, as they say, is the question. Just one of the questions that some people wonder about and others think should be forgotten.

The questions arose mostly from the accounts given by the T9, of course. It was them who claimed to have left all their children home alone for five nights and it was them who described the checking regime on 3rd May.
No one thinks anything should be forgotten but perhaps you can tell me what bearing Susan Healey’s reaction to the news 13 + years ago has on the question posed?  The only purpose it serves imo is to elicit an emotional, crritcal response about those “neglectful “ parents which we’ve all heard a million times before and whose only purpose now imo is to make the commentator feel superior and to try and put supporters in their place.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2791 on: November 09, 2020, 05:04:58 PM »
No one thinks anything should be forgotten but perhaps you can tell me what bearing Susan Healey’s reaction to the news 13 + years ago has on the question posed?  The only purpose it serves imo is to elicit an emotional, crritcal response about those “neglectful “ parents which we’ve all heard a million times before and whose only purpose now imo is to make the commentator feel superior and to try and put supporters in their place.

Well, that isn't going to work, is it.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2792 on: November 09, 2020, 05:07:40 PM »
No one thinks anything should be forgotten but perhaps you can tell me what bearing Susan Healey’s reaction to the news 13 + years ago has on the question posed?  The only purpose it serves imo is to elicit an emotional, crritcal response about those “neglectful “ parents which we’ve all heard a million times before and whose only purpose now imo is to make the commentator feel superior and to try and put supporters in their place.

But in reality it's pathetic

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2793 on: November 09, 2020, 05:38:33 PM »
Well, that isn't going to work, is it.

True but it does make us feel superior.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2794 on: November 09, 2020, 05:41:54 PM »
No one thinks anything should be forgotten but perhaps you can tell me what bearing Susan Healey’s reaction to the news 13 + years ago has on the question posed?  The only purpose it serves imo is to elicit an emotional, crritcal response about those “neglectful “ parents which we’ve all heard a million times before and whose only purpose now imo is to make the commentator feel superior and to try and put supporters in their place.

Not that I ever thought there was any excuse for the systematic nastiness exhibited as a result but whatever cover they pretended to is well and truly blown.  Never a pretty sight it is really pathetic to behold now in my opinion

The fact it has been sustained for over thirteen+ years in the face of reason is quite extraordinary I think.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2795 on: November 09, 2020, 05:46:59 PM »
Some people are imo addicted to the feeling of  superiority that constantly harping on about the neglect gives them and that’s why they just can’t stop themselves dredging it up at every opportunity imo.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2796 on: November 09, 2020, 07:25:42 PM »
Some people are imo addicted to the feeling of  superiority that constantly harping on about the neglect gives them and that’s why they just can’t stop themselves dredging it up at every opportunity imo.

In my case I talk about the children being left home alone because;

People who like to harp on about abduction want to ignore what made an abduction possible.
It contradicts the claim that the children were a priority.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2797 on: November 09, 2020, 07:48:43 PM »
In my case I talk about the children being left home alone because;

People who like to harp on about abduction want to ignore what made an abduction possible.
It contradicts the claim that the children were a priority.
Do you a cite for this allegation?  How about you take it as read that ALL supporters acknowledge that the McCanns left their kids unattended thus making abduction possible, then you never need remind us again.  WE KNOW OK?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2798 on: November 09, 2020, 08:30:50 PM »
In my case I talk about the children being left home alone because;

People who like to harp on about abduction want to ignore what made an abduction possible.
It contradicts the claim that the children were a priority.

Very contrite regarding their behavior before, during and after the alleged disappearance of MBM. IMO they well and truly absolved themselves of any blame whatsoever.

Now that vile creature masquerading as a human, 'Herr Bruckner' is in the frame for little Madeline's abduction, rape, torture and murder- it puts it all into perspective - The 'parent's were, we are assured by the parents, reasonable parents who just so happened to go jogging and blogging and mingling with celebs, all happy smiley people, not forgetting to make a few million quid, erm for the 'search' you understand.

The are now living the live they created- one daughter missing though - 'not our fault'...
« Last Edit: November 13, 2020, 04:49:17 PM by John »
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2799 on: November 09, 2020, 08:42:31 PM »
In my case I talk about the children being left home alone because;

People who like to harp on about abduction want to ignore what made an abduction possible.
It contradicts the claim that the children were a priority.

The only couple who enrolled their children into both morning and afternoon sessions at the creche.
The only couple who left their apartment insecure and their children especially vulnerable.

I think it’s obvious that their children weren’t the McCann’s priority on that holiday.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2800 on: November 09, 2020, 08:42:58 PM »
Too many spelling errors to be allowed.  My version of Grammarly has identified 13 errors.  Not to mention the bizarre libellous comment at the end. 

"They are living the live they always wanted- one daughter missing- 'not our fault'..."   Are you OK?

I am fine thank you.  what part of their lives have they lost out on?  care to share?

They are missing one daughter and they claimed it was not their fault.    I don't like you much either -thanks for the feedback.
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2801 on: November 09, 2020, 08:44:56 PM »
The only couple who enrolled their children into both morning and afternoon sessions at the creche.
The only couple who left their apartment insecure and their children especially vulnerable.

I think it’s obvious that their children weren’t the McCann’s priority on that holiday.

Very loving 'family' holiday... according to Kate n Gerry  we all do it that way.
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2802 on: November 09, 2020, 08:50:14 PM »
Very loving 'family' holiday... according to Kate n Gerry  we all do it that way.
It is a democracy.  They are allowed to vote for who they like.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2803 on: November 09, 2020, 09:31:53 PM »
It is a democracy.  They are allowed to vote for who they like.

a touch of the JB?
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2804 on: November 09, 2020, 11:10:09 PM »
The McCanns may be the most selfish, cruel, neglectful parents that ever walked the planet (some people obviously believe this to be the case, I don’t) but it does not mean they were involved in covering up their daughter’s death. 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".