Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300426 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Snowgirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2850 on: November 10, 2020, 06:31:31 PM »
Not really if Madeleine got over by the Tapas entrance and she asked for help to open the door. 
What if she actually approached an adult and the adult took advantage?
Do you really believe the story that the door was left unlocked so Madeleiine could come to find them? Her mother later denied she would leave and anyway said the door would be  too heavy for her!

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2851 on: November 10, 2020, 06:35:21 PM »
Do you really believe the story that the door was left unlocked so Madeleiine could come to find them? Her mother later denied she would leave and anyway said the door would be  too heavy for her!

Do you have  acite for...Door would be too heavy for her

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2852 on: November 10, 2020, 06:41:01 PM »
Do you really believe the story that the door was left unlocked so Madeleiine could come to find them? Her mother later denied she would leave and anyway said the door would be  too heavy for her!
Kate is talking about the patio door.  I'm talking about the front door.  Different doors altogether.  And the door to the Tapas entrance is another door as well.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2853 on: November 10, 2020, 06:42:24 PM »
Do you have  acite for...Door would be too heavy for her
That is Snowgirl's opinion in this case.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Snowgirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2854 on: November 10, 2020, 07:00:47 PM »
Do you have  acite for...Door would be too heavy for her
Oh really you’re asking me for a cite now.  (&^&
I quote this and believe it was possibly during that Woman’s Hour interview , after the last line .

Jenny: 'What was your first thought, what did you think immediately had happened?' (Upon discovering that Madeleine wasn't there)

  Kate: 'Well, obviously I kind of looked and double looked and, errm, you know, obviously, there was twenty seconds of, you know, she must be there (laughs). Errm, but there was no doubt in my mind within (laughs) probably thirty seconds, errm, that Madeleine had been taken from that room. I can't go into the reasons why I thought that but it was... no doubt whatsoever. And Madeleine wouldn't have walked out herself. I know that.

So she had said the patio door was left unlocked so Madeleine could get out ,  then here contradicts it by saying she wouldn’t have walked out by herself . I remember too a heavy curtain being mentioned .
« Last Edit: November 10, 2020, 07:04:12 PM by Snowgirl »

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2855 on: November 10, 2020, 07:24:32 PM »
Oh really you’re asking me for a cite now.  (&^&
I quote this and believe it was possibly during that Woman’s Hour interview , after the last line .

Jenny: 'What was your first thought, what did you think immediately had happened?' (Upon discovering that Madeleine wasn't there)

  Kate: 'Well, obviously I kind of looked and double looked and, errm, you know, obviously, there was twenty seconds of, you know, she must be there (laughs). Errm, but there was no doubt in my mind within (laughs) probably thirty seconds, errm, that Madeleine had been taken from that room. I can't go into the reasons why I thought that but it was... no doubt whatsoever. And Madeleine wouldn't have walked out herself. I know that.

So she had said the patio door was left unlocked so Madeleine could get out ,  then here contradicts it by saying she wouldn’t have walked out by herself . I remember too a heavy curtain being mentioned .


laughs laughs... that really irritated me about those two-  the smiles , sN.....s and laughs. She can't go into the reasons why she thought her daughter was taken from the room.. oh wonder why not...
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2856 on: November 10, 2020, 07:29:42 PM »
Oh really you’re asking me for a cite now.  (&^&
I quote this and believe it was possibly during that Woman’s Hour interview , after the last line .

Jenny: 'What was your first thought, what did you think immediately had happened?' (Upon discovering that Madeleine wasn't there)

  Kate: 'Well, obviously I kind of looked and double looked and, errm, you know, obviously, there was twenty seconds of, you know, she must be there (laughs). Errm, but there was no doubt in my mind within (laughs) probably thirty seconds, errm, that Madeleine had been taken from that room. I can't go into the reasons why I thought that but it was... no doubt whatsoever. And Madeleine wouldn't have walked out herself. I know that.

So she had said the patio door was left unlocked so Madeleine could get out ,  then here contradicts it by saying she wouldn’t have walked out by herself . I remember too a heavy curtain being mentioned .

you claimed kate said the door was too heavy...wheres your cite....you havent given one

Offline Snowgirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2857 on: November 10, 2020, 07:37:33 PM »
you claimed kate said the door was too heavy...wheres your cite....you havent given one
i haven’t . Do you know why ? Because I have a life outside of this forum so I don’t keep everything I read to refer to as you do . It might take a while before I can provide a cite and this isn’t a court of law where I’m on trial btw.

If you’ve ever stayed in a hotel or apartment where those kind of doors are in place you should know how heavy they are anyway . .Maybe not for a man but I find them so .

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2858 on: November 10, 2020, 07:42:27 PM »
i haven’t . Do you know why ? Because I have a life outside of this forum so I don’t keep everything I read to refer to as you do . It might take a while before I can provide a cite and this isn’t a court of law where I’m on trial btw.

If you’ve ever stayed in a hotel or apartment where those kind of doors are in place you should know how heavy they are anyway . .Maybe not for a man but I find them so .

You think I dont have a life outside this forum....how little you know. You dont have a cite ...fine. you are obvioulsly getting angry and abusive

it would be important if kate had said the patio door was too heavy for Maddie to open...that would be highly significant...but it seems she didnt



Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2859 on: November 10, 2020, 07:52:00 PM »
That is Snowgirl's opinion in this case.

Shes stating a fact...


Quote from: Snowgirl on Today at 06:31:31 PM
Do you really believe the story that the door was left unlocked so Madeleiine could come to find them? Her mother later denied she would leave and anyway said the door would be  too heavy for her!


Offline Snowgirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2860 on: November 10, 2020, 07:55:14 PM »
You think I dont have a life outside this forum....how little you know. You dont have a cite ...fine. you are obvioulsly getting angry and abusive

it would be important if kate had said the patio door was too heavy for Maddie to open...that would be highly significant...but it seems she didnt
davel I don’t do anger you say is obvious  nor do I think I’ve been abusive .I’ve told you why I cannot provide a cite at this moment ? You can’t wait ? Fine . I really don’t care . Kate said  on Woman’s Hour  she knew Madeleine wouldn’t go out . Ask yourself how she knew that .
Here’s a link to where Kate said Madeleine would have had to open the door https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/missing-madeleine-mccann-was-snatched-10278077
I quote also a post below of Sadies in another thread on the same topic ...door .

. But we dont know if it was double locked, do we?

Also Madeleine would NOT have walked out of that pitch black porch, closing the door behind her, to then walk along a very dark walled passageway.  A place that had walls too high for her to see over and was curved so that she could not see the end .... and was some 20 metres [66ft] long.   All in darkness.
« Last Edit: November 10, 2020, 08:08:58 PM by Snowgirl »

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2861 on: November 10, 2020, 07:58:27 PM »
davel I don’t do anger you say is obvious  nor do I think I’ve been abusive .I’ve told you why I cannot provide a cite at this moment ? You can’t wait ? Fine . I really don’t care . Kate said  on Woman’s Hour  she knew Madeleine wouldn’t go out . Ask yourself how she knew that .

and then add that to the fact she left the door unlocked because... someone could come in? OR MBM could get out?

tricky one to get out of eh?
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2862 on: November 10, 2020, 08:07:44 PM »
davel I don’t do anger you say is obvious  nor do I think I’ve been abusive .I’ve told you why I cannot provide a cite at this moment ? You can’t wait ? Fine . I really don’t care . Kate said  on Woman’s Hour  she knew Madeleine wouldn’t go out . Ask yourself how she knew that .
Here’s a link to where Kate said Madeleine would have had to open the door https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/missing-madeleine-mccann-was-snatched-10278077

Well it wasnt because the door was too heavy...which would be significant

Offline Snowgirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2863 on: November 10, 2020, 08:17:07 PM »
Well it wasnt because the door was too heavy...which would be significant
Maybe that’s why Kate knew Madeleine  wouldn’t go out ?
She was only slight for her age? I will take Kate’s word for it on this occasion that  Madeleine wouldn’t have left .
That just leaves why the  door was left as it was . Maybe so   “ they”  could come to take her? ( “ they’ve taken her” )
Maybe a prearranged appointment ?
Maybe Madeleine wasn’t well maybe was injured ,had to be taken somewhere?
It’s all supposition .

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #2864 on: November 10, 2020, 08:31:56 PM »
How do you think "Looks like she was abducted and murdered by CB.." is acceptable?

You can't prove it is true.
« Last Edit: November 10, 2020, 08:37:48 PM by Robittybob1 »
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.