« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Down

Author Topic: Brueckner V McCann's  (Read 10758 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline barrier

Re: Brueckner V McCann's
« Reply #30 on: September 13, 2020, 01:49:39 PM »
Quote from: Vertigo Swirl on September 13, 2020, 01:48:29 PM
13 years of waiting for someone, anyone to describe a plausible, logical theory of parental involvement.  Can you do it?  If so PM me, I'd love to hear it!

No thanks.
Logged
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Brueckner V McCann's
« Reply #31 on: September 13, 2020, 01:49:45 PM »
Quote from: barrier on September 13, 2020, 01:45:22 PM
Kizzy is asking for circumstantial I'm asking what definitive evidence in the public domain makes the new suspect anymore culpable than the Mccanns?  what definitive piece of evidence makes a supporter know the McCanns didn't do it?
You know full well there is nothing in the public domain so why ask? 
Logged
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Brueckner V McCann's
« Reply #32 on: September 13, 2020, 01:50:37 PM »
Quote from: barrier on September 13, 2020, 01:45:22 PM
Kizzy is asking for circumstantial I'm asking what definitive evidence in the public domain makes the new suspect anymore culpable than the Mccanns?  what definitive piece of evidence makes a supporter know the McCanns didn't do it?

gilroy was found guilty of murder based on circumstantial evidence...
Logged

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Brueckner V McCann's
« Reply #33 on: September 13, 2020, 01:50:55 PM »
Quote from: barrier on September 13, 2020, 01:49:39 PM
No thanks.
I didn't expect you would for a moment, for the simple reason - you don't have one.
Logged
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline kizzy

Re: Brueckner V McCann's
« Reply #34 on: September 13, 2020, 02:38:37 PM »
Quote from: Vertigo Swirl on September 13, 2020, 01:14:35 PM
Question: what is the main difference between this thread and the one Kizzy started asking "Is there more circumstantial evidence against the McCanns than against CB?"

Yes there is imo
Logged

Offline sadie

Re: Brueckner V McCann's
« Reply #35 on: September 13, 2020, 03:02:30 PM »
Quote from: kizzy on September 13, 2020, 02:38:37 PM
Yes there is imo

Can you explain the differences please, cos they seem to serve the same purposes to me.
Logged

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Brueckner V McCann's
« Reply #36 on: September 13, 2020, 03:02:41 PM »
Logged
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline kizzy

Re: Brueckner V McCann's
« Reply #37 on: September 13, 2020, 03:10:39 PM »
Quote from: sadie on September 13, 2020, 03:02:30 PM
Can you explain the differences please, cos they seem to serve the same purposes to me.

IMO there is more on the mccs ....CB I believe doesnt even come close.
Logged

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Brueckner V McCann's
« Reply #38 on: September 13, 2020, 03:36:14 PM »
Quote from: kizzy on September 13, 2020, 03:10:39 PM
IMO there is more on the mccs ....CB I believe doesnt even come close.

Yes you have loads... But it's all tripe imo..
If a tenth of it was true the McCanns would be arrested... So sceptics have to make up a conspiracy  that the McCanns are being protected by the Illuminati
Logged

Offline kizzy

Re: Brueckner V McCann's
« Reply #39 on: September 13, 2020, 03:53:37 PM »
Quote from: Davel on September 13, 2020, 03:36:14 PM
Yes you have loads... But it's all tripe imo..
If a tenth of it was true the McCanns would be arrested... So sceptics have to make up a conspiracy  that the McCanns are being protected by the Illuminati

You think they have been proved innocent .....so what are you so worried about.

Why is it your mission in life to try and discredit everything and the poster who thinks they are involved in Maddie's disappearance.?
Logged

Offline Brietta

Re: Brueckner V McCann's
« Reply #40 on: September 13, 2020, 03:54:15 PM »

Intriguing ... but what on earth does it mean?

Exactly what does the 'V' in the title signify one puzzles apart from preposterous misuse of an apostrophe.
Logged
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Brietta

Re: Brueckner V McCann's
« Reply #41 on: September 13, 2020, 04:32:41 PM »
Quote from: Davel on September 13, 2020, 04:07:46 PM
Could you try and stick t o facts not tripe.. I've. never claimed they've been proven innocent..
What do you know about my mission in life.. More tripe

I have to agree with that comment.
It would be good practice for members to desist from posting opinionated, personal comments aimed at other members they really know nothing about.  I'm sure that somewhere it must be against forum rules.  Short of the institution of draconian moderation and modification which I am sure no-one really wants, I am afraid we will just have to hope for a modicum of self regulation and good manners to be adopted :)
Logged
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline The General

Re: Brueckner V McCann's
« Reply #42 on: September 13, 2020, 05:19:12 PM »
Quote from: Brietta on September 13, 2020, 04:32:41 PM
I have to agree with that comment.
It would be good practice for members to desist from posting opinionated, personal comments aimed at other members they really know nothing about.  I'm sure that somewhere it must be against forum rules.  Short of the institution of draconian moderation and modification which I am sure no-one really wants, I am afraid we will just have to hope for a modicum of self regulation and good manners to be adopted :)

Quote from: Brietta on September 13, 2020, 03:54:15 PM
Intriguing ... but what on earth does it mean?

Exactly what does the 'V' in the title signify one puzzles apart from preposterous misuse of an apostrophe.
Logged
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Brueckner V McCann's
« Reply #43 on: September 13, 2020, 05:52:09 PM »
Quote from: The General on September 13, 2020, 05:19:12 PM


My comments are not direscted at kizzy personally..they are directed at what she posts. kizzy's commnets are directed at me personally..I dont really mind because its mostly tripe...but it is best if we try and avoid personal commnents and stick to criticising whats posted.
Logged

Offline Brietta

Re: Brueckner V McCann's
« Reply #44 on: September 13, 2020, 05:59:30 PM »
Quote from: The General on September 13, 2020, 05:19:12 PM
Quote from: Brietta on Today at 04:32:41 PM
I have to agree with that comment.
It would be good practice for members to desist from posting opinionated, personal comments aimed at other members they really know nothing about.  I'm sure that somewhere it must be against forum rules.  Short of the institution of draconian moderation and modification which I am sure no-one really wants, I am afraid we will just have to hope for a modicum of self regulation and good manners to be adopted :)

Quote from: Brietta on Today at 03:54:15 PM
Intriguing ... but what on earth does it mean?

Exactly what does the 'V' in the title signify one puzzles apart from preposterous misuse of an apostrophe.

Yes I know what I posted.

Are you trying to say something.  In the interest of freedom of speech might I encourage you by saying "Please do."
Logged
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Up
« previous next »